Robert Priddy's Perverted Friends

ROBERT PRIDDY AND ALAN KAZLEV
Robert Priddy is a staunch defender, promoter and endorser of M. Alan Kazlev and referenced (many times) Kazlev's error-filled articles against me.

It has since come to light that Alan Kazlev is a morally debauched defamer who loves to drool over images of a “pornographic kind” (according to Robert Priddy’s moral standards: Ref) and wrote two cyberpunk articles replete with filthy speech and sexually explicit material. See:

- syndorphin2-6-C by M. Alan Kazlev or View Syndorphin 2-6-C Blogged Post

- Hap New Year by M. Alan Kazlev or View Hap New Year Blogged Post

Of course, when Anti-Sai Activists post "images of a pornographic kind" (See: 01 - 02 - 03), Robert Priddy is no where to be found and thus "one must conclude that in passively accepting critics perversions, untruths and defamations, Priddy is satisfied with them".

ROBERT PRIDDY AND SANJAY DADLANI:
Robert Priddy is a staunch defender, promoter and endorser of Sanjay Dadlani (Ref) and prominently linked to his blog and defended him on Wikipedia.

Robert Priddy (who blathers about morality and ethics) sees absolutely nothing wrong with Sanjay Dadlani’s homosexual-fantasizing slurs, perverted Jesus-sex fetish and deviant boot-sex fetish. Sanjay Dadlani secretly stalked innocent women at Middlesex University (calling them “bitches” and “sluts”, saying “they want it”, calling Mothers “MILFs”, photographing females and teenagers up their dresses and under tables and published these photos on his streetbitches blog). This is the type of person that Robert Priddy promotes, link to and endorses.

Sanjay Dadlani even posted on the QuickTopic Forum (using multiple fake names, including female names) and made disgusting posts under the name “Marquis de Sade” about a large penis for anal sex, a feces-covered anus, bestiality, people vomiting into each other’s mouths and a Priest ejaculating on the face of a little girl as related by her brother. Sanjay even posted under the name “kick his head in” and said that someone should murder Sathya Sai Baba (of course, this is the same guy who rejoiced when a Sai Baba temple was bombed).

ROBERT PRIDDY AND REINIER VAN DER SANDT:
Robert Priddy is a staunch defender, promoter and endorser of Reinier Van Der Sandt (webmaster for the ExBaba website) and he advertises his Anti-Sai website on Reinier's Anti-Sai website and they jointly attack Sai Devotees. This is what Reinier Van Der Sandt had to say about his child-pornography exploits on the internet:

"I found lots of kiddy porno-sites with very much child porn pics, but…, but… it was impossible for me to watch it for very long, because when I was clicking on an image to enlarge, other pages were popping up so fast on my computer screen, that I could not open such a site, in fact, all kiddy porno sites - as what I have seen of it - have multi pop up techniques, which makes it difficult for the kiddy porno watcher to watch easily…Only in the opening pages I saw some kiddy porn, when I wanted to continue and see more, I had to suscribe and/or pay…Internet kiddy porno can be obtained, I have to correct myself on what I was previously writing on this board, I have been looking for kiddy porn on the internet - NOT AS A CUSTOMER, BUT BECAUSE I WANTED TO FIND OUT WHETHER ONE CAN OBTAIN EASILY FILTHY KIDDIE PORNO!!!" (Refs: Original - Duplicate)

Reinier’s comments about viewing child pornography are very disturbing and I challenge any parent to tell me otherwise. Reinier Van Der Sandt found "lots of kiddie porno sites", "wanted to continue and see more" and even tried to "enlarge" pictures of children being sexually abused. Reinier Van Der Sandt justified his behavior by saying what he did was alright because he was "not a customer" (as if child-porn purveyors are "customers"). The IWF specifically states that child pornography is illegal content.

IS ROBERT PRIDDY OFFENDED BY 'SEXUALLY EXPLICIT LANGUAGE'?
Robert Priddy falsely accused me on Wikipedia of using "sexually explicit language" on Yahoo Groups. Although Priddy cannot cite even one post where I used "sexually explicit language", he completely ignored and dismissed the hundreds (possibly over a thousand) of posts from Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, UsedByBaba and Barbara Dent that are full of "sexually explicit language". Robert Priddy also does not seem to have any moral qualms with Alan Kazlev's "sexually explicit" cyberpunk stories, one which said (in part):

"laffing screaming cheering shouting stinka sweat piss vomit alcohol emjay tripweed making my head spin hot sticky SHOOD OLE QUAINTANCE BEE FORGOHHHT this spunky topless babe long hair flouro glo-in-dark make-up mega spunky tits shirt tied in her belt outa nowhere gives me great big kiss kiss soft lips smella sweat and pheronomes grinds her hips into mine sus my dicks gonna burst thru my pants wrap my arms round her bare back pork her fuck her up the vag in the new year strobing crazy head spinning scene she laffs and breaks strobes blinks free some dude in moir jacket maybe her fuck grabs her patterns whirlings strobing reinforcing through tripweed smoke fuck this strobing everything coming in jerks making me wanna puke drink HappyO drink HappyO HappyO the fun drink where's that babe gone?...'Fuck ya ya cunt!' 'Yeah happy new year cunt!' 'Happy new year yaself ya cunt!'...I hold her hands on her back she's got the front of her OutLawz ballistic duster unbuttoned and all she got is a bra and shorts on underneath, cos it so hot and all, man this turns me on my cock's a throbbing point of agony ecstasy wanna fuck fuck FUCK her right here right this here right now she breaks away I open eyes she's all big beautiful smile sexy legs little dayglo bright pink shorts black bra big tits merges strobes into the crowd like she never was...'Fuckin slut! Whadda beed doin!' He grabs her wrist. 'Fuckin turn away two sec ya lipdockin some cuhn!' Twists her arm."

Alan Kazlev's "sexually explicit language" pales in comparison to that used by Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O'Clery and Barbara Dent. You won't find a single word from Robert Priddy castigating his friends about their proven "sexually explicit language" and perversions.

This is the guy who is attempting to take a moral and ethical stand against Sathya Sai Baba! As I have said many times before, Robert Priddy is not credible. Not only is he not credible, he is also a hypocrite.

Robert Priddy's Telepathic Claims

ROBERT PRIDDY'S TELEPATHIC CLAIMS

Robert Priddy claimed that when he was a devotee of the Indian Guru Sri Sathya Sai Baba, he shared a telepathic and psychic connection to him. So convinced was Robert Priddy of Sai Baba's inexplicable psychic abilities, he documented several of his alleged experiences in his Pro-Sai Book, Source Of The Dream:

Source Of The Dream Page 68: I formulated my prayer in words, including just what sadhana or spiritual practices I would promise to carry out in the future if my condition should allow it. On this I concentrated as deeply as I could, in silence and with eyes closed, for perhaps 30 minutes.

When I felt it time to open them and look, there was Baba, twenty-five yards off, instantly turning on his heel and hurrying over toward me. Coming close, he fixed me with one sympathetic brown eye as if to say, “Agreed then?” and the stopped to stand firmly and wave his right hand. A dozen hands shot out eagerly from all around me. He beckoned me to put mine out and then his own easily found a space through the jumble of outstretched hands as if they were simply not there. The very fine-grained vibuthi fell down exactly into my palm. Sai Baba flicked his thumb, and I saw it send a large speck onto the hand of a tall Swedish boy beside me, with whom I had become acquainted during our stay there. I could not see that so much as a grain was spilled!

Source Of The Dream Page 70: One morning, seeing that Sai baba was unexpectedly visible in the compound, I hurried to the men’s gate and on the way had to pass the temple’s central entrance. As I did so, I clasped my hands in greeting and, to my surprise, saw that Baba was actually standing right in the line of my greeting, under the roof of the porch some thirty yards away. He was standing sideways to me and talking to a man, but his head turned instantly in response to my namaksar and he regarded me for some moments. It was very unexpected and, not knowing why, I moved a little and repeated my greeting. Again he turned immediately and looked at me - a striking instance of his extraordinary awareness and wordless communication.

Source Of The Dream Page 71: Meanwhile, I was still uncertain about all this at afternoon darshan and was hoping for some sign to confirm that I need not bother about church services. I saw a smile flicker across Sai Baba’s face as he passed me. After a brief round of the compound, he was soon hidden from my view by the pillars of the crowded porch. I thought to myself, “He must be standing there just about where he was when he acknowledged my greeting.” Just then, his torso popped into view, bent forward at a right angle, and he looked right toward me.

Source Of The Dream Pages 71 & 72: That day he also answered some questions of a very private nature, which I tried putting to him mentally as he sat on his chair keeping the beat for the music during the afternoon bhajans in the temple. With my background in logic and scientific skepticism, I was very loath to accept interpretations of meanings or significances that are not securely founded in the facts of a matter, and all the less so where vital personal matters are at stake! Still, I was already convinced that Sai Baba is telepathic, and the answers he gave each question, immediately, by looking straight at me with expressive and affirmative nods and one negative head-shake, were so unmistakably for me - even though I sat amid a hundred others - that I had to marvel at the ease and clarity of the communication.

In fact, one of the questions about a spiritual goal sprang into my mind unannounced. This question was of a nature that I had never even contemplated before and came ready-worded in a symbolic way that was very unlike my way of thinking - yet I found I had already “asked” it of him unthinkingly (not my way at all!). His very definitive nod came a split second later. This left me surprised and befuddled, but also very grateful too! I am convinced that he actually put the idea into my mind and influenced me to ask it! Following the example and advice of close devotees, I keep to myself the content of interchanges that are close to the heart, as in this case.

Source Of The Dream Page 117: One evening the bhajans went on into the dusk. Baba came out and walked along about ten yards away from my place at the rear of those seated on the sand. As he came opposite me, though it was too dark to see his eyes at that distance, I sensed that he was looking straight at me, and as if in confirmation of that fact, I saw two pinpricks of light shining in his eyes! It was a striking “physical impossibility,” and even would have been so had there been artificial lighting around, yet there was not, and I definitely saw these pinpoints fixed on me! In retrospect, I marvel how, with that leela, the tailor episode, and several other subtle but unmistakable signs, he was evidently ensuring that my expectations were to reach a maximum buildup.

Source Of The Dream Page 142: Though I had long believed in Baba’s many miraculous manifestations, I had now physically witnessed quite a few. Because some people are incurable skeptics who yet zealously believe that they know in advance what is and is not possible, even the old adage, “Seeing is believing” does not always hold true. Yet there is a difference between believing and seeing at first hand. I now therefore had the personal experience for confirming to others that these physical phenomena are empirical fact, not just something I believed in, at second hand, from the testimony of others...

I “presented” my plan for approval one day during bhajans in the temple by asking Sai Baba to give a sign if he approved and give it the moment I mentally asked for the answer. Indeed, he looked my way immediately, looking at me where I sat many rows back amid a hundred people and giving some satisfied nods.

Source Of The Dream Page 164: Since out previous visit, the only thing I had thought I would ask of Swami in an interview, if I got the opportunity, was to sing the bhajan “Love Is My Form” for us. I had seen the Italian film Love Is My Form, in which he sang it in the interview room in a sweet and soft voice that appealed particularly to me. As if in answer to this six-month-old unexpressed thought, Swami suddenly began signing it...but in even softer and sweeter tones than in the film - like a small innocent boy!

Source Of The Dream Page 178: Thus, Sai Baba communicates with exactitude, precision and timing across time, proving how he knew the idiosyncrasies of my mind. Every gesture, every word he addresses to anyone, it seems, has a meaning that will be clear sooner or later, even a meaning within a meaning. This helps one penetrate matters, both through deep self-analysis and contemplation of facts.

Source Of The Dream Page 180: On an occasion in the Prashanti temple, sitting cross-legged amid a large crown during bhajans and feeling severe shoulder and neck problems, I sent a mental prayer to Baba, who was seated about twenty yards off before me. Directly his eyes looked straight toward me and he put his hand on his own shoulder, exactly where my aches were worst.

Amusingly, this is not the first time that Robert Priddy claimed a telepathic connection to another person. Robert Priddy also claimed he shared an "unspoken telepathic awareness" with his friend Eric Steadman when he tripped on LSD (Ref).

Robert Priddy's alleged telepathic and psychic connections with Sathya Sai Baba inspired him to write the following words:

Source Of The Dream Page 201: Some societies in northern Europe are now so fundamentally materialistic in thought and belief, so uninformed even about paranormal facts that have been well-known in other cultures and throughout history, that most of their members have been educated into cynicism and cultural bigotry. I leaned somewhat in that direction myself when I was a much younger and less experienced fool than I may appear to be now. While studying philosophy and science, my views tended at times toward the academic norm and the intellectual’s peculiar brand of misplaced and commonplace common sense, which I now recognize as most unhealthy in the long run, because it conceals from oneself the very purpose of life, or even that there is one! On two occasions already related, when people who had been in India and experienced some of the wonders of Sai Baba came to tell me about it, my supposed breadth of scholarly achievement and comprehensive reading, etc. etc., kept me from following up on the matter. Now that I am at the other end of the stick, I can sympathize with those who continue for whatever reason to forego the opportunity and thus lose many precious years of access to the marvel and the love of Baba.

Source Of The Dream Page 202: Baba has established in me what I feel to be an unshakeable faith in the omnipresence of the Divine, including its reflection in other people - and myself. Furthermore, a sense of security in the cosmos and confidence before the world and all its ills has increased, and indeed passed a threshold some years ago, so that I am now convinced that I will not lose it. And, not least, I have gained growing insight into the challenges presented by my altered physical and social circumstances, for the consequent redirection of my activities and mind have, in fact, much improved the quality of my life. In all, I now flow with life more easily, find pressures have relaxed from within, and have also been able to know the self-fulfillment of realizing certain of my dearest dreams. All this grace, through Baba’s love, is beyond repayment, I feel, by any other form of thanks than following up his call as best I can.

Even after his defection from the Sai Movement, Robert Priddy had the following to say about Sai Baba's paranormal powers:

"Some of what I experienced of SSB's extraordinary and positive powers through many years is undeniable, even after the most rigorous skeptical investigations, and I do not regard him as any ordinary human being. I have simply had to realize that his actions in the worldly and human sphere are not infallible and are not always setting a perfect example for others."

Robert Priddy also believes that Sai Baba has "inexplicable psychic powers", is "psychically sensitive" and can materialize "apports".

Although Robert Priddy was never sexually abused and never witnessed an incident of alleged abuse, he gullibly believed all the Anti-Sai stories he read on the internet. Almost immediately, Robert Priddy undertook an aggressive and feral Anti-Sai Campaign, utilizing online propaganda, rhetoric and even outright prevarication to revenge his being "defrauded" by Sai Baba.

The fact of the matter is that Robert Priddy is not credible. He is obsessed, bitter, angry and dishonest. For further reading, see: Vishvarupa.com: Robert Priddy - Oslo, Norway.

RobertPriddy - Blogged Articles

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Blog Index Of Articles So Far:

Miscellaneous Articles About Robert C. Priddy
- Priddy's Primary Webpage Indexed On Porn Sites
- Is Robert Priddy Well Funded?
- Robert & Kai Nicolai Priddy
- Robert Priddy - The Pseudo-Moralist
- Robert Priddy's Pro/Anti Sai Baba Books
- Another Example Of Priddy's Poor Research
- Priddy's Shameless Lie About Joy Thomas
- Priddy's Disreputable Air-Signaller Training
- Robert Priddy's Fraudulent Information
- Materialized Green Diamond Rings?
- V.K. Narasimhan And Sathya Sai Baba
- Robert Priddy's Penchant For Prevarication
- Sathya Sai Baba
- Bogus "Photographic Evidence" Claim
- David Bailey? Really?
- Robert Priddy And His "Babafan" Lie
- Related Blogs - Exposing The Exposers
- Robert Priddy's Phony "Phone" Lies
- Source Of The Homoerotic Dreams?
- Robert Priddy's Moon Madness
- Robert Priddy And The saibaba.org.uk Domain
- Robert Priddy's Man In The Moon
- Robert Priddy Lies Again About Joe Moreno
- The Wax Lingam MIRACLE!
- To Be Or Not To Be Anonymous
- Robert Priddy's Gullible / Brainwashed Years
- Robert Priddy - The Hinduism Basher

Wikipedia Blunders:
- Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again
- Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
- Say What?
- Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
- Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie
- Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt
- A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder

Defamatory Attacks Addressed:
- Defamatory Attack One: Response 1
- Defamatory Attack Two: Response 2
- Defamatory Attack Three: Response 3

Disempowerment Articles & Responses:
- Robert Priddy: Response 1
- Robert Priddy: Response 2
- Robert Priddy: Response 3
- Robert Priddy: Response 4
- Robert Priddy: Response 5
- Robert Priddy: Response 6

Robert Priddy On QuickTopic:
- QuickTopic Deception By Robert Priddy

Robert Priddy's Drug Years:
- Robert Priddy & LSD: A Vision Of Cosmic Energy
- Robert Priddy's LSD Trip Beyond The Mind
- Robert Priddy Psychedelic Drug Years

- Robert Priddy's Drug Years - An Overview

Source Of The Homoerotic Dreams?

When Robert Priddy was a Sai Devotee for 17 - 26 years, he gave tremendous importance to his dreams (especially those relating to the Indian Guru Sathya Sai Baba). Firmly believing that his Sai-related dreams were direct psychic contacts with the Guru, Robert Priddy wrote a Pro-Sai book entitled “Source Of The Dream - My Way To Sathya Sai Baba” in which he related numerous dreams, scouring every aspect of his life and memory to attribute meaning and significance to them.

Robert Priddy claimed that Sai Baba cured him of a chronic spinal problem through a series of “dream-operations” that resulted in a literal and physical transformation of his spine. Robert Priddy said of Mr. Kylie (“an osteopath and master of various other disciplines”):

“Almost at once he claimed that neither of the two sets of my X rays from different years were mine, because in them the lower spine was in a much more serious condition than I proved to have when he examined it physically. It showed an excessive curvature and a lower vertebra that was badly and permanently displaced. He was even surprised that I was able to walk about with it! Without any comment whatsoever from me he remarked, ‘I would have staked my professional reputation that these X rays are not yours!’ However, my name was photographed into each one. He asked me what on earth I had been doing - how the great improvement in my spine was achieved. I told him I had hardly been able to walk much of the time, let alone exercise. He shook his head and said, most perplexed, that anyway there was simply no method or exercises he knew whereby I could have made the condition so much better...It was not until afterward that I remembered the dream of the operation ‘under anesthesia’ and the bandages on my thighs and mid-riff on either side of the crisis point in my lower spine! Before the ‘rat in the drum’ episode I had even been unable to walk about the house for long without having to lie down. Yet within a month I had gone to India, sitting on airplanes and walking for hours in a day without more than a few tensions! Though I had felt sure that Baba was helping me, I had not realized how radical a change this had required to my anatomy!...I am of the opinion that through my illness I am working off karma from a previous lifetime. I am concerned that it should not be healed only temporarily (i.e., postponed) by whatever means, but that I should be able to suffer it through now, while I have the spiritual support of the living avatar himself.” (Source Of The Dream; “Enigmas of Suffering and Healing”; pp: 179, 181)

Among Sai literature, one can find a variety of stories relating to alleged cures and healings effected through “dream operations” from Sai Baba. Therefore, this type of paranormal phenomena was not unique to Robert Priddy.

After Robert Priddy defected from the Sai Movement, he wrote an Anti-Sai book entitled “End Of The Dream - The Sathya Sai Baba Enigma”. Robert Priddy now believes that all Sai-related dreams are the direct result of one’s subconscious focus, desires and projections.

Therefore, what do the following two dreams reveal about Robert Priddy and his subconscious focus, desires and projections?

“In another (dream) he took my head and neck on his lap, where I rested it fully as he stroked away the pressures.” (Source Of The Dream; “Enigmas of Suffering and Healing”, pp. 174-175)

“Dream of August 18, 1985: I was in our living room with Reidun and my son Kai. Baba came in and spoke to them, whereupon they withdrew to another room. He came over to, bent forward to where I sat, and put his mouth on mine. He breathed into my lungs long, slowly and very deeply, then drew the breath out of me again. I was able to perceive a sort of brownish, gaseous fluid being drawn up from the very root of the spine (the muladhara chakra). This poisonous substance was fully drained off, and Sai Baba looked at me as he swallowed it, appearing momentarily just like the imposing Shiva with a blue throat and the characteristic pile of hair.

Comment: I awoke, immediately, very early in the morning. The experience in the dream left a very strong impression on me. The meaning of the ‘kiss of life’ in life-saving is symbolic, so the dream suggests that my life was saved...What ailment it was that this ‘dream operation’ can have cured me of is uncertain, but I had been awakening at night in a feverish sweat and a truly awful sensation that some sort of poison was gradually rising up my spine. It was so real to me, even though the sensation went away when I awoke, that I felt that it could even mean death if it rose much futher up the spinal column. The last time it occurred, just days before the dream, I had called out for help from Sai Baba and had also taken several spoons of amrit (which we saved from my visit to the temple where it issued from a locket)...Yet I have not experienced the feverish and painful awakening from ‘rising poison’ again.” (Source Of The Dream; “Enigmas of Suffering and Healing”, pp. 174-175)

Since Robert Priddy now contends that Sai Baba is a fraud, then it would appear that his dreams were the result of his desires and projections. Such being the case, one is left to wonder why Robert Priddy would desire to lay his head on Sai Baba’s lap, imagining Sai Baba to “stroke away the pressures”. One is also left to wonder why Robert Priddy would desire Sai Baba to kiss him on the mouth and draw up impurities associated with his “muladhara chakra” (the subtle “sex center” often associated with sexual energy, sexual desire and the genitals).

Using Alan Kazlev’s pseudo-psychologist reasoning (that he used against me), perhaps Robert Priddy saw Sai Baba as a “pretend homosexual lover” and “much loved surrogate father figure”. This is not far fetched because Robert Priddy admitted he did not have a stable father figure in his life (which he divulged in his writings). Since Robert Priddy has never dissented with Alan Kazlev’s bogus psychological-profiling against me, then I see no reason why I cannot cite Alan Kazlev and apply Kazlev’s reasoning to him and his apparent homoerotic dreams.

Anti-Sai Activists can often be seen insinuating sexual impropriety against Sai Baba over mundane and very public events. For example, see rfjvds.dds.nl/movies/saibabamovies.html. On that page, Reinier Van Der Sandt (and whoever helped him create the page) suggested that Sai Baba was being attended by “boys boys boys” and insinuated that a male devotee purposely put his head near Sai Baba’s groin and that Sai Baba smiled because of it. Therefore, I see no reason why I cannot similarly interpret critic’s behavior using the same standards they apply to Sai Baba.

Robert Priddy’s apparent homoerotic dreams would perhaps explain why he is so strongly infatuated obsessed with Sai Baba. Perhaps Robert Priddy is projecting his self-hate, fear, irrationality and negativity about his subconscious and latent homosexual desires onto Sai Baba? Why else would Robert Priddy subconsciously dream of Sai Baba kissing him on the mouth and drawing up impurities from his sex-chakra and swallowing them? Robert Priddy is a big advocate of “projection” and believes that Sai Devotees essentially “project” divinity, holiness and purity onto Sai Baba. So why is it that Sai Devotees are trapped in their “positive projections”, yet Robert Priddy denies (and refuses to address) his “negative projections”, which seem to revolve mostly around sex?

Amusingly, Robert Priddy had a former Indian Guru (a Swami of the Ramakrishna Mission to whom Priddy attributed numerous psychic phenomena) prior to coming to Sai Baba and entertained thoughts that the Swami was a womanizer. Apparently, this Swami foresaw the truth about Robert Priddy with amazing accuracy:

saiguru.net/english/articles/49-3writings.htm
“Only recently was I told that this Swami (since deceased), said to devotees of me that I was “very strong and also later, that I was a sceptic. A ‘septic tank’.” A typical nasty pun, doubtless used on all who rejected him as ‘the master’. This came from one of whom I always spoke about to others and wrote about very respectfully (as in my published book ‘Source of the Dream’ - praising SB, where I describe my relationship to him and to SB at the time).”

Although Robert Priddy can often be seen presenting himself as a self-righteous voice in the Anti-Sai Movement, he is a fierce defender and promoter of Sanjay Dadlani, who has been thoroughly exposed (with proof) as being a sexual deviant of the worst order. Robert Priddy casually dismisses all of Sanjay’s vulgarities and obscenities, yet whines and snivels about morality and ethics! Robert Priddy attacks Sathya Sai Baba with his typical gutter and venomous accusations emanating directly from his skeptic “septic tank”.

Robert Priddy also had the following to say about Sai-related dreams:

home.hetnet.nl/~ex_baba/engels/articles/dreams.html
“The phenomenon of ‘psychic invasion’ is widely reported in many connections, often with so-called ‘spiritual masters’ or gurus. Apparent invasive experience in dreams or waking ‘visions’ – both positive and negative - are usually considered to be symptoms of some form of mental ‘illness’ in many countries, and quite extreme malignant sorts of dream and vision are experienced as completely real by such persons as once regarded as having become ‘possessed’ by incarnate entities. One can however, be certain that phenomena exist and are widespread, but how the originate and how far they are the result of external forces or persons who are using ‘powers’ remains very controversial and largely not researchable by scientific methods thus far.”

Amusingly, since Robert Priddy had over 300 dreams of Sai Baba, he conceded that he displayed “symptoms of mental illness” when he was a Sai Devotee. As a matter of fact, Robert Priddy even related other Sai-related dreams after he defected from Sai Baba, furthering the case that he still suffers from “symptoms of mental illness”. It appears the only time Robert Priddy opens his mouth is to stick his other foot in it or to kiss Sai Baba in his dreams.

Reference

Robert Priddy's Moon Madness

Referenced from robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/deceiving-devotee-makes-bogus-image-of-sai-in-the-moon/

Robert Priddy wrote a blogged article about a Sai Devotee he erroneously accused of making a "bogus image of Sai in the Moon". The image in question is below:


Further sticking his foot in his mouth, Robert Priddy said:

"However, the falsifier who put together the deceptive image presented a completely circular moon. A wholly transparent fraudulence, in fact a wilful, and outright lie! Of course, had this occurred (except perhaps in the over-heated imagination of some devotees), it would have been global news story No. 1!"

Although Robert Priddy's numerous lies have been fully documented and exposed by me, he continues to fraudulently and shamelessly lie about other unapologetically. This type of vicious behavior proves that Robert Priddy is mentally unstable and is in need of orthodox psychological help.

Since Robert Priddy (the alleged and self-professed "scholar") is totally incapable of conducting even the most remedial and elementary or research, let me supply the general public with verifiable facts.

First of all, Darpan (the "Sai Devotee" referred to by Robert Priddy) fully admitted that the image was not real. Darpan said:

Sairam,

Dear all,
this is not a real image, but im sending what i could see and visualise, what we all saw yesterday looking at the moon. there was not need to imagine a shape or make a guess the visual on moon was as clear as the image im sending now. HIS hair, eyes, nose and even HIS smile was very clear.

Sairam,
enjoy! HIS blessings.
yours sincerley,
darpan (Reference)

Secondly, the SaiBabaOfIndia website linked the image directly to the post above. Click on the image for yourself (Reference). Anyone with any semblance of visual and mental acuity can see that the image in question is a composite and is not the Moon. Therefore, Robert Priddy's entire article is based on lies and fraudulent information that he never cared to research or verify for himself (which he can often be seen doing in relation to Sathya Sai Baba).

Robert Priddy loves to jump to the worst case conspiratorial view because he cares more for sensationalism and sleaze and cares less for accuracy and the truth.

Although Robert Priddy published Darpan's email, he apparently never contacted him to get his facts right. Robert Priddy also published Darpan's picture on his blog. What is strange about this is when I published Robert Priddy's public-domain picture on my website (Reference), he whined and hissed that I violated his copyrights. Although Robert Priddy continues to whine and hiss about the publication of his picture on my website (and how it violates his copyrights), he published Darpan's picture (without obtaining his permission) and saw absolutely nothing wrong with copyright issues. More shameless, self-serving hypocrisy from Robert "The Liar" Priddy.

Robert Priddy should immediately delete his defamatory post filled with numerous bold-faced lies and publicly apologize to Darpan. After all, this is exactly the type of behavior that critics demand of me when I make a mistake. They should practice the precept they wish for others to follow.

Reference

Robert Priddy And The saibaba.org.uk Domain

Robert Priddy’s Involvement With A Fraudulent UK Sai Baba Organisation Domain
Recently I was forwarded some links from the saibaba.org.uk website and was shocked to see that the pages contained Anti-Sai material (mostly written by Robert Priddy). The following screencap shows Google’s listings from the saibaba.org.uk domain:


It appears that the webpages were deleted because the domain fraudulently attempted to pass itself off as the official Sathya Sai Seva Organisation in the UK. The official domain for the UK Sathya Sai Service Organisation is srisathyasai.org.uk.

The UK WhoIs domain registry revealed that the person who registered the fraudulent saibaba.org.uk domain did so anonymously on August 16th 2006. The following screencaps show how a couple of the meta-tags on the saibaba.org.uk website list Robert Priddy as being the copyright holder:



Robert Priddy Directly Associated With The Fraudulent saibaba.org.uk Domain:
The following screencaps prove that Robert Priddy is directly and explicitly associated with the fraudulent saibaba.org.uk domain.

Robert Priddy duplicated an article from Barry Pittard on his Anti-Sai website located at: home.no.net/anir/Sai/enigma/barry1.htm?FACTNet.


After 10 seconds, this webpage redirected to saibaba.org.uk/20/barryexcerpt.htm (which has subsequently been deleted).


After viewing Robert Priddy’s HTML source code, there is meta-tag ‘refresh’ script that redirects the page directly to the saibaba.org.uk domain. Needless to say, the only person who can insert the meta-tag ‘refresh’ script into the HTML is the owner and creator of the webpage in question. In this case, that owner and creator is Robert Priddy.


Currently, there is no other known Anti-Sai website or ex-devotee associated with the saibaba.org.uk domain besides Robert Priddy. It is also important to point out that by redirecting links to the saibaba.org.uk domain, web-traffic is lost to the old website when it is re-directed to the new website. Why would Robert Priddy redirect his webpage (and thereby his web-traffic) to another domain if that domain is not his?

Robert Priddy’s Clinical Obsession With Sathya Sai Baba
After years of making absolutely no leeway against Sathya Sai Baba, Robert Priddy has begun to gnash his teeth, foam-at-the-mouth and raise a huge cry by duplicating his repetitive Anti-Sai slop on no less than 5 Anti-Sai domains and 1 (so far known) Anti-Sai blog.

As of September 2007, R.C. Priddy wrote 117 blogged articles against Sathya Sai Baba in 8 months. That is one new article every other day for eight months straight! Apparently, Robert Priddy has no other work, is clinically obsessed with Sai Baba and is trapped in his negative projections about his former Guru.

Now, there is proof that Robert Priddy attempted to publish his Anti-Sai material on a bogus and fraudulent UK Sai Baba Organisation domain. Robert Priddy is an Anti-Sai extremist and fanatic who relies on spam, propaganda and deceit because the truth does not argue in his favor. Robert Priddy’s motto and methodology is “deceive the naive”. This tactic may have worked in the past when he and other critics went unchallenged for years, but it isn’t working now.

Robert Priddy is finally being held accountable for his actions and words.

October 26th 2007 Update: saibaba.org.uk Domain Belongs To Robert Priddy
After I emailed Robert Priddy about his involvement with the fraudulent saibaba.org.uk domain, he published the following statement on the index page:

Robert Priddy created yet another Anti-Sai domain at saibaba-x.org.uk (which mirrors the content on his five other Anti-Sai websites). It is amusing that Robert Priddy attempts to deceive others into thinking that he resides in the UK. He does not. He resides in Oslo Norway. See domain info:

Domain name: saibaba-x.org.uk

Registrant: -

Registrant type: Unknown

Registrant’s address: Agathe Grondahlsgate 2b, Oslo 0478 NO

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 20-Aug-2007
Renewal date: 20-Aug-2009

Reference

Robert Priddy's Man In The Moon

On Wikipedia, the “Man In The Moon” article contains the following information:

“The ‘Man in the Moon’ is a mythical figure resembling a human face, perceived in the full Moon in some cultures. The figure is composed of large dark areas (the lunar maria, or seas) on the Moon’s surface. The figure’s eyes are the Mare Imbrium and Mare Serenitatis, its nose is the Sinus Aestuum, and its open mouth is the Mare Nubium and Mare Cognitum.

The conventionalized image of the Man in the Moon, unlike the vague natural appearance, bears just a very simple, wide-grinning face.

The Man in the Moon is an example of pareidolia. Other cultures perceive the silhouette of a woman, a hare, a frog, moose, or a buffalo in the full moon.

The Nepalese have a tradition that the dead go to the Moon.

In Japan and Korea, popular culture sees a rabbit making mochi and Tteok, respectively, in the moon.

Shia Muslims believe that name of Maulana Ali Ibne-Abi Talib (Muhammad’s son in law) is written on the moon. This interpretation has roots in several sayings (hadith) by Muhammad where he compares Ali with the Moon and himself to Sun. The notion is that Ali’s teaching is the light that shall guide the muslims after Muhammad has departed. There are also other esoteric interpretation of this analogy in islamic philosophy.” (Ref)

The following pictures contain outlines to supposed figures on the Moon along with the infamous Man On The Moon figure:



As one can see, these moon figures are rather vague and are very difficult to perceive without the outlines. However, as Robert Priddy (an ex-devotee) pointed out, there is a very strange and distinct outline on the Moon that is easily perceivable in relation to Sathya Sai Baba. Robert Priddy made several comments about Sathya Sai Baba and the “Man In The Moon” on his Anti-Sai blog and even published the following image:


When looking at the full Moon, one can clearly see an outline of a face within another outline of afro-like hair. When Sathya Sai Baba’s face (minus his hair) is put into the Moon’s empty face-outline, one can easily perceive how the Moon’s afro-like hair outline completes his look. See the following images for examples:





Although I am unsure how many people will support Robert Priddy’s comparison between Sathya Sai Baba and the “Man In The Moon”, I find it strange that he sees his former guru in the Moon, obsesses about his former guru on almost a daily basis and can’t seem to move beyond his anger and bitterness in relation to his former guru. It most certainly appears that Robert Priddy (while constantly howling at the Moon about Sathya Sai Baba) has gone mad. Needless to say, when Robert Priddy was a Sai Devotee, he saw Sathya Sai Baba In The Clouds and In His Green Stone Ring. Who knows where Robert Priddy will next see Sathya Sai Baba and what laughs he will bring us when he does?

Reference

Robert Priddy Lies Again About Joe Moreno

On digg.com Robert Priddy said (under his oxymoronic name “truthpromoter”):

“To defend my reputation in advance it has become necessary to point out how every posting made by any ex-devotee anywhere on the Internet is followed wherever possible by defamatory comments by GM108 or joe108 (Gerald Moreno) fanatical web-stalker who posts links to side-issues, libel and his trivialities daily. Employed full-time doing dirty tricks to defend Sai Baba and his Organisation. He twists the truth to claim that I am stalking HIM, but I have made no blogs about him (as he has about me) nor any webpages against him (which he has on a grand scale against me!). I am simply warning against his libels.”

Robert Priddy has yet to refute what he calls my “side-issues”, “libel” and “trivialities”. I FULLY reference my articles, unlike Robert Priddy who simply denies, deflects and foams-at-the-mouth (as can be seen by his comments on the screen-cap above). The only person “employed full-time” and using “dirty tricks” to attack Sathya Sai Baba is Robert Priddy (as can be seen on his six Anti-Sai Websites). The reason why I have so many webpages about Robert Priddy is because my thorough documentation of his massive fraudulence is very well established.

Robert Priddy said (about me):

“I have made no blogs about him (as he has about me) nor any webpages against him.”

Needless to say, this is yet another bold-faced untruth from Robert C. Priddy. Take a look at the following webpages where Robert Priddy directly and specifically attacks me. Some of his comments are many paragraphs in length and one webpage anonymously defames me and makes numerous unsupported comments against me:

1. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/head.htm


2. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/


3. home.no.net/anir/Sai/enigma/SSO%20publicity.htm


4. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/EX-OFFICE%20BEARERS.htm


5. home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg0.htm


6. home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg1.htm


7. home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg3.htm


8. home.chello.no/~reirob/geodata.htm


9. home.no.net/abacusa/T/stooge.htm


10. gethome.no/~reirob/CovUp4.htm


11. gethome.no/~reirob/sorg2.htm

Robert Priddy created an anonymous website attempting to libel me on angeltowns2 and they terminated his account for defamatory content and for violating their terms and conditions (Refs: 01 - 02). Robert Priddy also attacked me anonymously on the QuickTopic forum using the fake name “bandbox” (Reference). Robert Priddy lied about me on a public forum and I responded to his untruths in my article entitled Robert Priddy And His ‘Babafan’ Lie. In addition to these, Robert Priddy made numerous gutter untruths against me on Wikipedia. See:

• A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder


• Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa DeWitt


• Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed


• Another Unsupported Lie From Robert Priddy


• Say What? More Lies From Anti-Sai’s


• Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again

Therefore, when Robert Priddy said “I have made no blogs about him (as he has about me) nor any webpages against him”, he lied because his numerous comments, libels and defamations against me are not only published on his Anti-Sai Webpages, they are fully recorded on Wikipedia and other public forums.

Robert Priddy also solicits and promotes the defamatory blog of Sanjay Dadlani (who has been fully exposed for his trashy and kinky killuminati blog, streetbitches blog, his Jesus sex fetish and his QuickTopic Deceptions).

Robert Priddy also promotes Alan Kazlev’s defamatory pages against me in which he plays the role of bogus psychiatrist (because he has no credentials in the medical or mental health fields). It is also amusing that Robert Priddy promotes Alan Kazlev when Priddy made fun of the “lunatic fringe” often seen in cults and religious movements (Reference).

As I have said many times before, the more Robert Priddy says, the less I have to defend. Robert Priddy makes the case for me that he is a mentally unstable defamer who lies about others unapologetically (all the while harping on morality, ethics and honesty). Robert Priddy stands exposed, humiliated and ashamed, all from his own doing. He has no one else to blame but himself and no amount of deflection, foaming-at-the-mouth and denial will save him now.

MAJOR UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 13TH 2007
After publishing this page exposing Robert Priddy’s easily verifiable lie about not having created any webpages against me, Robert Priddy went about secretly deleting content against me (offering no explanations, apologies or retractions). The pages deleted or modified were:

1. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/head.htm


2. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/


3. home.no.net/anir/Sai/enigma/SSO%20publicity.htm


4. home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/EX-OFFICE%20BEARERS.htm


5. home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg0.htm


6. home.no.net/abacusa/T/stooge.htm

Robert Priddy is now (for the most part) including one paragraph garbling about Alan Kazlev’s webpage against me along with a link going to home.chello.no/~reirob/sorg0.htm#joe. The following screencaps show how information against me was published on the websites above. Another perfect example how Robert Priddy & Co. stealthily attempt to do damage control when their bold-faced lies are thoroughly exposed and documented:

Below: Screen Shots Of The Deleted Anonymous Webpage Against Joe Moreno (click on images to enlarge):

Below: Screen Shots Of The Deleted Anonymous Webpage Against Joe Moreno:

Below: Google Results Showing Joe Moreno’s Name:

Below: Before & After Screen Shots Showing Deleted Section:

Reference

The Wax Lingam MIRACLE!

Keeping in tune with my previous article about Robert Priddy’s gullibility when he was a Sai Devotee, I found the following “wax lingam” story in Priddy’s Pro-Sai book entitled “Source Of The Dream”:

“While compiling an extensive index of Baba’s words, Reidun and I were reading the texts and making notes daily. One evening, tired after a strenuous day, we felt like dropping it, but recalling Baba’s call to duty and self-discipline, we carried on with the work. The candle on our shrine must have burnt so low that we over-looked it when we retired for the night. The next morning, to our great perplexity, we saw that a small, green and perfectly-formed Shiva lingam, about one and a half centimeters in height, had formed from the candlewax. It must have dripped from the candle as the flame fradually sank and gutted out. The lingam was of tapering shape and even had ring-like markings, as seen in some Shiva temples. This was evidently a leela, because wax never ordinarily drips that way.My son Kai was intrigued and tried to work out the physics of it, coming up with the explanation that it could have formed by gradually smaller drips as the flame sank. Two weeks later a candle in his own flat also produced a lingam of the same size and color. However, the wax would have had to drip four times the distance in that case, which makes the physics of it incomprehensible. Perhaps the lingams were not formed by the drips at all? How the two lingams were of the same shade of green is also inexplicable. Incidentally, Kai had previously worked tirelessly on preparing a data program for making the index.” (Source Of The Dream, ‘The Universal World Teacher’, pg. 211-12)

Click On Thumbnails To View Full Sized Images


Indeed, the green wax lingam that formed on Robert Priddy’s candle-holder is unique and I have never seen dripping wax produce that type of shape before. The objective facts of the matter are that the lingam was made out of candle-wax and formed at the base of a candle holder that held a burning candle the night before it formed. Being unable to explain away the wax lingam, Robert Priddy intelligently, logically and rationally speculated (sarcasm implied) that perhaps the wax lingam was some sort of divine manifestation independent of the candle and its drippings.

Since it is Robert Priddy’s current belief that Sathya Sai Baba is a fraud, his Sai-Devotee speculations were indicative of his gulliblity, ‘true-believer’ state-of-mind, naivete and “backward intellectually” beliefs. However, the strange thing about it all is that Robert Priddy currently believes that Sathya Sai Baba does possess genuine paranormal powers, is psychically sensitive and can materialize apports.

Some of the reasons why Robert Priddy believes these things is because Sathya Sai Baba cured him of a debilitating and chronic neck and spinal problem that no one else could cure and whose symptoms no doctor could alleviate. Robert Priddy also claimed that Sathya Sai Baba’s freed his mother from chronic pain and that a small speck of Sathya Sai Baba’s vibuthi instantaneously cured his paralyzed cat when it suffered from what appeared to be a stroke.

Robert Priddy tries to make the case that Sathya Sai Baba is both a fraud and genuine, can materialize objects and fakes materializations and can cure diseases but really can’t. Trying to pass himself off as an intellectual who currently holds rationalistic beliefs, Robert Priddy miserably fails to explain away the enigma of Sathya Sai Baba, appears very confused and non-intelligent and ends up sticking his foot further into his mouth with his never-ending and very amusing equivocations.

To Be Or Not To Be Anonymous

Robert Priddy is a hypocritical equivocator who can’t make up his mind whether or not anonymous online identities are good or bad. Robert Priddy has no problem when he disperses numerous slurs, defamations, accusations, stories, “testimonies”, hearsay accounts, rumors, gossip and allegations from people who are completely anonymous on his Anti-Sai websites. However, when it comes to anonymous Sai Baba Proponents, Robert Priddy gnashes his teeth, foams at the mouth and raises a huge cry about how anonymity is a shield for “cowardly creatures hiding under a stone” and for people lacking “personal integrity”. Let us take a look at a few comments made by Robert Priddy about anonymity and anonymous online identities:

“Daren’t you put your name to your abusive comments. I see you are using different anonymous IPs - registered in Texas, but you are in UK I know.You got my mail and I reckon it stings to hear the truth.Perhaps you can explain why Sai Baba lied outright about me… that I do this for money, and that I am ‘jealous’ Ha ha!! You see, I KNOW he is a liar.

I was never disgruntled because of lack of attention - I had enough interviews and after I learned what he is really up (you know well what I mean!) to I would not want to go near him under any circumstances!

Pitiful that you haven’t the courage to stand forth like a man! So much for your personal integrity! Of course, your comments to Wordpress will never be posted… unless you should come to your senses.

Robert Priddy” (Reference)

home.chello.no/~reirob/saionline.htm
“Surnames and locations, if you please! I want to know who wrote this e-mail and takes full responsibility for it. If none of you dare so much even as to stand forth personally, you will be below contempt for the whole world of decent people out here. You still try to hide in anonymity behind an alleged ‘group’. In this way you still flaunt your ingenuousness and show that you have no understanding of how smears by nameless people affect the big world out here. So this is a big test for you. Come on, don’t be chicken-livered… full and controllable identities of every one of you… and no false names among them, mind you.”

home.hetnet.nl/~ex_baba/engels/guestbook/2005.html
“We are upright and not afraid, like you, Linda whoever you are… for you dare not even give your proper full name like all the many cowardly and cheap slanderers from the Sai camp (but your IP is 211.29.53.15 from Australia). “

hetnet.nl/~ex-baba/engels/letters/tosupportgroup.html
“You sign you e-mail ’support group’. In other words, an anonymous sender. Whether you are one person or a group, I wonder why you are unable to sign your name(s)? You may reply with full names and addresses, otherwise you will only prove to us that you are cowardly creatures hiding under a stone. “

However, when Robert Priddy used the anonymous online identity of “Lisa demoniser” on QuickTopic (Reference), not only did he attack a Sai Proponent anonymously, he defended the right of people to post anonymously on the internet! Robert Priddy said:

“You do not recognise the right of anonymity on the internet when it is to protect against demonisers like you claim to be! If anonymous posters are cowardly, then millions are cowards.” (Reference)

Of course, Robert Priddy’s comments directly contradict his former position that anonymous posters are “cowardly creatures hiding under a stone” and are people who lack “personal integrity”. Apparently, when Robert Priddy is posting under fake names and under the guise of anonymity, he thinks he is perfectly entitled to do so without being a “cowardly creature” or compromising his “personal integrity”.

Robert Priddy attempted to create an anonymous website attacking me on AngelTowns2 (Reference), but I recognized the folder name and easily identified him as the webmaster. Robert Priddy even attempted to post anonymously on Digg.com as “truthpromoter” and only divulged his name after I exposed his identity there. Robert Priddy posted anonymously on the QuickTopic forum using the names “Lisa demoniser” and “bandbox” (Reference).

However, Robert Priddy is not the only Anti-Sai Activist caught posting under multiple, fake and anonymous identities. Reinier Van Der Sandt posted under multiple fake names on the SathyaSaiBaba2 Yahoo Group and was forced to concede that he had engaged in dishonest behavior (Refs: 01 - 02). Robert Priddy, Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, Barbara Dent and UsedByBaba collectively posted under 90+ fake identities on QuickTopic (even using the names of Pro-Sai Activists, including my name: Reference).

You will not find even one single reprimand or apology from Robert Priddy about the proven fake names and anonymous posts made by Anti-Sai Activists. This proves that Robert Priddy is a hypocrite and a biased and bitter extremist who cannot reconcile his precept with practice. All Robert Priddy can do is blindly accuse others of “libel”, “dirty tricks” and “ad hominem” attacks without referencing or sourcing his comments to anything factual or verifiable.

This is the guy who is attempting to "expose" Sathya Sai Baba. The more Robert Priddy says, the less I have to defend. He makes the case for me that he is dishonest, bitter, vindictive and deeply conflicted. Thank you, Mr Priddles.

Reference