Second Coming Ignorance

Second Coming Ignorance


Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and thereby the Father who sent Jesus, Allah who sent Muhammad and the Creator of the Universe) wrote an amusing response to Moreno’s article about him entitled Is Robert Priddy A Fundamentalist Christian?

Robert Priddy responded (in part):

Robert Priddy: Firstly, Joe Moreno (as vishvarupa108) made wide accusations of clinging to a Christian fundamentalist belief against the group he calls “anti-Sais” which is shown in the following posting which turned up in an archived e-mail attachment I received. There he claimed we all cling to a “second coming” mentality because we have nothing else to cling to. Wholly preposterous, of course, and indicative of Christian fundamentalism - for belief in the Second Coming is hardly no longer a belief promoted by mainstream Christianity (as opposed to fundamentalists). Moreno’s co-worker Lisa de Witt (who he never criticises or corrects despite her outrageous statements) has definitively included and named me as Christian and fundamentalist (which she may try to deny). Therefore Moreno is obviously aligned with her by his recent stated support for her claims.

First and foremost, Moreno has never supported the alleged claim that Lisa De Witt said that Robert Priddy is a Christian. Lisa de Witt denies making such a claim and although Robert Priddy expected Lisa de Witt to deny the claim, he provided no references to support his comments about her. Therefore, this particular argument by Robert Priddy is totally deflated. Secondly, let us look at Moreno’s actual comments (with references) in proper context regarding his usage of the term “second coming”:

Joe Moreno: Yes, Dave, you can still cling to your “second coming” mentality regarding the “truth” that will come out regarding the murders. (Reference)

Joe Moreno: Anti-SSB Activists are clinging to their “second coming” mentality and are relying on unsubstantiated propaganda until the evidence they hope exists, surfaces. (Reference)

Joe Moreno: Robert Priddy clings to his second coming mentality, hoping that his conspiracy theory will one day be vindicated. Eleven years and counting and Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba has never been implicated (in any way, shape or form) with the police shootings that occurred on June 6th 1993. (Reference)

As one can clearly see, the context Moreno used for the term “second coming mentality” was non-religious in nature and was not indicative (directly, indirectly or otherwise) that Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees were Christians awaiting the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

As rational and intelligent readers are aware, the term “Second Coming” (besides referring to Christ’s return) is also a semantical term commonly used by prestigious media (including Forbes, Discover magazine, international newspapers, books, movies, TV stations, etc.) that does not refer to the Christian concept of parousia (also known as the “Second Advent”). Rather, the term “second coming” can be used to denote the occurrence, hope or expectation of an actualization, reappearance or re-invention of a person, thing or event.


Common Non-Christian Usage For The Term “Second Coming” In International Media (A Small Selection):

1. The Second Coming of Biofuels


2. Brian O’Leary The Second Coming Of Science


3. The iPhone’s Second Coming


4. Tim Geithner, CNBC, and the Second Coming of Known Unknowns


5. Clough’s Second Coming


6. Why Keegan’s Second Coming at Newcastle may be doomed to failure


7. Al-Qaeda: The Second Coming


8. Second Empire to expand in ‘second coming’


9. The Second Coming Of Richard Li


10. The Second Coming Of Christos Cotsakos


11. No Quick Second Coming for Dead Zimdollar


12. The Second Coming of Newt Gingrich


13. Tony Blair’s second coming


14. HOMEOPATHY: THE SECOND COMING


15. Medvedev as the Second Coming of Gorbachev


16. The Second Coming Of Identity Politics


17. Imperfect Charisma: The Second Coming of Benazir Bhutto

Therefore, Moreno’s usage of the term “second coming mentality” proves he did not imply or insinuate (in the least) that Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees were Christians awaiting the Second Advent of Jesus Christ.


Robert Priddy Denies Christian Anti-Baba Movements:
Robert Priddy (under the pseudonym “Participant Observer”) said:

Robert Priddy (Pseudonym “Participant Observer”): No, bazza1, I am not a Christian or a follower of any other organised religion. This is typical of Sai people... to think that vested church interests are behind the allegations etc. because Sai Org. chief Indulal Shah made this specious claim in directives against his better knowledge. I know of no Church involvments, and I know the exposé scene better than most. (Reference)

That’s right, Robert Priddy claimed that he knew of no Church involvements against Sathya Sai Baba despite the fact that his co-conspirator and co-writer Barry Pittard openly boasted about polarizing Christians against Sathya Sai Baba. Reinier van der Sandt (the webmaster to the largest Anti-Baba websites on the internet and a known associate of Robert Priddy) posted Christian banners on his Ex-Baba domain (Ref) and wrote a couple of letters to Cardinal Simonis attempting to polarize Christians against Sathya Sai Baba. Read The Full Article About Christian Anti-Hindu and Anti-Baba Movements Here.

So when Robert Priddy attempted to argue that Moreno “hypoctitically tries through vehement denial to appear to distance himself from the business of smearing ‘Anti-Sais’ as Christians and/or fundamentalists among whom he definitively includes me”, he is out of touch with reality.

The extreme way in which Robert Priddy pigeonholes Moreno’s words gives one the distinct impression that Robert Priddy is unmovable by truth or reason and his moral cowardice is masked in bold rhetoric.

Screencap Fraud Against Gerald Joe Moreno

Screencap Fraud Against Gerald Joe Moreno

Anti-Sai Activists Caught In A Deliberate Act Of Screencap Fraud
Although Moreno has been saying for years that Anti-Sai Activists are frauds, cheats and liars, there is now conclusive proof that Ex-Devotees are openly resorting to fraudulence by publishing faked “screencaps” of webpages they alleged were taken from Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain.

On Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson’s Anti-Sai website, he published an obviously faked ‘screencap’ of Moreno’s About Me webpage (Moreno’s picture has been covered and the thumbnail pic can be enlarged by clicking on it):


Obvious Discrepancies On The Bogus Screencap:

1. Notice the complete difference in width.


2. The picture is offset.


3. The text is offset.


4. The spacing between the text “~About Me~” and the picture is incorrect.


5. The spacing between the picture and the text is incorrect.


6. The bogus screen-cap states “New Mexico ~” when it should read “New Mexico, USA~” (the word “USA” is completely missing).


7. The line that reads “I’m captivated by India” should be on one line. On the bogus screen-cap, it isn’t.


8. The text on the original page is tightly snuggled between two side-bars. Notice the vertical, pink line on the bogus screencap (showing a gap where the other sidebar was obviously added). This vertical line is nowhere to be found on Moreno’s geocities website.


9. Notice that the spacing between the sidebars is significantly wider than it is on Moreno’s geocities website. For instance, the sentence “For the past 14 years I have traveled many times to India” fills the entire space between the sidebars. On the bogus screencap, there is additional spacing on both sides of that sentence although the extra word “I’m” was added (note that the font size has been set in the html).


10. The line that reads “I’m rational, logical and down to earth. Yes, seriously. I’m Caucasian/Italian/Mexican Blend and 34 years young” is the very last and concluding statement on the page. It is not (and never has been) located in the introductory comments, conclusively proving the screencap was faked.

About the bogus screencap, Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson said:

Conny Larsson: (screen captures are from a secondary source on the web which reproduced parts of his vishvarupa.com pages)

Needless to say, Moreno’s geocities webpages were never “reproduced” on his vishvarupa.com domain. Therefore, the claim of a “secondary source” is a bold-faced and gutter lie. Why would critics need to rely on “secondary sources” when Moreno’s geocities webpages are still on the internet? The “secondary sources” admission from critics proves they did not obtain the screencap legitimately or directly from Moreno’s geocities website.

Of course, this is not the first time that Ex-Devotees have published fraudulent information against Moreno. See:

1. QuickTopic Posts And The ‘saibabaexpose’ Lie


2. Cloaked Or Anonymous IP Lies


3. “Fighting The Smears” Articles: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09 - 10

Robert Priddy’s Publication Of A Fraudulent Screencap
Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) published a screencap on his defamatory Anti-Baba blog that he alleged was taken from Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain. In truth, the screencap most certainly did not come from Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain! Even the title on Priddy’s bogus screencap is messed up (whereas the title on Moreno’s webpage has never been messed up).

Moreno still has all his backups from his vishvarupa.com domain going back to 2004 and none of those backups contain the fake URL listed on Priddy’s bogus screencap. As a matter of fact, all of Moreno’s articles (beside pictures) were published under the folder “Fair-Is-Fair” and the links page with relevant redirects can be found here (which has been online since mid-2005 when Moreno moved his Sai Controversy webpages to his newer saisathyasai.com domain).

Robert Priddy’s Bogus Screencap:


The geocities webpages in question were made using geocities webpage-maker. Therefore, all of the pictures and text in Moreno’s articles are set to exact specifications that cannot be easily duplicated on other websites. It certainly appears that someone copied Moreno’s image files and attempted to mess with the html with obvious and messy results!

Important points to ponder:

1. Why would Moreno lie about not duplicating his geocities webpages on his vishvarupa.com domain?


2. What would Moreno have to lose considering that the webpages in question are still available on the internet on geocities?


3. Critics have not (so far) alleged that there are any discrepancies between their copies of Moreno’s webpages and the ones currently online. So what exactly are critics whining about?

How Robert Priddy’s Screencap Was Most Likely Falsified:
A simple way to falsify the screencap is to simply replace the web address with a different one. A simple tactic that anyone can do in a matter of seconds. For example, look at the following screencap. By observing it, one would think that the Albert Einstein template was published on Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain. It wasn’t. The web address was simply changed and the screencap taken.


These are the types of shameless liars, deceivers and counterfeiters who are attempting to portray themselves as credible and moral voices against Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba!

Critics should come forward with full screencaps to all of Moreno’s alleged webpages and make them publicly available for public scrutiny. After all, what do they have to fear? One is left to wonder why critics are publishing bits and pieces of Moreno’s webpages (many years after the fact) that reveal altered and manipulated text, font and urls.

Even though Moreno’s vishvarupa.com and geocities websites are archived on archive.org, Robert Priddy (being the conspiracist that he is) attempted to argue that Moreno was somehow able to manipulate and deceive archive.org about which content they archived!

Of course, Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate (who publicly solicited a Pro-Drug Forum intended for drug users). Robert Priddy is also a fierce defender, promoter and associate of Conny Larsson, an ex-devotee turned self-professed Prophet and Psychic Trance Medium! And to top it all off, Robert Priddy fabricated sexual molestation claims against Moreno.

1. If Robert Priddy has the temerity to falsify sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other stories of sexual molestation is he falsifying as well?


2. If Robert Priddy shamelessly falsified sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what is to stop him from falsifying other information against Moreno as well?

Sai Devotee Anywhere Between 17-26 Years

Sai Devotee Anywhere Between 17-26 Years

Robert Priddy ceaselessly contradicts himself about how long he was a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba and when he defected from the Sai Movement. One thing is certain: Robert Priddy and Reidun Priddy became Sai Devotees in 1983. Robert & Reidun claimed they left Sathya Sai Baba in April of 2000. Therefore, Robert Priddy was a Sai Devotee for 17 years. Needless to say, Robert Priddy has blatantly exaggerated (i.e., “lied”) and purposely embellished the number of years he was an alleged Sai Devotee. Look at the following screencap that proves this point (click on picture to enlarge):


Although both Robert and Reidun Priddy were devotees of Sathya Sai Baba for 17 years, Robert Priddy progressively changed the number of years from “about 18 years” to “18 years” to “20 years” to “26 years”! Robert Priddy was also writing Anti-Sai Articles as early as March 2001.

As Moreno has said many times before, Robert Priddy is a known exaggerator, liar and deceiver with proof. All of the screencaps above were obtained solely through Anti-Sai Websites. But most of them came directly from Robert Priddy’s Anti-Sai Websites. Needless to say, Robert Priddy will continue to whine, snivel and lie that all the claims Moreno makes against him are not supported with facts, etc. (as he has spammed on his Anti-Baba blog and elsewhere on the internet).

Legal Threat Sent Robert Priddy Packing

Legal Threat Sent Robert Priddy Packing

Dr. Leo Rebello, N.D., Ph.D., D.Sc., F.F.Hom, MBA, is the Director of Natural Health Centre, Bombay. He has delivered over 10,000 lectures in 63 countries (including WHO, UNAIDS, UNESCO, UNDP, UNEP, UN-HABITAT conferences), has written 30 books and has been interviewed by the world media.

Due to Leo Rebello’s critical (albeit private) emails about Mary Garden’s book “The Serpent Rising”, Ex-Devotees herded together (as they typically do) and spammed Leo Rebello with numerous hate emails.

Leo Rebello responded likewise and wrote what definitely appeared to be highly confrontive and defamatory responses. However, Leo Rebello wrote his replies privately, without attempting to give them publicity on the internet. Needless to say, Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) decided to publicly smear Leo Rebello and published selective and private emails allegedly sent to him by Leo Rebello. Robert Priddy purposely misspelled various email addresses (so they could not be identified) and purposely misspelled his own name as “Rob*rt Pr*ddy” so as to “avoid undue web publicity from search engines for myself”. Noticeably absent were many of the emails that prompted Leo Rebello’s responses in the first place.

Going for the jugular, Robert Priddy publicly published Leo Rebello’s alleged emails with Mary Garden and others on the following three websites:

• home.chello.no/~reirob/Rebello.htm


• angeltowns.com/members/tanik/


• metasci.tripod.com/hom.htm

Leo Rebello responded by threatening Robert Priddy with a million dollar legal suit for defamation and:

1. Publicly accused Robert Priddy of being a homosexual.


2. Publicly accused Robert Priddy of being sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba.


3. Publicly accused Robert Priddy of having a gay lover named “Ronald Pallas”.


4. Publicly alleged that Robert Priddy was suffering from AIDS.


5. Publicly alleged that Robert Priddy used bogus email IDs.


6. Publicly alleged that he filed a legal suit against AngelTowns and sent copies to the Mumbai Police, Interpol, Euro police and Swedish police.

In emails no longer online, Rebello alleged:

1. Robert Priddy was suffering from “schizophrenia”.


2. Robert Priddy was a “nitwit”.


3. Everyone at ExBaba.com were “homosexuals”, “drug addicts“ or “vagabonds“.


4. Robert Priddy wrote a lot of “shit”.


5. Robert Priddy wrote a lot of “spam”.


6. Robert Priddy was a “buffoon” and compared the ExBaba admin to “deranged gang members”.


7. Robert Priddy was a “nut case”, “sick man” and a “mentally deranged person”.

By reading Rebello’s opinions about Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees, one could definitely say that Rebello’s opinions were defamatory and libelous. HOWEVER, what was Robert Priddy’s response to Leo Rebello’s million dollar legal threat?

First, Robert Priddy egotistically challenged Leo Rebello and said:

Robert Priddy: So it is with confidence that I would face Rebello in the Norwegian courts, where whatever reputation he may have will really be destroyed in a sound public fashion (note: I am not under any Indian jurisdiction, of course). In any case, my counter-damages would be considerable, of course, and he will have to face all the costs too. The only problem is, in the most unlikely even of him appearing in this country which I know so well, it would be utterly boring and distasteful to have to do with such an unbalanced person as one can see he is from his ravings and (judging by his fixation on gutter sex language) such an apparently sexually-disturbed individual.

Then what did Robert Priddy do? Robert Priddy immediately and promptly deleted all of his public webpages against Leo Rebello although it appeared that Leo Rebello was the one guilty of defamation. WHY did Robert Priddy (who often makes legal threats against others) cave in so quickly to Leo Rebello’s legal threat? Could it be there was some truth to Leo Rebello’s claims about Robert Priddy?

I suspect there was.

I also suspect that Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees sent Leo Rebello highly defamatory emails as well (which would explain their absence on Robert Priddy’s former Anti-Rebello websites).

As a matter of fact, the following email (sent at 2:42 A.M.) from Robert Priddy (which he publicly released and self-disclosed on AngelTowns for years as public domain) provides revealing insights as to what provoked Leo Rebello to write what he did:

Robert Priddy: Dr. Leo Rebello, Having found out some of what you wrote to Mary Garden as according to the new posting on the web (www.exbaba.com), I recognise that you are clearly a King among that broad class of people who are “ignorant and arrogant”. Probably you have imbibed too much of your own urine and other products. I know the whole story of the contorted ayurveda which is now largely ancient superstition from a time when people died not even knowing the actual causes... and you have the temerity to proffer yourself as a candidate for the Swedish Nobel Prize in medicine! Some hopes you do have! One has to chuckle at your supreme witlessness.

You are just a self-promoting parasite on well-known people (Weve seen the promo photos and your sheepish pride such as with the famous like Deepak Chopra, another expensive cheapjack). Who do you think you are to talk about abortion as murder, when you have murdered your own intelligence with your overweening ego and grasping nature... and indirectly share the heavy responsiblity with your absurd brain-washed AIDS propaganda for the awful sufferings and unnecessary deaths of countless AIDS victims. You in your ridiculous rainbow-coloured coat... not a Jacob but a patronising skunk whose words show your lack of normal human decency, absence of compassion and moral stupidity. Besides, the Brahma principle, as you would probably call it, does not enter the human foetus until around 14 weeks, and you don't even know that!

Never fear, the advance of medicine will sweep away all the detritus of your perverted kind of ‘spirituality’ in the course of time as the race evolves. You most probably believe in hell... so may you be happy in it! With righteous scorn for an all-round indecent priggish and wholly unconvincing ‘man’. And you are being monitored carefully by people you are not aware of. Take good care, instead of mouthing off...

Robert Priddy also published the following disgusting picture of Rebello on his angeltowns account:


This is the way pseudo-moralist Robert Priddy typically attacks his detractors.

According to Leo Rebello, he was sent harassing emails from:

1. korola@start.no (Ronald Pallas, who happened to have the exact same IP as Robert Priddy, raising the suspicion that the name “Ronald Pallas” may be a pseudonym.)


2. r.v.d.sandt@hetnet.nl (Rienier Van Der Sandt)


3. ex-baba@hetnet.nl (Reinier Van Der Sandt)


4. dark_knight_9@yahoo.com (Sanjay Dadlani)


5. ompukalani@hotmail.com (Brian Steel)


6. RaviChandra@everyday.com (Ravi Chandra - Unknown and raising the suspicion that the name “Ravi Chandra” may be a pseudonym.)


7. marygarden@bigpond.com (Mary Garden)


8. glenmeloy@earthlink.net (Glen Meloy)


9. yesontruth@earthlink.net (Glen Meloy)


10. conny@email.com (Conny Larsson)
    
11. norbert@chello.no (Norbert K Hinna - Unknown)
    
12. bpittard@beachaccess.com.au (Barry Pittard)
    
13. rover@jcputty.com (Unknown and a suspected pseudonymous account)


14. allenbro@chello.no (Unknown and a suspected pseudonymous account)


15. robrei@start.no (Robert & Reidun Priddy)


16. rpriddy@online.no (Robert Priddy)


17. rero@chello.no (Robert Priddy)


18. satyavijaya@myrealbox.com (Robert Priddy)


19. anir@start.no (Robert Priddy and/or Randi Godager - “anir” was the name of the root folder to one of Robert Priddy’s Anti-Baba websites and it is unknown why “Randi Godager” would use an email address that resolved specifically to Robert Priddy’s Anti-Baba domain, raising the suspicion that the name “Randi Godager” may be a pseudonym.)

One can’t help to wonder why Ex-Devotees spammed Leo Rebello numerous times under various email addresses. It certainly appears that Ex-Devotees attempted to portray themselves as different people (under various email accounts) and were caught in the act by Rebello.

Leo Rebello’s Original Comments About His Legal Threat Against Robert Priddy On Indymedia (Since Deleted By Indymedia Because Of Priddy’s Defamatory Comments And Due To A Legal Threat Against Them As Well):

india.indymedia.org/en/2004/01/208787.shtml
REJOINDER TO ROBERT PRIDDY's MALICIOUS COMMENTS
Dr. Leo Rebello 29/10/2004 08:39
leorebello@vsnl.com
http://www.aidsalternativa.org

ROBERT PRIDDY (rpriddy@online.no; robrei@start.no)
AND ANGEL TOWN (http://www.angeltowns.com)
SUED FOR MISCHIEF ON THE NET
For more details contact Dr. Leo Rebello
Email : leorebello@vsnl.com
Website : www.aidsalternativa.org

The topic above is World Parliament and look at what this moron called Robert Priddy is writing. The so-called defamatory emails that he is referring to were all in response to his spamming and mudslinging. I do NOT know this bum personally. Robert Priddy claims that he is a British scholar, who earlier retired from Swedish university and now residing in Oslo, Norway. This 70+ nitwit sometimes writes that he retired as Lecturer and sometimes as Professor of Sociology and Philosophy. Earlier he taught Botany!!! He also worked for Satya Sai Baba and was obviously used by Baba. Hence, he and his insane colleagues have started a website called www.exbaba.com in which they say that Baba screwed many of them at Putthaparthy. If their charge that Baba is a Homosexual is true, then Baba obviously knows who are Homosexuals!!! Robert Priddy is one of them.

This Robert Priddy and his other colleagues on www.exbaba.com all of a sudden started spamming me in mid-December 2003 and continued till January 2004, till I served a legal notice on them and complained to various authorities.

Briefly the case is: One Mary Garden, the writer of The Serpent Rising, resident of Australia sent me her said book duly autographed, for REVIEW in Indian media. I do not know her personally. Infact, it is her publisher who first got in touch with me by scanning Indian authors and publishers directory.

On reading the said book I found it very disgusting and I wrote to her and the publisher that I would not be reviewing it. Thereafter, the whore unleashed madmen like Robert Priddy on me and they would spam me daily hitting below the belt and I too in turn give them good. During one month, I carpet bombed them with about 40 replies, including a notice to Mary Garden. She kept quiet, but this crook called Robert Priddy continued because no one had challenged him before about his dirty habits.

Homosexuals, as you would know always attack from behind. Since they could not fight with me, this Robert Priddy and "her" husband Ronald Pallas put some webpages on http://www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/ since it offers free hosting. Robert Priddy is suffering from AIDS, "because AIDS is predominantly a disease limited to Homosexuals" Dr. Gordon Stewart, Emeritus Professor of Public Health, Universityof Glasgow, UK (for more details read my book AIDS and Alternative Medicine soon going into 4th edition due to popular demand).

I came to know of this piddling Priddy's mischief about three days ago and served a legal notice on AngelTowns.com, with copies to Mumbai Police, Interpol, Euro police, Swedish police, etc. Immediately the said defamatory matter was removed and the AngelTowns.com confirmed that offending ininformation was listed for the user called Ronald Pallas IP: 80.111.17.23 email: korola@start.no

I did further search to find out whether the mischief of these Homosexual idiots had spread and found that even on responsible Indymedia this man had planted the above libelous comment. This therefore is my candid reply.

Now let us come to Mary Garden's book The Serpent Rising, with which this nuisance started. Mary Garden of Australia has documented some of her forays into sex, drugs, and vagrancy in that book. Here are some nuggets: Sai Baba, she says, is a hermaphrodite & homosexual - page 44 and talks of surrendering to him - page 16. Then she runs away from him because he played footsie with her but did not call her to his bedroom. She is therefore disappointed and runs away to Rishikesh in the Himalayas. There she gets pregnant from Balyogi - page 203. She then aborts a 4-month fetus (a boy according to the nurse who puts the fetus in the dustbin) in a Delhi Nursing Home and feels it was a murder - page 211. Next she has encounters with Rajneesh in his dark chambers in Pune, etc. etc. The cover page shows Rajneesh working on her. Prior to meeting all these "unholy men" like Satya Sai Baba, Balyogi Premvarni and Rajneesh (her words), Mary enjoyed drugs & sex with older men in Auckland, by the time she was 16 - page 5. Infact her sexual experiments started at a very young age when the neighbour took her and her sister in a hen house and made them do felatio. And such a pornographic book she has dedicated to her two children. The details about her husband are missing.

I received the said book on 2nd December, 2003. After reading it I wrote to her that I was disappointed with her book and I will NOT be reviewing the same since it was semi-pornographic. So, she got wild and pressed into service Robert Priddy ( rpriddy@online.no; robrei@start.no;); Ravi Chandra ( RaviChandra@everyday.com); and these other persons with emails like satyavijaya@myrealbox.com; r.v.d.sandt@hetnet.nl; dark_knight_9@yahoo.com; anir@start.no; ompukalani@hotmail.com; rover@jcputty.com; ex_baba@hetnet.nl; rero@chello.no (I do NOT know any one of them), and they started spamming me till I sent them the following warning :-

----- Original Message ----- From: DR. LEO REBELLO To: rpriddy@online.no ; robrei@start.no
Cc: abuse@vsnl.com ; customerservice@vsnl.co.in
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:09 PM
Subject: Robert Priddy -- your spam returned

ROBERT PRIDDY Thrice you have said that you have my telephone number. So, what can you do? You also have my complete postal address. So, what can you do? I do not operate from behind post box addresses or bogus email IDs like you. You have also seen my photographs with the Prime Ministers, Presidents and other dignitaries on my website: www.aidsalternativa.org So, what can you do? This is your final warning, Robert Priddy. Piss off. Or you will spend the rest of your life in the Indian jails.
Best wishes for your sanity
Dr. Leo Rebello

So, this explains the full story.

Now, what I wish to know from Indymedia is whether they periodically check the violations on the Net or not. This Robert Priddy's libelous comment on me has been displayed on Indymedia since February 2004. In these months, it must have done immense harm to my reputation. Now, I want it to continue along with this my candid reply till the matter is solved.

Eventhough Angel Town has immediately removed the offending page http://www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/ that Priddy refers to; I have served a one million-dollar damages claim on them. If Indymedia were to remove this comment and not apologise to me, and/or post other such mischievous comments from some bogus, I will make Indymedia also a party in the defamation case. Other mischief-makers should also take note.

MISCHIEF ON THE NET

Mischief on and by Indymedia
Dr. Leo Rebello 15/11/2004 06:23
leorebello@hotmail.com

One Robert Priddy has put a mischievous comment as under:

Dr. Leo Rebello
Not applicable 15/02/2004 12:36
rpriddy@online.no

http://www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/

Against this, I posted a counter comment on 29th October, 2004, at about 2.00 PM. You were also notified on Saturday, October 30, 2004 1:16 PM vide an email. Till today, my counter has not appeared nor have you replied to this deliberate mischief. So, there seems to be a clear violation of netiquettes and I may be constrained to send you a defamation notice and/or institute criminal proceedings against Indymedia if this mischief continues. So, please post my reply to Robert Priddy, immediately. Thanks.

Robert Priddy loves to reference his libels to other people on the internet. Even referencing his sexual abuse libels against Moreno to Basava Premanand (who libeled Moreno the same way).

Consequently, if one were to use the exact same standards against Robert Priddy (that he used/uses against Moreno), he would be implicated in a rats nest of allegations that include homosexuality (let us not forget his son’s use of dildos and transvestites as theatrics in his music band and Priddy’s homoerotic dreams), AIDS, drugs, fake names, etc., all supported by a legal threat that sent Robert Priddy packing with his tail between his legs!

Tsk.

Robert Priddy - Blogged Articles To Date

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

BLOG INDEX OF ARTICLES ABOUT ROBERT PRIDDY SO FAR:

Robert Priddy's Drug Years:
- Robert Priddy’s “A Vision Of Cosmic Energy” (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy’s “Truth, Being And Bliss” (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy’s “The Psychedelic Experience” (or Archive)

- Robert Priddy Cites Pro-Drug Forum For Drug Users
- Robert Priddy's Drug Years - An Overview (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy Removing Biographical Data
- Robert Priddy's Copyright Blathering

Fighting The Smears
- The Laughable Sheila Waring Lie
- Does Robert Priddy Have AIDS?
- Dirty Old Man Robert Priddy
- Fundamentalist Christian Label
- Robert Priddy's Lies Spiral Out Of Control
- Defense Of The Sai Organization
- Public Pictures And Swami Premananda
- Sai Petition And SaiSathyaSai Server
- Pervert Priddy Fantasizes Molestation

Miscellaneous Articles About Robert C. Priddy
- Robert Priddy - A Time Line
- Priddy's Primary Webpage Indexed On Porn Sites (or Archive)
- Is Robert Priddy Well Funded?
- Robert Priddy's Pro/Anti Sai Baba Books (or Archive)
- Priddy's Disreputable Air-Signaller Training (or Archive)
- Source Of The Homoerotic Dreams?
- Robert Priddy's Moon Madness
- Robert Priddy And The saibaba.org.uk Domain
- Robert Priddy's Man In The Moon
- To Be Or Not To Be Anonymous
- Robert Priddy - The Hinduism Basher
- Robert Priddy's "Transvestite" Guru
- Robert Priddy's Perverted Friends
- NitwitNastik And Robert Priddy
- Robert Priddy - A Supporter Of Idi Amin?
- SathyaSaiBabaNews Wordpress Blog
- Proxy Defender Of Sai Isa And Barry Pittard
- Royal Liberty School Reunion 2003
- Robert Priddy - The Grinch
- Robert Priddy's Guru Foot Fetish

Robert Priddy - The Gullible Pseudo-Skeptic
- The Wax Lingam MIRACLE!
- Robert Priddy - The True Believer
- Robert Priddy's Telepathic Claims
- Priddy's Psychic Friend Conny Larsson
- Robert Priddy's Gullible / Brainwashed Years
- Erik Yaman Konuralp

Examples Of Robert Priddy’s Blatant Lies
- Typical Robert Priddy "Evidence" Trash
- Robert Priddy's Penultimate Lie
- Dr. Erlendur Haraldsson & Robert Priddy
- Pre-Senility Or Just Blatantly Inaccurate
- Robert Priddy's Fraudulent Information (or Archive)
- Materialized Green Diamond Rings? (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy’s Penchant For Prevarication (or Archive)
- Bogus "Photographic Evidence" Claim (or Archive)
- David Bailey? Really? (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy And His "Babafan" Lie (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy's Phony "Phone" Lies (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy Lies Again About Joe Moreno
- Robert Priddy's Personal Invites To Prashanti
- Priddy's Shameless Lie About Joy Thomas (or Archive)

Robert Priddy’s Pseudo-Moralism:
- Robert Priddy - The Pseudo-Moralist
- Pseudo-Moralist Robert Priddy

Robert Priddy & Kai Nicolai Priddy:
- Robert & Kai Nicolai Priddy (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy's Son Was Into Kink

Robert Priddy & VK Narasimhan:
- V.K. Narasimhan And Sathya Sai Baba
- VKN - VK Narasimhan

Robert Priddy’s Wikipedia Blunders:
- Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
- Say What? (or Archive)
- Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed (or Archive)
- Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt (or Archive)
- A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder (or Archive)
- Another Example Of Priddy's Poor Research (or Archive)

Defamatory Attacks Against Moreno Addressed:
- Defamatory Attack One: Response 1 (or Archive)
- Defamatory Attack Two: Response 2 (or Archive)
- Defamatory Attack Three: Response 3 (or Archive)

Disempowerment Articles & Responses:
- Robert Priddy: Response 1 (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy: Response 2 (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy: Response 3 (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy: Response 4 (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy: Response 5 (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy: Response 6 (or Archive

Robert Priddy On QuickTopic:
- QuickTopic Deception By Robert Priddy

The Laughable Sheila Waring Lie

Robert Priddy’s Laughable Sheila Waring Lie

About the pseudonym “sheila waring”, Kevin Shepherd said of Moreno:

kevinrdshepherd.net/html/23___sathya_sai_baba__problems.html
“His many blogs are often registered anonymously. He has resorted to many web pseudonyms such as Equalizer, vishvarupa108, and sheilawaring.”

About the pseudonym “sheilawaring”, Psychic Medium Conny Larsson said of Moreno:

saibabaexpose.com/sheilawaring.html
“Someone using the name ‘sheila waring’ reposted Moreno’s deleted postings on Netscape on July 9 2007- very soon after they had been banned and removed by Netscape. The identity of sheilawaring was concealed, but it is not hard to understad that this was either Moreno himself, or one of his proxies - it makes no real difference. That he must have had a hand in it is beyond doubt. The links are all to his defamatory website at saisathyasai.com Here are screenshots of the pages posted by sheilawaring on Netscape, also subsequently deleted by the netscape administration.”

About the pseudonym “sheila waring”, Robert Priddy said of Moreno:

robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/sathyasaibaba-in-the-shadows/
“He has often avoided using his most known username (joe108) in favour of unidentifiable ones like Equalizer, sheilawaring, or - for most people less identifiable ones like visvarupa 108, SSS108 (on Wikipedia) GM, JM, GJM with or without the 108 suffix and so on All were gradually identified as being his. He has also used diverse IPs in his e-mails and comments, as has been documented on various occasions, though he tries to deny it, the proofs are there for any eventual further use. He denied he was equaliser until exposed definitively as such, and he denies that he posted on Netscape under the username sheilawaring - but he is exposed as having done that just after he had been banned under a previous pseudonym like JM108).”

Let it go on record that Moreno has never (ever), at any time, used the name “sheila waring” on digg.com, netscape.com (now propeller.com) or anywhere else for that matter. Contrary to Robert Priddy’s senile claims (which he has been spewing all over his blog in recent weeks), Moreno never “denied” using the name “Equalizer” on his blogs. Once again, Robert Priddy makes unsupported, unsubstantiated and un-referenced claims against Moreno.

In an attempt to bolster their absurd claims that Moreno used the “sheila waring” pseudonym, several screencaps were published on Conny Larsson’s website. And thank goodness they did! After seeing the screencaps, Moreno nearly fell out of his chair laughing because Ex-Devotee’s apparently confused “sheila waring” as a Pro-Moreno Activist when in fact “sheila waring” was an Anti-Sai Activist hiding under a fake name! “Sheila Waring” went through all of Moreno’s posts on Netscape and “sunk” all of them (meaning that “sheilawaring” casted votes against all of Moreno’s articles). This is why Moreno’s articles showed up under “sheilawaring’s” Netscape history. One can clearly see the text saying “Sunk On July 09, 2007 07:49pm” below Moreno’s posts. One can also see the text that says “This story has mostly negative ratings” on top of Moreno’s posts with the number of “sinks” made against his articles. Critics used numerous fake names on Netscape to “sink” Moreno’s articles and all of their fake names were banned, including Robert Priddy, Barry Pittard and Brian Steel’s accounts.


The screencaps provided on Psychic Medium Conny Larsson’s website (which was referenced by True Believer Robert Priddy and others) are provided below:



That’s right, Kevin Shepherd, Conny Larsson and Robert Priddy (all claiming a “scholar” or “professional” status) are too idiotic to read posts correctly (akin to their idiotic inability to read IP headers correctly, even attributing IPs generated by their own computers to Moreno).

What a bunch of pathetic and laughable stooges and loons!

Although Ex-Devotees whine and snivel about Moreno's alleged “pseudonyms”, one will not find a single complaint from any of them about the numerous incognito web identities used by Robert Priddy, Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, UsedByBaba, Barbara Dent and R.F.J. Sandt. Ex-Devotees even attempted to pass themselves off as various individuals (including Pro-Sai Activists and Moreno himself). This type of very disturbing online behavior has been fully documented by Moreno (Refs: 01 - 02).

Expect more spin, deflection and cover-ups from Ex-Devotees, who can’t even identify their own acts of subterfuge in action. Yes, this is exactly the type of shabby “research” and laughable “exposés” that Ex-Devotees typically peddle as the “irrefutable truth” to unsuspecting readers. They do the exact same thing in relation to Sathya Sai Baba as well.

Does Robert Priddy Have AIDS?

Does Robert Priddy Have AIDS?

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) made the following comments on his Anti-Sai conspiracy blog about Lisa de Witt (a Pro-Sai Activist):

Robert Priddy: “However, Moreno (joe108) has widely supported his co-worker - the insufferable Lisa de Witt, who wrote that I am a fascist, a pervert, an alcoholic, a liar and a ‘bozo’ etc., and who also promoted the idea already years ago that I was dying of AIDS.”

Although it is true that Lisa de Witt is a Pro-Sai Activist, she rarely contributes to Moreno’s articles and emails him (on average) perhaps once a week.

Lisa de Witt immediately contacted Joe Moreno about Robert Priddy’s claim that she said “years ago” he was “dying of AIDS”. Lisa de Witt adamantly denied ever making such a comment. Since Robert Priddy never sources his claims against others and repeatedly attributes comments to people who never made them, Moreno believes Lisa de Witt.

Of course, this is not the first time that Robert Priddy falsely attributed comments to others. Joe Moreno has had to write several “Fighting The Smears” Articles (01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09) defending himself from Robert Priddy’s falsely attributed claims and bold-faced libels.

In actuality, Leo Rebello was the person who said “years ago” that Robert Priddy was dying of AIDS. Robert Priddy (whose failing memory appears to be the onslaught of senile dementia) cannot even remember who said what about him and falsely and erroneously attributed Leo Rebello’s comments to Lisa de Witt:

Leo Rebello: “Homosexuals, as you would know always attack from behind. Since they could not fight with me, this Robert Priddy and "her" husband Ronald Pallas put some webpages on http://www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/ since it offers free hosting. Robert Priddy is suffering from AIDS, "because AIDS is predominantly a disease limited to Homosexuals" Dr. Gordon Stewart, Emeritus Professor of Public Health, Universityof Glasgow, UK (for more details read my book AIDS and Alternative Medicine soon going into 4th edition due to popular demand).” (Reference)

Leo Rebello: “Since I am NOT a homosexual, I won't touch a filthy, diseased bastard like you. But if you need my help, I shall certainly help you as a doctor, to treat you of AIDS.” (Reference)

Leo Rebello: “Mike, in all your dealings please always stay on the right track and do not entertain sick men like Robert Priddy. He is dying of AIDS and I forgive his antics. He cannot defame me, because I walk the right path. I do not bend before some senile Guru with my pants down, like him, and then cry hoarse that the Guru did me from behind......” (Reference)

Needless to say, Moreno was fully prepared to dispute and deny the AIDS accusation made against Robert Priddy had Lisa de Witt admitted she made it. In the past, Moreno came forward and defended the Anti-Sai Extremist Basava Premanand from highly questionable claims made against him. An anonymous internet source said Premanand had a concubine, cheated on his wife and that Dr Kovoor died of syphilis. Despite Moreno’s public defense of Basava Premanand from those highly questionable claims, Basava Premanand (several years later) had the audacity to attribute those highly questionable claims to Moreno: See For Yourself.

Robert Priddy was threatened with a million dollar legal suit for defamation by Leo Rebello. What was Robert Priddy’s response to Leo Rebello’s legal threat? Robert Priddy immediately and promptly deleted all of his public webpages against Leo Rebello although it appeared that Leo Rebello was the one guilty of defamation. WHY did Robert Priddy (who often makes legal threats against others) cave in so quickly in face of Leo Rebello’s legal threat? Could it be there was some truth to Leo Rebello’s claims about Robert Priddy?

Robert Priddy is always free to come forward with “documentary evidence” (which he often demands from others) and vindicate himself of the highly questionable AIDS claim made against him.

What say you, Robert Priddy?

Dirty Old Man Robert Priddy

Dirty Old Man Robert Priddy

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) made the following comments on his Anti-Sai conspiracy blog about Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist):

Robert Priddy: Exactly what happened to Moreno in the private interview? The reason for my interest is not prurience but entirely as an investigator and exposer of many described crimes by Sathya Sai Baba. Joe Moreno makes a big deal about not having stated that oil was “massaged” onto his lower stomach (as I claim), saying only that it was “applied”. How then? With a spatula or a sponge? No. It was from Sai Baba’s hand, he has made that clear enough. So was it not rubbed on? (ie. = massaged in?). That way is widely reported by those describing these oil molestations. Joe is VERY cagey indeed about HOW it was applied and exactly how low down, wanting at any cost to escape any idea that he was being ‘groomed’ to see if he would rise to the approach. He says this occurs between the navel and the pubic area… but plenty of others have explained that it includes the genitals. I am not saying that Joe experienced that, but I think Sai baba did take his pants down (he does, according to reports) or told him to do in words or gestures (as other who received his attentions have described). Or did Sai Baba put his hand inside his pants to reach the lower stomach? Or what? Let Moreno explain himself. Too embarrassing to admit, perhaps, what actually was the case?

This article is an addition to two former articles:

1. Robert Priddy’s Sexual Molestation Libels


2. Sai Petition & More Sexual Abuse Libels

Robert Priddy’s fascination with Moreno’s interview experience with Sathya Sai Baba is not only one of “prurience”, it is one of sexual deviancy as well.

No matter how many clarifications, details or explanations Moreno may give, Robert Priddy will never be satisfied, will never let go of his lecherous fantasies and will never let go of his “too embarrassed to talk about it” argument.

Robert Priddy is a dirty old man that can’t stop obsessing, squirming and drooling over the possibility that Sathya Sai Baba did something sexual to Moreno (he didn’t). This type of sexual perversity is best left to psychiatrists, psychosexual therapists and the DSM-IV-TR. It would appear that Robert Priddy is the type of sadist who derives some sort of perverse sexual gratification in humiliating others by projecting his libidinous fantasies onto them.

Despite Moreno’s repeated and tireless clarifications about his interview experiences with Sathya Sai Baba, Robert Priddy continues to deny, distort and falsify Moreno’s account.

Moreno first addressed the sexual abuse libels made against him on July 3rd 2006 and a second time on September 19th 2006. Moreno published a detailed article in August 2007 refuting the sexual abuse libels made against him by Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, Basava Premanand, Conny Larsson, Reineir Van Der Sandt, Barbara Dent, UsedByBaba and Alan Kazlev.

Moreno clearly stated that Sathya Sai Baba applied materialized, fragrant and green oil in one motion of his hand just beneath his belly button (i.e., “lower stomach”, not to be confused with one’s “lower abdomen” or “pubic” region). The oil was such that it promptly disappeared in contact with the skin and left no oily residue. Hence, no “massaging” required. Moreno divulged this information several years back and Robert Priddy continues to deny that Moreno ever made such clarifications!

As a matter of fact, Moreno said:

For those who have the integrity, honesty and decency to research the facts for him/her self, let me be absolutely clear about my oiling experience with Sathya Sai Baba:

I was not sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba.

Sathya Sai Baba did not rub oil on my genitals.

At no time were my pants pulled down or my genitals exposed.

Sathya Sai Baba smeared the oil, in one movement of his hand, just below my belly button. I was not fondled, kissed, massaged or touched in any other way indicative of questionable or inappropriate sexual behavior.

Sathya Sai Baba did not “command” me to observe celibacy. He confirmed I should follow a path I had chosen but had doubts about.

The oil promptly disappeared on contact with my skin. There was no oily residue left afterwards.

The oiling was not “pleasurable”, nor did I experience euphoria or any other kind of altered state for several weeks after its application.

Although Sathya Sai Baba did not tell me what the oil was for, he materialized the oil just after telling me about a severe gastrointestinal illness I endured (from which I lost a significant amount of weight in a short period of time) and after confirming to me that I should observe celibacy. Baba knew about my question concerning celibacy and my illness although I said nothing to him or anyone else at the ashram.

These are the facts of the matter. I think my statements (which have not changed in all these years) supersede the libelous, sexually-twisted, defamatory and deceitful claims made by Ex-Devotees against me, (who go around claiming I was sexually abused and fondled when I was not). Since my oiling experience does not fit into critic’s preconceived ideas about oilings (none of the currently vocal critics ever claimed having received one), they attempt to misrepresent and twist my words with sexual inferences. This speaks volumes about ex-devotees, their lack of character, their lack of dedication to the truth and their very disturbing sexual focus/perversity on everything relating to Sathya Sai Baba.

Ex-Devotees invalidate everything I say (all the while calling me a “liar”) yet apparently believe me when I said I had an oiling. They cherry-pick their criticisms to advance their own nefarious agendas and attempt to deceive the general public by harping on sincerity, honesty, morality and ethics! If ex-devotees lie like this about me, what does this say about their claims against Sathya Sai Baba?

Reference (or View The August 27th 2007 Archive)

The facts show that Moreno did make the clarifications that Robert Priddy demanded from him (although Priddy is in no position to make any demands from Moreno). As stated before, Robert Priddy will never be satisfied with Moreno’s clarifications and will continually resort to the “he is too embarrassed to talk about it” argument.

If Robert Priddy fabricates sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims is he fabricating as well?

When Robert Priddy believes that even those who deny being sexually molested were sexually molested, then one can better understand why Moreno refers to Robert Priddy as an “extremist”, a “fanatic”, a “pathological liar” and a “mentally unstable defamer”.

However, Moreno will make a few additional clarifications for interested readers:

1. Isn’t it strange that for someone who is alleged to have been “embarrassed” about being “molested sexually”, Moreno revealed the full details of his interview experience with Sathya Sai Baba on a public website (Ref)? Surely, if Moreno was so “embarrassed” about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, he would not have publicly mentioned it in the first place!


2. Sathya Sai Baba did not “gesture” or say “in words” for Moreno to lower his pants as graphically fantasized by Robert Priddy. As stated numerous times before, Moreno’s pants were never (ever) pulled down, loosened or touched.


3. Sathya Sai Baba did not (at any time) “put his hand inside” Moreno’s pants as graphically fantasized by Robert Priddy.


4. Moreno did not “want at any cost to escape any idea that he was being ‘groomed’ to see if he would rise to the approach” as graphically fantasized by Robert Priddy. Since Moreno’s genitals were never exposed or touched and since Sathya Sai Baba just finished confirming to Moreno that he should observe celibacy...how was that supposed to happen?

Robert Priddy’s arguments against Moreno are indicative of the type of conspiracy mentality and extremist mindset that makes him so utterly unbelievable. Robert Priddy would have the world believe that even those who deny being sexually molested, were. Robert Priddy would also have the world believe that his shabby conspiracies, fabricated statements and screwball speculations somehow trump Moreno’s first-hand comments and explanations!

Of course, Robert Priddy is the same guy who would have the world believe that his LSD-induced experiences were not hallucinatory in nature (although LSD is a hallucinogen)! Apparently, his telepathic connection with Eric Steadman, his “out of body experience” and his vision of broken bones sticking out of flesh from a broken wrist were not hallucinatory at all!...Which brings us back to Robert Priddy’s hallucinations about Joe Moreno & Sathya Sai Baba...The stuff drugs do to people’s brains!