Robert Priddy Exposed

Exposing The Anti-Sai Extremist And Ex-Devotee Of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba.

Friday, June 12, 2009

Robert Priddy vs Richard Dawkins

ROBERT PRIDDY VS RICHARD DAWKINS

Robert Priddy & Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson
Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and thereby the Father who sent Jesus, Allah who sent Muhammad and the Creator of the Universe) is now being advertised on self-professed prophet & psychic medium Conny Larsson’s New Age Cult website Heart & Soul Expo.

Conny Larsson was one of the primary founding members to the Anti-Sai Movement who quickly began peddling himself as an internationally renowned trance medium, self-proclaimed Prophet & psychic healer just after he defected from the Sai Movement. Besides Conny Larsson’s vedicmasterclass.org and saibabaexpose.com domains, Conny Larsson is one of two “International Coordinators” (the other being Judith Bourque) for the psychic and New Age domain Heart & Soul Expo. The Heart & Soul Expo website solicits the following areas of expertise:
Heart & Soul Expo: Inspirational speakers plus: Acupressure, Angel therapy, Aura photography, Breath Work, Clairvoyance, Crystal Healing, Crystal Bowl Therapy, Diana Cooper School of Angel Healing, Energy Biofeedback Therapy, Environmental issues, Esoteric teachings, Feldenkreis therapy, Indian Head Massage Practitioner, Life Counsellor, Meditation, Oriental Dance Teachers, Pranic Healing, Psychic Medium, Reflexology, Reiki Practitioners / Masters, Shamanism, Tai Chi, Vedic Meditation Master, Yoga Teachers. Company products such as organic herbs, natural products, crystals, gemstones and gemstone jewellery, angels, fairies, Buddha’s. meditation CDs, incense and essential oils, meditation scarves and books. (Ref)

Although Robert Priddy continually attempts to con the general public into thinking he is entirely given to scientific reasoning, he is actually a true believer and a fierce defender, promoter, endorser, solicitor and friend to various self-professed psychics, trance mediums, reiki healers, guru wannabees, superstitionists, eccentric spiritualists, astrologers (including his own son, Kai Nicolai Priddy, who is heavily into astrology and is the webmaster for abacusastrology.co.uk) and other “lunatic fringe” Baba bashers.

ROUND ONE: Priddy vs Dawkins
Richard Dawkins wins with a knock-out punch to Robert Priddy’s pseudo-intellectual head. Robert Priddy’s adamant refusal to say one word against psychic medium Conny Larsson (although he trashed and bashed other psychics, mediums and channelers as “absurd charlatans”) thoroughly compromises his pseudo-skeptical rants.

Robert Priddy Hypocritically Cited Richard Dawkins
Robert Priddy (who can often be seen siding with and citing skeptics, atheists and rationalists against Sathya Sai Baba) wrote a hypocritical and deceitful article entitled “Sathya Sai Baba vs Richard Dawkins” and said (in part):


Robert Priddy: Richard Dawkins has some pertinent comments on how ‘personal religious experiences’ come about which the ‘blind believer’ should learn:-

“The human brain runs first-class simulation software. Our eyes don’t present to our brains a faithful photograph of what is out there, or an accurate movie of what is going on through time. Our brains construct a continuously updated model” and...

“Constructing models is something the human brain is very good at. When we are asleep it is called dreaming; when we are awake we call it imagination or, when it is exceptionally vivid, hallucination. As Chapter 10 will show, children who have ‘imaginary friends’ sometimes see them clearly, exactly as if they were real. If we are gullible, we don’t recognize hallucin­ation or lucid dreaming for what it is and we claim to have seen or heard a ghost; or an angel; or God; or – especially if we happen to be young, female and Catholic – the Virgin Mary. Such visions and manifestations are certainly not good grounds for believing that ghosts or angels, gods or virgins, are actually there.On the face of it mass visions, such as the report that seventy thousand pilgrims at Fatima in Portugal in 1917 saw the sun tear itself from the heavens and come crashing down upon the multitude, are harder to write off. It is not easy to explain how seventy thousand people could share the same hallucination. But it is even harder to accept that it really happened without the rest of the world, outside Fatima, seeing it too – and not just seeing it, but feeling it as the catastrophic destruction of the solar system, including acceleration forces sufficient to hurl everybody into space.” From ‘The God Delusion’ by Richard Dawkins, p. 115.



Richard Dawkins FRS, FRSL (born 26 March 1941) is a British ethologist, evolutionary biologist and popular science author. He was formerly Professor for Public Understanding of Science at Oxford and was a fellow of New College, Oxford. Dawkins is an atheist, secular humanist, sceptic, scientific rationalist, and supporter of the Brights movement. He has widely been referred to in the media as “Darwin’s Rottweiler”, by analogy with English biologist T. H. Huxley, who was known as “Darwin’s Bulldog” for his advocacy of Charles Darwin’s evolutionary ideas. In his 2006 book The God Delusion, Dawkins contends that a supernatural creator almost certainly does not exist and that faith qualifies as a delusion − as a fixed false belief. According to Dawkins, faith − belief that is not based on evidence − is one of the world’s great evils (Ref). Richard Dawkins is also a fierce critic of New Age alternative therapies, psychics, mediums, channelers, faith healers, angel therapists, aura photographers, astrologers, tarot card readers, homeopathists and water diviners.

The following excerpts were taken from an article published on the Times Online website entitled “Richard Dawkins And The New Age Fakers”:
This time, in The Enemies of Reason, he takes on the wider penumbra of the paranormal, New Age mystical mumbo-jumbo, and the often expensive spiritual services that bring succour to the sucker. His targets include astrologers, psychics, dowsers, homoeopaths and a woman called Elisis Livingstone who claims that in our Atlantean past we all had 12 strands of DNA rather than two...Much of the material may seem familiar to interested sceptics: the practice of cold-reading, whereby “psychics” pick up cues from their audience’s reactions to a scattering of vague words and phrases and use them to make people imagine they have been told something that relates specifically to them. Or the fact that homoeopathic remedies are claimed to work despite containing not a single molecule of the supposed active ingredient. The programmes feature a series of confrontations with assorted paranormal professionals who are asked to explain the basis behind their belief and whether it has ever been scientifically tested...So how many of these practitioners are crooks? “The psychics, I think, mostly are,” he says. “But with one spiritualist I couldn’t make out if he was a charlatan or not. It’s possible that they sort of know that they’re cold-reading, but they still think it’s the spirits channelling through them.” (Reference)

The following excerpts were taken from an article entitled “New Age Therapies Cause ‘Retreat From Reason’” and were originally published in the Sunday Telegraph UK on August 8th 2007:
Known as “Darwin’s rottweiler“, Prof Richard Dawkins caused a furore with a stinging attack on religion. Now the evolutionary biologist has turned his wrath on “new age” alternative therapies, describing them as based on “irrational superstition”. Prof Dawkins says that alternative remedies constitute little more than a “money-spinning, multi-million pound industry that impoverishes our culture and throws up new age gurus who exhort us to run away from reality.” The 66-year-old scientist has investigated a range of gurus and therapists, including faith healers, psychic mediums, angel therapists, “aura photographers”, astrologers, Tarot card readers and water diviners, and concluded that Britain is gripped by “an epidemic of superstitious thinking”....He laments the fact that half the population claims to believe in paranormal phenomena and more than eight million have consulted psychic mediums, while the number of students sitting physics A-level has fallen 50 per cent and chemistry by more than a third in the past 25 years....The professor reserves some of his most scathing criticism for homeopathy, used by 500 million people worldwide, and which, in the UK, benefits from taxpayers’ money even though it requires no qualifications.

Richard Dawkins has authored the following books:

  1. “The Greatest Show On Earth : The Evidence For Evolution” by Richard Dawkins (To be released in September 2009)

  2. “The Oxford Book of Modern Science Writing ” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Oxford University Press 2008

  3. “The God Delusion” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Houghton Mifflin 2006

  4. “The Selfish Gene” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Oxford University Press 2006

  5. “The Ancestor's Tale : A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Life” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Mariner Books 2005

  6. “A Devil’s Chaplain : Reflections on Hope, Lies, Science, and Love” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Mariner Books 2004

  7. “Unweaving the Rainbow : Science, Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Mariner Books 2000

  8. “The Extended Phenotype : The long reach of the gene” by Richard Dawkins; Published by Oxford University Press 1999

  9. “Climbing Mount Improbable ” by Richard Dawkins; Published by W.W. Norton & Company 1997

  10. “The Blind Watchmaker : Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design” by Richard Dawkins; Published by W.W. Norton 1996

  11. “River Out of Eden : A Darwinian View of Life” by Richard Dawkins; Published by HarperCollins Publishers 1996


Despite his hypocritical citations to Richard Dawkins, Robert Priddy openly promotes, endorses and/or professes friendship with:

  1. Trance Channeler & Self-Proclaimed Prophet Conny Larsson

  2. Guru Promoter, UFO Conspiracist & True Believer PhD Timothy Conway

  3. New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev

  4. Self-Proclaimed Spiritual Master ‘Ramana Baba’

  5. Ramtha Devotee Ullrich Zimmermann

  6. Fetishist & Hare Krsna Congregational Member Sanjay Dadlani

  7. Reiki Master And Spiritual Healer Yaman Konuralp


As a matter of fact, when Robert Priddy attempts to defend himself against Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist) he directs his readers to either:

  1. Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson’s website (located at saibabaexpose.com)

  2. Reincarnator, New Age Advocate and Grungy Integral Philosopher Alan Kazlev’s website (located at kheper.net)


How’s that for “scientific” or “rational”? Robert Priddy is obviously a very gullible and naive “true believer” who is willing to give credence to non-scientific beliefs by claiming that trance mediums, self-proclaimed prophets, aura readers, séance conductors, New Age advocates, guru adherents, self-proclaimed reincarnators, New Age believers and the like are intelligent, honest, credible and reliable individuals worthy of being referenced by him (a so-called “scholar” and “academic” not given to lunatic fringe or superstitious beliefs)! To Date: Robert Priddy adamantly refuses to say one word about his promotion and endorsement of these “lunatic fringe” (Priddy's favorite slur) individuals.

Apparently, Robert Priddy didn’t read Richard Dawkins “pertinent comments on how personal religious experiences come about which the blind believer should learn”. By citing Richard Dawkins against “blind believers”, Robert Priddy effectively invalidates the credibility, integrity and honesty of Conny Larsson (an alleged meditation guru, mantra acharya, trance medium, yoga instructor, pet psychic, Vedic Master, psychic healer & self-proclaimed prophet), Alan Kazlev (a grungy integral philosopher, reincarnator, New Age advocate and an alleged alien exiled to Earth to save the planet), Phd Timothy Conway (a true believer in New Age beliefs & practices, a solicitor of psychics and oracles, a UFO advocate and an author promoting numerous Gurus and Eastern philosophies), Sanjay Dadlani (a Hare Krishna congregational member who advocates for the literal and historical accuracy of the miracles described in Hindu scriptures), Tony O’Clery (a self-professed psychic, demon trance channeler and promoter of shape-shifters), Paul Eno (a self-professed psychic, intuitive, past life reader, Angel advocate and afterlife preparer), Kai Nicolai Priddy (Robert Priddy’s son who is heavily involved with astrology and is the webmaster for abacusastrology.co.uk), Ullrich Zimmermann (a Ramtha adherent who believes in a 36,000 year old entity as channeled through the alleged psychic medium JZ Knight), David J. Lyons (a member of IONS and a believer in Edgar Cayce), Julian O’Donnell (a self-professed psychic with alleged vast powers to combat the forces of evil), Kyra Kitts (a self-professed psychic and channeler), Dhyani Jo Sinclair (a New Age advocate and promoter of pyramid power), Alexandra Nagel (a believer in psychic medium Jane Roberts and psychic Wolf Messing), Barbara Dent (a fanatic Christian, a self-professed visionary, an alleged channeler of Mother Mary, a past life reviewer and astral traveler with the alleged power to make men impotent), Dilip Rajeev (a homeopathist, Bach flower therapy practitioner, fanatic promoter of the Falung Dafa cult and a creationist highly critical of science and the fossil record), Rin Meddo (a clearly schizophrenic and mentally unstable defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who claims possession), among numerous other “lunatic fringe” individuals belonging to the Anti-Baba movement (Ref).

ROUND TWO: Priddy vs Dawkins
Richard Dawkins wins with an incapacitating jab to Robert Priddy’s yellow-belly. Robert Priddy’s intimate association with various self-professed psychics and New Age adherents undermines his so-called scientific temper.

Robert Priddy And True Believer Helen Fields
On Trance Medium Conny Larsson’s psychic website (Heart & Soul Expo), Helen Fields (a reflexologist, reiki practitioner and Angel advocate) published various articles from Robert Priddy’s book “Beyond Science”, which is critical of the scientific method. As a matter of fact, Psychic Conny Larsson (under whose direct supervision the Heart & Expo website operates) apparently obtained Robert Priddy’s permission to publish his articles (as Priddy constantly whines about his “copyrights”) and apparently directed Helen Fields to publish Robert Priddy’s articles on his psychic domain because he is attempting to use Priddy’s articles as a prop, defense and alternative philosophical explanation for the purported claims made by psychics, mediums, trance channelers, angel/spirit guides, etc.!


Some priceless gems from pseudo-scientist and pseudo-rationalist Robert Priddy (one wonders what Richard Dawkins would think):
Robert Priddy: Having said all this, nonetheless, one must admit that there is no method by which the possibility of genuine divine revelation can be disproved, even though some sources can be largely discredited on sound research grounds. By carefully considering some of the content of many scriptures, one can well understand how the sublimity of conception and the resonance of ideas convince millions of their truth and their value as precepts, these convictions usually increasing with personal maturity. (“Revealed Truth”; Ref: Beyond Science (Without A Disclaimer As Of June 2009), by Robert Priddy)

Robert Priddy: We cannot perhaps be convinced that we are essentially nothing but truth, consciousness and bliss until, on some occasion at least, we experience it directly as such. The problem of truth is only fully resolved in Being. Meanwhile, faith of the kind rooted in experience inspires the understanding to move the spirit beyond the constraints of worldly attachments towards realisation. Through Vedanta we learn that only self-revealed truth, or of some aspect thereof, is universal. What is often called perennial or higher philosophy teaches that truth is to be found in the unsullied divinity shining through from deep within every being and each event. (“Transcendental Inexpressible Truth”; Ref: Beyond Science (Without A Disclaimer As Of June 2009), by Robert Priddy)

Robert Priddy: One also speaks of ‘intuitions’ that come ‘as a sixth sense’ and purport to reveal states of affairs that are hidden to normal perception. These cannot safely be ignored by truth-seekers, for some such intuitions have proven extremely accurate, as can be demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt from many of the countless recorded instances from all around the world throughout history. One cannot even discount all prophetic inspiration, nor any kind of ‘message’ from such supposed sources of information as trance and mediumism may contact, like disembodied minds or higher astral beings. (“Truth And Intuition”; Ref: Beyond Science (Without A Disclaimer As Of June 2009), by Robert Priddy)

On the Heart & Soul Expo domain, Helen Fields page states:
“Helen Fields is a Member of the Association of Reflexologists (MAR). She qualified as a Reflexologist in 1990 and have developed her skills alongside a career in nursing and health care education. Helen uses Reflexology as the starting point and then draws on her work with personal development coaching, NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming), Reiki, Angels and EFT (Emotional Freedom Therapy).” (Ref)

On the Vedic Master Class domain, Helen Fields is listed under “courses” and “teachers” (Refs: 01 - 02) and her profile states:


Helen Fields, England/Cyprus - Registered nurse and healthcare educator. Reflexologist since 1990. Works holistically as a therapist, using Reflexology as a starting point and then drawing from training in NLP, EFT, Reiki, Spiritual Response Therapy and angels. Helen enables clients to become the best of who they are, allowing their bodies to remember wellness. At the Masters Class she presented reflexology along with some techniques for self treatment.

Of course, the big questions are:

  1. Why is Helen Fields publishing Robert Priddy’s articles when he cited Richard Dawkins as a credible voice against superstition, New Age beliefs, reiki practitioners, gurus, true believers, blind believers, angel promoters and the “lunatic fringe” seen in cults, ashrams and new religious movements?

  2. Why hasn’t Robert Priddy said one word against psychic medium Conny Larsson although he cited Richard Dawkins as a credible voice against psychics, mediums and channelers?

  3. Why is Robert Priddy allowing Conny Larsson and Helen Fields to publish his anti-science rants on a psychic website when he is a fierce advocate for Richard Dawkins, Basava Premanand and other skeptics, atheists and rationalists who constantly belittle, ridicule and challenge people who claim paranormal abilities?

  4. Why is Robert Priddy allowing Conny Larsson to use his articles to justify and bolster the notion that psychics and New Age believers may be bona fide and have genuine spiritual experiences, intuitions and gifts?

  5. Why is Robert Priddy constantly citing psychic medium Conny Larsson as a credible voice against Sathya Sai Baba but purposely withholding any and all information about Conny Larsson’s psychic claims?

  6. If Robert Priddy truly believes that psychics, mediums and channelers are “absurd charlatans”, why did he give a public lecture alongside psychic medium Conny Larsson?


Psychic Medium Larsson With Pseudo-Scientist Priddy



ROUND THREE: Priddy vs Dawkins
Richard Dawkins wins as a discombobulated Robert Priddy knocks himself out. Robert Priddy’s anti-science rants and the publication of his articles on a psychic website to bolster the integrity of New Age advocates undermines his loud-mouthed references to skeptics, rationalists and atheists.

Robert Priddy Formerly Believed In Elementals, Elves And Fairies
In an article entitled “Belief and Manifestations” (which was first published in 1987 and left untouched until 2006) Robert Priddy professed belief in elementals, elves, fairies, mediums, leprechauns, UFOs and demons. After Joe Moreno found the article, Robert Priddy added a disclaimer giving a tongue-in-cheek denial about his former beliefs. Robert Priddy added the disclaimer because his former beliefs (like his use of LSD) clearly undermine his attempt to portray himself as a rationalist and intellectual.
BELIEF AND MANIFESTATIONS
The role of ‘elementals’ in visions and appearances by Robert Priddy

The existence of elementals that seek opportunities to take on any form that a living person’s mind or subconscious can provide for them could explain many otherwise incomprehensible ‘manifestations’, from ghosts and poltergeists to UFOs & extra-terrestrials and even the appearance of divine figures, the manifestation of deities (ishtadarshan) and religious personages. Some of these may be beneficial, some quite the opposite. Advaitic spirituality teaches that, ultimately, everything is a product of mind, which fits very well with this.

Among traditional forms of apparitions and visions in which many believed (and many still do) can sometimes be seen, conversed with and even touched by people are elves, fairies, leprechauns, gnomes, trolls, water spirits, animal and plant spirits or ‘devas’ , angels, invisible helpers', shaman ‘spirits’, ‘allies’ , UFOs, extra-terrestrials, possessive demons, Satan, Pan-figures and other demi-gods. Elementals may sometimes also assume the characteristics (voice, personality traits etc.), or even the physical form, of a departed person, as can allegedly be experienced in spiritualistic sessions.

I am well aware that most people who work in some scientific pursuit, or are involved with psychology and not least in psychiatry, will reject the views I air here, according to the supposed ‘scientific correctness’ of the times. Such professionals are very often too ensconced in their own beliefs to take notice that something is known of matters outside their ken, for they seldom set a foot beyond their mentally-furnished worlds into the uncomfortable realm of real uncertainties or self-risk.

I happen to have had a considerable number of experiences of otherwise inexplicable phenomena that fit with the thesis of elementals. Once, for example, when I was much attracted to nature mysticism, some wonderful synchronicities with creatures took place. (Ref)

ROUND FOUR: Priddy vs Dawkins
Richard Dawkins gives Robert Priddy whopping fat lips on both sides of the mouth he speaks out of. Robert Priddy’s flip-flopping from Anti-Science to Pro-Science, Pro-Superstition to Anti-Superstition, Pro-Psychics to Anti-Psychics back to Pro-Psychics, Pro-LSD to...well, Pro-LSD, etc., reveals his self-serving hypocrisy.

Robert Priddy Still Believes In Paranormal Powers
And to top it all off, Robert Priddy still believes (even to this day, after his defection) that Sathya Sai Baba possesses genuine paranormal powers.
Robert Priddy: “Nonetheless, it will surely surprise some that I am still almost certain - on the basis of extended personal observation - that Sathya Sai Baba can and does carry out apports, which therefore can appear as materialisations from nothing.”

Apports are said to be physical objects in existence that are dematerialized from one location and rematerialized to another.
Robert Priddy: “Some of what I experienced of SSB’s extraordinary and positive powers through many years is undeniable, even after the most rigorous skeptical investigations, and I do not regard him as any ordinary human being. I have simply had to realize that his actions in the worldly and human sphere are not infallible and are not always setting a perfect example for others.”

Robert Priddy believes that Sathya Sai Baba possesses genuine paranormal powers because the Guru cured him of a debilitating and chronic neck and spinal problem that no one else could cure and whose symptoms no doctor could alleviate. Robert Priddy claimed that Sathya Sai Baba cured him through a series of “dream-operations” that resulted in a literal and physical transformation of his spine, which was supported by x-rays and the testimony of Mr. Kylie (“an osteopath and master of various other disciplines”).

Robert Priddy also claimed that Sathya Sai Baba freed his mother from chronic pain and that a small speck of Sathya Sai Baba’s vibuthi instantaneously cured his paralyzed cat when it suffered from what appeared to be a stroke.

Trying to pass himself off as an intellectual who currently holds rationalistic and scientific beliefs, Robert Priddy miserably fails to explain away the enigma of Sathya Sai Baba. Instead, Robert Priddy appears very confused, conflicted and non-intelligent and ends up sticking his foot further into his mouth with his never-ending and very amusing equivocations. At least Richard Dawkins is consistent.

Robert Priddy vs Richard Dawkins: I think it is abundantly clear who the winner (i.e., Dawkins) is and who is the loser (i.e., Priddy).

These are the types of stooges and clowns who are attempting to “expose” Sathya Sai Baba. Next time you open your big mouth Mr. Priddles, make sure you don’t stick your big foot in it for the scientific world to see.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Swami Ambikananda Lambasted Robert Priddy

Swami Ambikananda Lambasted Robert Priddy

Swami Ambikananda
Before Robert Priddy became an overzealous enthusiast of the Indian Guru Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba, he was a devotee of Swami Ambikananda. About Ambikananda, Robert Priddy said:
Robert Priddy: “When I was connected in the 1970s with a pure Indian swami who lived in England (Swami Ambikananda), and to whom I had an intense relationship for some period, the same kind of synchronous phenomena occurred... and grew into a whole range of simultaneous thoughts-cum-events. It became very troublesome, for the more I concentrated on my connection to him, the more every other thought remotely I had about it seemed to produce a creak in the woodwork of the house or various ‘signs’ relating to him. During one period, the flame of a candle before his picture would ‘answer’ my definitive mental desire for an affirmation by directly sinking almost down to extinction for some time before burning up again.”

Robert Priddy also discussed Swami Ambikananda in his Pro-Baba book “Source Of The Dream - My Way To Sathya Sai Baba” (without mentioning him by name) and claimed that the Swami visited him in dreams, possessed supernatural and psychic powers, passed his predetermined mental tests, was responsible for his marriage to Reidun and that his eyes shone “like burning embers”. Robert Priddy also claimed that a clap of thunder echoed from a clear sky when he entertained the thought that Swami Ambikananda might be a womanizer!

It is significant to note that Swami Ambikananda told Robert Priddy that he should always remember Sai Baba or he “could go mad”. Although Robert Priddy wrote and spoke favorably about Swami Ambikananda, it is surprising that the Swami actually lambasted Robert Priddy as a “skeptic septic tank” (when he had no reason to do so) years before Robert Priddy became a foaming-at-the-mouth skeptic and years before Robert Priddy defected from the Sai Movement! As a matter of fact, Swami Ambikananda died in 1997, three years before Robert Priddy became a rabid ex-devotee.

By reading Robert Priddy’s current writing against Sathya Sai Baba and others, it certainly appears he has gone mad and most certainly is a “skeptic septic tank”. Apparently, there is more to Swami Ambikananda than meets the eye and his prophecy regarding Robert Priddy is wholly remarkable.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Copyright Blathering Backfires

Copyright Blathering Backfires

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic of Sathya Sai Baba and others) maliciously, publicly and widely published three different versions of Gerald Joe Moreno’s picture on WordPress and adamantly refused to remove them despite official requests from Wordpress to do so. As a matter of fact, Robert Priddy said:
Robert Priddy: I fully expected Moreno to complain against me in tit-for-tat fashion as usual, and he did! Mark of wordpress.com mailed (18 March 2009) to warn me that the person in the image I used several times had complained and asked for its removal! So far I have not complied.

As a result of Robert Priddy’s non-compliance, his Anti-Baba blog was delisted from WordPress results. Consequently, Robert Priddy was forced to remove Moreno’s copyright protected images, which he reluctantly did. Moreno’s three images were deleted by WordPress (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03) after Moreno was able to verify and fully substantiate that he is the copyright holder to the image in question (and thus to any derivative images made from it).

Although Robert Priddy and Kai Nicolai Priddy gnashed their teeth, foamed-at-their-mouths and raised huge wails about the following screencapped picture of them, they have been wholly unable to substantiate their claims to possessing the copyright to that screencapped picture (both Robert and Kai each claim copyrights to the picture in the screencap):


To Date: Let it go on record that:

  1. Moreno has never at any time been contacted by WordPress, Google, the DMCA (or anyone else for that matter) about the screencapped image of Robert Priddy & Kai Priddy.

  2. Moreno has never at any time been asked by WordPress, Google, the DMCA (or anyone else for that matter) to remove the screencapped image of Robert Priddy & Kai Priddy.


Therefore, it would appear that both Robert & Kai have been wholly unable to provide any verifiable or credible type of documentation that they are the copyright holders to the image in question.

Let this be a warning to other ex-devotees and critics who think they are free to publish Gerald Joe Moreno’s copyright protected picture in their publications. Since Gerald Joe Moreno is fully able and fully prepared to document that he is the copyright holder to the picture possessed by ex-devotees and critics, anyone caught publishing Moreno’s copyright protected picture in their publications without Moreno’s authorization are subject to legal prosecution for copyright infringement with hefty fines.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, May 03, 2009

Priddy's Htaccess Spin

Priddy's Htaccess Spin

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and thereby the Father who sent Jesus, Allah who sent Muhammad and the Creator of the Universe) wrote another fairy tale about Moreno on his Anti-Baba conspiracy blog.

This time around, Robert Priddy took issue with Moreno’s posts on his TimeLine Page (specifically the posts dated December 8th 2004 and December 10th 2004):
(Gerald Joe Moreno:) December 8th 2004: ExBaba.com, SaiGuru.net, SaiPetition.net and Robert Priddy banned my site from linking to their sites. They redirected the links, from their pages, to a hack-page that opened multiple windows and forced innocent users to shut down their computers!

(Gerald Joe Moreno:) December 10th 2004: ExBaba.com, in a frenzied attempt to maintain soviet-style control over their site, redirected all external links, from their site, to an index2 page that attacks me. This means that one cannot cut and paste the links into the address bar and view the page. The links must be accessed through their main frame. Consequently, you must look for the relevant link via category. ExBaba.com is running scared and trying to prevent the general public from validating my claims easily. This action forces the user to randomly browse their fluff site.

About these posts, Robert Priddy said:
Robert Priddy: COMMENT: No one was ever banned from linking to any of the named websites.There was no frenzy at ExBaba! Reinier van der Sandt decided to make use of frames. Moreno did not understand how to cut and paste links after the change. One simply had to right click on any page and go to “Properties” to copy the full URL. No other sites changed any parameters. There is no more control by the webmaster over the ExBaba site than Moreno’s exercises over his many websites and blogs. “Soviet-style” and “Running scared’ are laughably unreasonable claims.

Robert Priddy: COMMENT: Totally untrue all of it. None of us had any idea how to reject a particular person’s links to our websites or any way to force people to shut down their computers. An absurd false accusation. Moreno had troubles with his own computer, most likely, and - as with so many other things - chose to blame it on the exposé. This served Moreno’s intention NEVER to link to any exposé web pages, which he has never done since then. He was worried that people would then see the falsity of his highly selective materials, out-of-context references and how hugely he ’spins’ everything. Naturally, most exposé sites do not link to him, for why would any wish to link to pages full of libel, distortion, misinformation, slurs and mud-slinging?

Far be it for an internet newbie like Robert Priddy (who even attributed an IP belonging to HIS own computer to Moreno and who published several embarrassing internet blunders such as the Laughable SheilaWaring Lie) to be making erroneous assumptions about Web-Designer Moreno’s proficiency in finding URLs on framed websites! This issue was/is not about finding URLs whatsoever.

Malicious Redirection Ploys Confirmed:
It is a fact that Ex-Devotees blocked Moreno’s website through htaccess and redirected all links from Moreno’s domain to a hack page that forced innocent users to shut down their computers. Moreno viewed this malicious htaccess hack for himself first-hand and received several complaints from others as well. The htaccess hack did not occur solely only on Moreno’s computer as falsely assumed by Robert Priddy.

Even when Reinier van der Sandt created his 77 attack pages against Moreno, Reinier never once denied the htaccess ploy. Only after a couple of years of absolute silence did Ex-Devotees finally come forward claiming that Moreno lied about the htaccess event.

However, there is circumstantial evidence that strongly supports Moreno’s claim about the htaccess ploy. Just two days after Moreno deactivated all direct links to Anti-Baba domains (meaning that the htaccess ploy would no longer work), Reinier van der Sandt (the webmaster for the Ex-Baba Domain) resorted to another htaccess redirection ploy that was screencaptured by Moreno and documented on his TimeLine Page (dated December 10th 2004).

The ExBaba domain was a framed website and if one accessed the ExBaba Domain through their main index page, all of their webpages loaded into frames. However, if one accessed the ExBaba Domain through internet searches, the webpages loaded as single webpages (not in frames).

On December 10th 2004 (after Moreno deactivated direct linking to Anti-Baba websites) Reinier van der Sandt redirected all non-framed webpages to an “index2.html” file by using another htaccess redirection ploy. Therefore, it is a fact that at the time Moreno accused Ex-Devotees of using a malicious htaccess redirection ploy, they were experimenting with other htaccess redirection ploys to prevent direct linking to the ExBaba domain.

The common code used for this type of htaccess redirection ploy is:
Redirect /index.html http://www.site.com/index2.html

Needless to say, the “index2.html” htaccess redirection ploy prevented internet users from accessing the Anti-Baba information they sought because it forced them (via redirection) into the framed “index2.html” webpage. Once Reinier van der Sandt realized the ramifications of his not-so-clever redirection ploy, he removed it in February 2005, but not before Moreno screencaptured it (Ref). See for yourself:




After Reinier van der Sandt removed the “index2.html” htaccess redirection ploy, he then added a frame forwarding script to the webpages that reloaded them into the framed version. Many months later, this script was removed as well. To prevent easier verification of Moreno’s claims, Reinier van der Sandt blocked access to archive.org. See For Yourself.

It goes without mention that although Moreno deactivated direct linking to Anti-Baba websites, he still provided the full URLs to relevant webpages, which readers were free to cut and paste if they so chose.

Therefore, Moreno’s claims that Ex-Devotees were using htaccess redirection ploys are based on facts, not speculations, assumptions or conspiracies.

  1. For a couple of years Ex-Devotees never once denied Moreno’s “htaccess ploy” accusation against them.

  2. Reinier van der Sandt was experimenting with htaccess redirection ploys a couple of days after Moreno accused him of using a malicious htaccess redirection ploy that forced users to turn off their computers.

  3. Reinier van der Sandt blocked archive.org so that his subterfuge and deceit could not be easily verified by the general public.


Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotee’s internet behavior reeks of deceit and dishonesty and their non-referenced, unsubstantiated and unsupported speculations bear no resemblance to Moreno’s open, direct and fully referenced replies.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Second Coming Ignorance

Second Coming Ignorance

Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and thereby the Father who sent Jesus, Allah who sent Muhammad and the Creator of the Universe) wrote an amusing response to Moreno’s article about him entitled Is Robert Priddy A Fundamentalist Christian?

Robert Priddy responded (in part):
Robert Priddy: Firstly, Joe Moreno (as vishvarupa108) made wide accusations of clinging to a Christian fundamentalist belief against the group he calls “anti-Sais” which is shown in the following posting which turned up in an archived e-mail attachment I received. There he claimed we all cling to a “second coming” mentality because we have nothing else to cling to. Wholly preposterous, of course, and indicative of Christian fundamentalism - for belief in the Second Coming is hardly no longer a belief promoted by mainstream Christianity (as opposed to fundamentalists). Moreno’s co-worker Lisa de Witt (who he never criticises or corrects despite her outrageous statements) has definitively included and named me as Christian and fundamentalist (which she may try to deny). Therefore Moreno is obviously aligned with her by his recent stated support for her claims.

First and foremost, Moreno has never supported the alleged claim that Lisa De Witt said that Robert Priddy is a Christian. Lisa de Witt denies making such a claim and although Robert Priddy expected Lisa de Witt to deny the claim, he provided no references to support his comments about her. Therefore, this particular argument by Robert Priddy is totally deflated. Secondly, let us look at Moreno’s actual comments (with references) in proper context regarding his usage of the term “second coming”:
Joe Moreno: Yes, Dave, you can still cling to your “second coming” mentality regarding the “truth” that will come out regarding the murders. (Reference)

Joe Moreno: Anti-SSB Activists are clinging to their “second coming” mentality and are relying on unsubstantiated propaganda until the evidence they hope exists, surfaces. (Reference)

Joe Moreno: Robert Priddy clings to his second coming mentality, hoping that his conspiracy theory will one day be vindicated. Eleven years and counting and Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba has never been implicated (in any way, shape or form) with the police shootings that occurred on June 6th 1993. (Reference)

As one can clearly see, the context Moreno used for the term “second coming mentality” was non-religious in nature and was not indicative (directly, indirectly or otherwise) that Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees were Christians awaiting the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

As rational and intelligent readers are aware, the term “Second Coming” (besides referring to Christ’s return) is also a semantical term commonly used by prestigious media (including Forbes, Discover magazine, international newspapers, books, movies, TV stations, etc.) that does not refer to the Christian concept of parousia (also known as the “Second Advent”). Rather, the term “second coming” can be used to denote the occurrence, hope or expectation of an actualization, reappearance or re-invention of a person, thing or event.

Second Coming Nike
Common Non-Christian Usage For The Term “Second Coming” In International Media (A Small Selection):

  1. The Second Coming of Biofuels

  2. Brian O’Leary The Second Coming Of Science

  3. The iPhone’s Second Coming

  4. Tim Geithner, CNBC, and the Second Coming of Known Unknowns

  5. Clough’s Second Coming

  6. Why Keegan’s Second Coming at Newcastle may be doomed to failure

  7. Al-Qaeda: The Second Coming

  8. Second Empire to expand in ‘second coming’

  9. The Second Coming Of Richard Li

  10. The Second Coming Of Christos Cotsakos

  11. No Quick Second Coming for Dead Zimdollar

  12. The Second Coming of Newt Gingrich

  13. Tony Blair’s second coming

  14. HOMEOPATHY: THE SECOND COMING

  15. Medvedev as the Second Coming of Gorbachev

  16. The Second Coming Of Identity Politics

  17. Imperfect Charisma: The Second Coming of Benazir Bhutto


Therefore, Moreno’s usage of the term “second coming mentality” proves he did not imply or insinuate (in the least) that Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees were Christians awaiting the Second Advent of Jesus Christ.

Second Coming Non Religious
Robert Priddy Denies Christian Anti-Baba Movements:
Robert Priddy (under the pseudonym “Participant Observer”) said:
Robert Priddy (Pseudonym “Participant Observer”): No, bazza1, I am not a Christian or a follower of any other organised religion. This is typical of Sai people... to think that vested church interests are behind the allegations etc. because Sai Org. chief Indulal Shah made this specious claim in directives against his better knowledge. I know of no Church involvments, and I know the exposé scene better than most. (Reference)

That’s right, Robert Priddy claimed that he knew of no Church involvements against Sathya Sai Baba despite the fact that his co-conspirator and co-writer Barry Pittard openly boasted about polarizing Christians against Sathya Sai Baba. Reinier van der Sandt (the webmaster to the largest Anti-Baba websites on the internet and a known associate of Robert Priddy) posted Christian banners on his Ex-Baba domain (Ref) and wrote a couple of letters to Cardinal Simonis attempting to polarize Christians against Sathya Sai Baba. Read The Full Article About Christian Anti-Hindu and Anti-Baba Movements Here.

So when Robert Priddy attempted to argue that Moreno “hypoctitically tries through vehement denial to appear to distance himself from the business of smearing ‘Anti-Sais’ as Christians and/or fundamentalists among whom he definitively includes me”, he is out of touch with reality.

The extreme way in which Robert Priddy pigeonholes Moreno’s words gives one the distinct impression that Robert Priddy is unmovable by truth or reason and his moral cowardice is masked in bold rhetoric.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Screencap Fraud Against Gerald Joe Moreno

Screencap Fraud Against Gerald Joe Moreno

Anti-Sai Activists Caught In A Deliberate Act Of Screencap Fraud
Although Moreno has been saying for years that Anti-Sai Activists are frauds, cheats and liars, there is now conclusive proof that Ex-Devotees are openly resorting to fraudulence by publishing faked “screencaps” of webpages they alleged were taken from Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain.

On Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson’s Anti-Sai website, he published an obviously faked ‘screencap’ of Moreno’s About Me webpage (Moreno’s picture has been covered and the thumbnail pic can be enlarged by clicking on it):


Obvious Discrepancies On The Bogus Screencap:

  1. Notice the complete difference in width.

  2. The picture is offset.

  3. The text is offset.

  4. The spacing between the text “~About Me~” and the picture is incorrect.

  5. The spacing between the picture and the text is incorrect.

  6. The bogus screen-cap states “New Mexico ~” when it should read “New Mexico, USA~” (the word “USA” is completely missing).

  7. The line that reads “I’m captivated by India” should be on one line. On the bogus screen-cap, it isn’t.

  8. The text on the original page is tightly snuggled between two side-bars. Notice the vertical, pink line on the bogus screencap (showing a gap where the other sidebar was obviously added). This vertical line is nowhere to be found on Moreno’s geocities website.

  9. Notice that the spacing between the sidebars is significantly wider than it is on Moreno’s geocities website. For instance, the sentence “For the past 14 years I have traveled many times to India” fills the entire space between the sidebars. On the bogus screencap, there is additional spacing on both sides of that sentence although the extra word “I’m” was added (note that the font size has been set in the html).

  10. The line that reads “I’m rational, logical and down to earth. Yes, seriously. I’m Caucasian/Italian/Mexican Blend and 34 years young” is the very last and concluding statement on the page. It is not (and never has been) located in the introductory comments, conclusively proving the screencap was faked.


About the bogus screencap, Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson said:
Conny Larsson: (screen captures are from a secondary source on the web which reproduced parts of his vishvarupa.com pages)

Needless to say, Moreno’s geocities webpages were never “reproduced” on his vishvarupa.com domain. Therefore, the claim of a “secondary source” is a bold-faced and gutter lie. Why would critics need to rely on “secondary sources” when Moreno’s geocities webpages are still on the internet? The “secondary sources” admission from critics proves they did not obtain the screencap legitimately or directly from Moreno’s geocities website.

Of course, this is not the first time that Ex-Devotees have published fraudulent information against Moreno. See:

  1. QuickTopic Posts And The ‘saibabaexpose’ Lie

  2. Cloaked Or Anonymous IP Lies

  3. “Fighting The Smears” Articles: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07 - 08 - 09 - 10


Robert Priddy’s Publication Of A Fraudulent Screencap
Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) published a screencap on his defamatory Anti-Baba blog that he alleged was taken from Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain. In truth, the screencap most certainly did not come from Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain! Even the title on Priddy’s bogus screencap is messed up (whereas the title on Moreno’s webpage has never been messed up).

Moreno still has all his backups from his vishvarupa.com domain going back to 2004 and none of those backups contain the fake URL listed on Priddy’s bogus screencap. As a matter of fact, all of Moreno’s articles (beside pictures) were published under the folder “Fair-Is-Fair” and the links page with relevant redirects can be found here (which has been online since mid-2005 when Moreno moved his Sai Controversy webpages to his newer saisathyasai.com domain).

Robert Priddy’s Bogus Screencap:


The geocities webpages in question were made using geocities webpage-maker. Therefore, all of the pictures and text in Moreno’s articles are set to exact specifications that cannot be easily duplicated on other websites. It certainly appears that someone copied Moreno’s image files and attempted to mess with the html with obvious and messy results!

Important points to ponder:

  1. Why would Moreno lie about not duplicating his geocities webpages on his vishvarupa.com domain?

  2. What would Moreno have to lose considering that the webpages in question are still available on the internet on geocities?

  3. Critics have not (so far) alleged that there are any discrepancies between their copies of Moreno’s webpages and the ones currently online. So what exactly are critics whining about?


How Robert Priddy’s Screencap Was Most Likely Falsified:
A simple way to falsify the screencap is to simply replace the web address with a different one. A simple tactic that anyone can do in a matter of seconds. For example, look at the following screencap. By observing it, one would think that the Albert Einstein template was published on Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain. It wasn’t. The web address was simply changed and the screencap taken.


These are the types of shameless liars, deceivers and counterfeiters who are attempting to portray themselves as credible and moral voices against Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba!

Critics should come forward with full screencaps to all of Moreno’s alleged webpages and make them publicly available for public scrutiny. After all, what do they have to fear? One is left to wonder why critics are publishing bits and pieces of Moreno’s webpages (many years after the fact) that reveal altered and manipulated text, font and urls.

Even though Moreno’s vishvarupa.com and geocities websites are archived on archive.org, Robert Priddy (being the conspiracist that he is) attempted to argue that Moreno was somehow able to manipulate and deceive archive.org about which content they archived!

Of course, Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate (who publicly solicited a Pro-Drug Forum intended for drug users). Robert Priddy is also a fierce defender, promoter and associate of Conny Larsson, an ex-devotee turned self-professed Prophet and Psychic Trance Medium! And to top it all off, Robert Priddy fabricated sexual molestation claims against Moreno.

  1. If Robert Priddy has the temerity to falsify sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other stories of sexual molestation is he falsifying as well?

  2. If Robert Priddy shamelessly falsified sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what is to stop him from falsifying other information against Moreno as well?

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, April 27, 2009

Sai Devotee Anywhere Between 17-26 Years

Sai Devotee Anywhere Between 17-26 Years

Robert Priddy ceaselessly contradicts himself about how long he was a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba and when he defected from the Sai Movement. One thing is certain: Robert Priddy and Reidun Priddy became Sai Devotees in 1983. Robert & Reidun claimed they left Sathya Sai Baba in April of 2000. Therefore, Robert Priddy was a Sai Devotee for 17 years. Needless to say, Robert Priddy has blatantly exaggerated (i.e., “lied”) and purposely embellished the number of years he was an alleged Sai Devotee. Look at the following screencap that proves this point (click on picture to enlarge):


Although both Robert and Reidun Priddy were devotees of Sathya Sai Baba for 17 years, Robert Priddy progressively changed the number of years from “about 18 years” to “18 years” to “20 years” to “26 years”! Robert Priddy was also writing Anti-Sai Articles as early as March 2001.

As Moreno has said many times before, Robert Priddy is a known exaggerator, liar and deceiver with proof. All of the screencaps above were obtained solely through Anti-Sai Websites. But most of them came directly from Robert Priddy’s Anti-Sai Websites. Needless to say, Robert Priddy will continue to whine, snivel and lie that all the claims Moreno makes against him are not supported with facts, etc. (as he has spammed on his Anti-Baba blog and elsewhere on the internet).

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, April 24, 2009

Legal Threat Sent Robert Priddy Packing

Legal Threat Sent Robert Priddy Packing

Dr. Leo Rebello, N.D., Ph.D., D.Sc., F.F.Hom, MBA, is the Director of Natural Health Centre, Bombay. He has delivered over 10,000 lectures in 63 countries (including WHO, UNAIDS, UNESCO, UNDP, UNEP, UN-HABITAT conferences), has written 30 books and has been interviewed by the world media.

Due to Leo Rebello’s critical (albeit private) emails about Mary Garden’s book “The Serpent Rising”, Ex-Devotees herded together (as they typically do) and spammed Leo Rebello with numerous hate emails.

Leo Rebello responded likewise and wrote what definitely appeared to be highly confrontive and defamatory responses. However, Leo Rebello wrote his replies privately, without attempting to give them publicity on the internet. Needless to say, Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) decided to publicly smear Leo Rebello and published selective and private emails allegedly sent to him by Leo Rebello. Robert Priddy purposely misspelled various email addresses (so they could not be identified) and purposely misspelled his own name as “Rob*rt Pr*ddy” so as to “avoid undue web publicity from search engines for myself”. Noticeably absent were many of the emails that prompted Leo Rebello’s responses in the first place.

Going for the jugular, Robert Priddy publicly published Leo Rebello’s alleged emails with Mary Garden and others on the following three websites:

  • home.chello.no/~reirob/Rebello.htm

  • angeltowns.com/members/tanik/

  • metasci.tripod.com/hom.htm


Leo Rebello responded by threatening Robert Priddy with a million dollar legal suit for defamation and:

  1. Publicly accused Robert Priddy of being a homosexual.

  2. Publicly accused Robert Priddy of being sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba.

  3. Publicly accused Robert Priddy of having a gay lover named “Ronald Pallas”.

  4. Publicly alleged that Robert Priddy was suffering from AIDS.

  5. Publicly alleged that Robert Priddy used bogus email IDs.

  6. Publicly alleged that he filed a legal suit against AngelTowns and sent copies to the Mumbai Police, Interpol, Euro police and Swedish police.


In emails no longer online, Rebello alleged:

  1. Robert Priddy was suffering from “schizophrenia”.

  2. Robert Priddy was a “nitwit”.

  3. Everyone at ExBaba.com were “homosexuals”, “drug addicts“ or “vagabonds“.

  4. Robert Priddy wrote a lot of “shit”.

  5. Robert Priddy wrote a lot of “spam”.

  6. Robert Priddy was a “buffoon” and compared the ExBaba admin to “deranged gang members”.

  7. Robert Priddy was a “nut case”, “sick man” and a “mentally deranged person”.


By reading Rebello’s opinions about Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees, one could definitely say that Rebello’s opinions were defamatory and libelous. HOWEVER, what was Robert Priddy’s response to Leo Rebello’s million dollar legal threat?

First, Robert Priddy egotistically challenged Leo Rebello and said:
Robert Priddy: So it is with confidence that I would face Rebello in the Norwegian courts, where whatever reputation he may have will really be destroyed in a sound public fashion (note: I am not under any Indian jurisdiction, of course). In any case, my counter-damages would be considerable, of course, and he will have to face all the costs too. The only problem is, in the most unlikely even of him appearing in this country which I know so well, it would be utterly boring and distasteful to have to do with such an unbalanced person as one can see he is from his ravings and (judging by his fixation on gutter sex language) such an apparently sexually-disturbed individual.

Then what did Robert Priddy do? Robert Priddy immediately and promptly deleted all of his public webpages against Leo Rebello although it appeared that Leo Rebello was the one guilty of defamation. WHY did Robert Priddy (who often makes legal threats against others) cave in so quickly to Leo Rebello’s legal threat? Could it be there was some truth to Leo Rebello’s claims about Robert Priddy?

I suspect there was.

I also suspect that Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees sent Leo Rebello highly defamatory emails as well (which would explain their absence on Robert Priddy’s former Anti-Rebello websites).

As a matter of fact, the following email (sent at 2:42 A.M.) from Robert Priddy (which he publicly released and self-disclosed on AngelTowns for years as public domain) provides revealing insights as to what provoked Leo Rebello to write what he did:


Robert Priddy: Dr. Leo Rebello, Having found out some of what you wrote to Mary Garden as according to the new posting on the web (www.exbaba.com), I recognise that you are clearly a King among that broad class of people who are “ignorant and arrogant”. Probably you have imbibed too much of your own urine and other products. I know the whole story of the contorted ayurveda which is now largely ancient superstition from a time when people died not even knowing the actual causes... and you have the temerity to proffer yourself as a candidate for the Swedish Nobel Prize in medicine! Some hopes you do have! One has to chuckle at your supreme witlessness.

You are just a self-promoting parasite on well-known people (Weve seen the promo photos and your sheepish pride such as with the famous like Deepak Chopra, another expensive cheapjack). Who do you think you are to talk about abortion as murder, when you have murdered your own intelligence with your overweening ego and grasping nature... and indirectly share the heavy responsiblity with your absurd brain-washed AIDS propaganda for the awful sufferings and unnecessary deaths of countless AIDS victims. You in your ridiculous rainbow-coloured coat... not a Jacob but a patronising skunk whose words show your lack of normal human decency, absence of compassion and moral stupidity. Besides, the Brahma principle, as you would probably call it, does not enter the human foetus until around 14 weeks, and you don't even know that!

Never fear, the advance of medicine will sweep away all the detritus of your perverted kind of ‘spirituality’ in the course of time as the race evolves. You most probably believe in hell... so may you be happy in it! With righteous scorn for an all-round indecent priggish and wholly unconvincing ‘man’. And you are being monitored carefully by people you are not aware of. Take good care, instead of mouthing off...

Robert Priddy also published the following disgusting picture of Rebello on his angeltowns account:


This is the way pseudo-moralist Robert Priddy typically attacks his detractors.

According to Leo Rebello, he was sent harassing emails from:

  1. korola@start.no (Ronald Pallas, who happened to have the exact same IP as Robert Priddy, raising the suspicion that the name “Ronald Pallas” may be a pseudonym.)

  2. r.v.d.sandt@hetnet.nl (Rienier Van Der Sandt)

  3. ex-baba@hetnet.nl (Reinier Van Der Sandt)

  4. dark_knight_9@yahoo.com (Sanjay Dadlani)

  5. ompukalani@hotmail.com (Brian Steel)

  6. RaviChandra@everyday.com (Ravi Chandra - Unknown and raising the suspicion that the name “Ravi Chandra” may be a pseudonym.)

  7. marygarden@bigpond.com (Mary Garden)

  8. glenmeloy@earthlink.net (Glen Meloy)

  9. yesontruth@earthlink.net (Glen Meloy)

  10. conny@email.com (Conny Larsson)
  11. norbert@chello.no (Norbert K Hinna - Unknown)
  12. bpittard@beachaccess.com.au (Barry Pittard)
  13. rover@jcputty.com (Unknown and a suspected pseudonymous account)

  14. allenbro@chello.no (Unknown and a suspected pseudonymous account)

  15. robrei@start.no (Robert & Reidun Priddy)

  16. rpriddy@online.no (Robert Priddy)

  17. rero@chello.no (Robert Priddy)

  18. satyavijaya@myrealbox.com (Robert Priddy)

  19. anir@start.no (Robert Priddy and/or Randi Godager - “anir” was the name of the root folder to one of Robert Priddy’s Anti-Baba websites and it is unknown why “Randi Godager” would use an email address that resolved specifically to Robert Priddy’s Anti-Baba domain, raising the suspicion that the name “Randi Godager” may be a pseudonym.)


One can’t help to wonder why Ex-Devotees spammed Leo Rebello numerous times under various email addresses. It certainly appears that Ex-Devotees attempted to portray themselves as different people (under various email accounts) and were caught in the act by Rebello.

Leo Rebello’s Original Comments About His Legal Threat Against Robert Priddy On Indymedia (Since Deleted By Indymedia Because Of Priddy’s Defamatory Comments And Due To A Legal Threat Against Them As Well):
india.indymedia.org/en/2004/01/208787.shtml
REJOINDER TO ROBERT PRIDDY's MALICIOUS COMMENTS
Dr. Leo Rebello 29/10/2004 08:39
leorebello@vsnl.com
http://www.aidsalternativa.org

ROBERT PRIDDY (rpriddy@online.no; robrei@start.no)
AND ANGEL TOWN (http://www.angeltowns.com)
SUED FOR MISCHIEF ON THE NET
For more details contact Dr. Leo Rebello
Email : leorebello@vsnl.com
Website : www.aidsalternativa.org

The topic above is World Parliament and look at what this moron called Robert Priddy is writing. The so-called defamatory emails that he is referring to were all in response to his spamming and mudslinging. I do NOT know this bum personally. Robert Priddy claims that he is a British scholar, who earlier retired from Swedish university and now residing in Oslo, Norway. This 70+ nitwit sometimes writes that he retired as Lecturer and sometimes as Professor of Sociology and Philosophy. Earlier he taught Botany!!! He also worked for Satya Sai Baba and was obviously used by Baba. Hence, he and his insane colleagues have started a website called www.exbaba.com in which they say that Baba screwed many of them at Putthaparthy. If their charge that Baba is a Homosexual is true, then Baba obviously knows who are Homosexuals!!! Robert Priddy is one of them.

This Robert Priddy and his other colleagues on www.exbaba.com all of a sudden started spamming me in mid-December 2003 and continued till January 2004, till I served a legal notice on them and complained to various authorities.

Briefly the case is: One Mary Garden, the writer of The Serpent Rising, resident of Australia sent me her said book duly autographed, for REVIEW in Indian media. I do not know her personally. Infact, it is her publisher who first got in touch with me by scanning Indian authors and publishers directory.

On reading the said book I found it very disgusting and I wrote to her and the publisher that I would not be reviewing it. Thereafter, the whore unleashed madmen like Robert Priddy on me and they would spam me daily hitting below the belt and I too in turn give them good. During one month, I carpet bombed them with about 40 replies, including a notice to Mary Garden. She kept quiet, but this crook called Robert Priddy continued because no one had challenged him before about his dirty habits.

Homosexuals, as you would know always attack from behind. Since they could not fight with me, this Robert Priddy and "her" husband Ronald Pallas put some webpages on http://www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/ since it offers free hosting. Robert Priddy is suffering from AIDS, "because AIDS is predominantly a disease limited to Homosexuals" Dr. Gordon Stewart, Emeritus Professor of Public Health, Universityof Glasgow, UK (for more details read my book AIDS and Alternative Medicine soon going into 4th edition due to popular demand).

I came to know of this piddling Priddy's mischief about three days ago and served a legal notice on AngelTowns.com, with copies to Mumbai Police, Interpol, Euro police, Swedish police, etc. Immediately the said defamatory matter was removed and the AngelTowns.com confirmed that offending ininformation was listed for the user called Ronald Pallas IP: 80.111.17.23 email: korola@start.no

I did further search to find out whether the mischief of these Homosexual idiots had spread and found that even on responsible Indymedia this man had planted the above libelous comment. This therefore is my candid reply.

Now let us come to Mary Garden's book The Serpent Rising, with which this nuisance started. Mary Garden of Australia has documented some of her forays into sex, drugs, and vagrancy in that book. Here are some nuggets: Sai Baba, she says, is a hermaphrodite & homosexual - page 44 and talks of surrendering to him - page 16. Then she runs away from him because he played footsie with her but did not call her to his bedroom. She is therefore disappointed and runs away to Rishikesh in the Himalayas. There she gets pregnant from Balyogi - page 203. She then aborts a 4-month fetus (a boy according to the nurse who puts the fetus in the dustbin) in a Delhi Nursing Home and feels it was a murder - page 211. Next she has encounters with Rajneesh in his dark chambers in Pune, etc. etc. The cover page shows Rajneesh working on her. Prior to meeting all these "unholy men" like Satya Sai Baba, Balyogi Premvarni and Rajneesh (her words), Mary enjoyed drugs & sex with older men in Auckland, by the time she was 16 - page 5. Infact her sexual experiments started at a very young age when the neighbour took her and her sister in a hen house and made them do felatio. And such a pornographic book she has dedicated to her two children. The details about her husband are missing.

I received the said book on 2nd December, 2003. After reading it I wrote to her that I was disappointed with her book and I will NOT be reviewing the same since it was semi-pornographic. So, she got wild and pressed into service Robert Priddy ( rpriddy@online.no; robrei@start.no;); Ravi Chandra ( RaviChandra@everyday.com); and these other persons with emails like satyavijaya@myrealbox.com; r.v.d.sandt@hetnet.nl; dark_knight_9@yahoo.com; anir@start.no; ompukalani@hotmail.com; rover@jcputty.com; ex_baba@hetnet.nl; rero@chello.no (I do NOT know any one of them), and they started spamming me till I sent them the following warning :-

----- Original Message ----- From: DR. LEO REBELLO To: rpriddy@online.no ; robrei@start.no
Cc: abuse@vsnl.com ; customerservice@vsnl.co.in
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:09 PM
Subject: Robert Priddy -- your spam returned

ROBERT PRIDDY Thrice you have said that you have my telephone number. So, what can you do? You also have my complete postal address. So, what can you do? I do not operate from behind post box addresses or bogus email IDs like you. You have also seen my photographs with the Prime Ministers, Presidents and other dignitaries on my website: www.aidsalternativa.org So, what can you do? This is your final warning, Robert Priddy. Piss off. Or you will spend the rest of your life in the Indian jails.
Best wishes for your sanity
Dr. Leo Rebello

So, this explains the full story.

Now, what I wish to know from Indymedia is whether they periodically check the violations on the Net or not. This Robert Priddy's libelous comment on me has been displayed on Indymedia since February 2004. In these months, it must have done immense harm to my reputation. Now, I want it to continue along with this my candid reply till the matter is solved.

Eventhough Angel Town has immediately removed the offending page http://www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/ that Priddy refers to; I have served a one million-dollar damages claim on them. If Indymedia were to remove this comment and not apologise to me, and/or post other such mischievous comments from some bogus, I will make Indymedia also a party in the defamation case. Other mischief-makers should also take note.

MISCHIEF ON THE NET

Mischief on and by Indymedia
Dr. Leo Rebello 15/11/2004 06:23
leorebello@hotmail.com

One Robert Priddy has put a mischievous comment as under:

Dr. Leo Rebello
Not applicable 15/02/2004 12:36
rpriddy@online.no

http://www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/

Against this, I posted a counter comment on 29th October, 2004, at about 2.00 PM. You were also notified on Saturday, October 30, 2004 1:16 PM vide an email. Till today, my counter has not appeared nor have you replied to this deliberate mischief. So, there seems to be a clear violation of netiquettes and I may be constrained to send you a defamation notice and/or institute criminal proceedings against Indymedia if this mischief continues. So, please post my reply to Robert Priddy, immediately. Thanks.

Robert Priddy loves to reference his libels to other people on the internet. Even referencing his sexual abuse libels against Moreno to Basava Premanand (who libeled Moreno the same way).

Consequently, if one were to use the exact same standards against Robert Priddy (that he used/uses against Moreno), he would be implicated in a rats nest of allegations that include homosexuality (let us not forget his son’s use of dildos and transvestites as theatrics in his music band and Priddy’s homoerotic dreams), AIDS, drugs, fake names, etc., all supported by a legal threat that sent Robert Priddy packing with his tail between his legs!

Tsk.

Labels: , , , , ,

Monday, April 20, 2009

Robert Priddy - Blogged Articles To Date

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

BLOG INDEX OF ARTICLES ABOUT ROBERT PRIDDY SO FAR:

Robert Priddy's Drug Years:
- Robert Priddy’s “A Vision Of Cosmic Energy” (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy’s “Truth, Being And Bliss” (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy’s “The Psychedelic Experience” (or Archive)

- Robert Priddy Cites Pro-Drug Forum For Drug Users
- Robert Priddy's Drug Years - An Overview (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy Removing Biographical Data
- Robert Priddy's Copyright Blathering

Fighting The Smears
- The Laughable Sheila Waring Lie
- Does Robert Priddy Have AIDS?
- Dirty Old Man Robert Priddy
- Fundamentalist Christian Label
- Robert Priddy's Lies Spiral Out Of Control
- Defense Of The Sai Organization
- Public Pictures And Swami Premananda
- Sai Petition And SaiSathyaSai Server
- Pervert Priddy Fantasizes Molestation

Miscellaneous Articles About Robert C. Priddy
- Robert Priddy - A Time Line
- Priddy's Primary Webpage Indexed On Porn Sites (or Archive)
- Is Robert Priddy Well Funded?
- Robert Priddy's Pro/Anti Sai Baba Books (or Archive)
- Priddy's Disreputable Air-Signaller Training (or Archive)
- Source Of The Homoerotic Dreams?
- Robert Priddy's Moon Madness
- Robert Priddy And The saibaba.org.uk Domain
- Robert Priddy's Man In The Moon
- To Be Or Not To Be Anonymous
- Robert Priddy - The Hinduism Basher
- Robert Priddy's "Transvestite" Guru
- Robert Priddy's Perverted Friends
- NitwitNastik And Robert Priddy
- Robert Priddy - A Supporter Of Idi Amin?
- SathyaSaiBabaNews Wordpress Blog
- Proxy Defender Of Sai Isa And Barry Pittard
- Royal Liberty School Reunion 2003
- Robert Priddy - The Grinch
- Robert Priddy's Guru Foot Fetish

Robert Priddy - The Gullible Pseudo-Skeptic
- The Wax Lingam MIRACLE!
- Robert Priddy - The True Believer
- Robert Priddy's Telepathic Claims
- Priddy's Psychic Friend Conny Larsson
- Robert Priddy's Gullible / Brainwashed Years
- Erik Yaman Konuralp

Examples Of Robert Priddy’s Blatant Lies
- Typical Robert Priddy "Evidence" Trash
- Robert Priddy's Penultimate Lie
- Dr. Erlendur Haraldsson & Robert Priddy
- Pre-Senility Or Just Blatantly Inaccurate
- Robert Priddy's Fraudulent Information (or Archive)
- Materialized Green Diamond Rings? (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy’s Penchant For Prevarication (or Archive)
- Bogus "Photographic Evidence" Claim (or Archive)
- David Bailey? Really? (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy And His "Babafan" Lie (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy's Phony "Phone" Lies (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy Lies Again About Joe Moreno
- Robert Priddy's Personal Invites To Prashanti
- Priddy's Shameless Lie About Joy Thomas (or Archive)

Robert Priddy’s Pseudo-Moralism:
- Robert Priddy - The Pseudo-Moralist
- Pseudo-Moralist Robert Priddy

Robert Priddy & Kai Nicolai Priddy:
- Robert & Kai Nicolai Priddy (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy's Son Was Into Kink

Robert Priddy & VK Narasimhan:
- V.K. Narasimhan And Sathya Sai Baba
- VKN - VK Narasimhan

Robert Priddy’s Wikipedia Blunders:
- Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
- Say What? (or Archive)
- Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed (or Archive)
- Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt (or Archive)
- A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder (or Archive)
- Another Example Of Priddy's Poor Research (or Archive)

Defamatory Attacks Against Moreno Addressed:
- Defamatory Attack One: Response 1 (or Archive)
- Defamatory Attack Two: Response 2 (or Archive)
- Defamatory Attack Three: Response 3 (or Archive)

Disempowerment Articles & Responses:
- Robert Priddy: Response 1 (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy: Response 2 (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy: Response 3 (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy: Response 4 (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy: Response 5 (or Archive)
- Robert Priddy: Response 6 (or Archive

Robert Priddy On QuickTopic:
- QuickTopic Deception By Robert Priddy

Labels: , , , ,

The Laughable Sheila Waring Lie

Robert Priddy’s Laughable Sheila Waring Lie

About the pseudonym “sheila waring”, Kevin Shepherd said of Moreno:
kevinrdshepherd.net/html/23___sathya_sai_baba__problems.html
“His many blogs are often registered anonymously. He has resorted to many web pseudonyms such as Equalizer, vishvarupa108, and sheilawaring.”

About the pseudonym “sheilawaring”, Psychic Medium Conny Larsson said of Moreno:
saibabaexpose.com/sheilawaring.html
“Someone using the name ‘sheila waring’ reposted Moreno’s deleted postings on Netscape on July 9 2007- very soon after they had been banned and removed by Netscape. The identity of sheilawaring was concealed, but it is not hard to understad that this was either Moreno himself, or one of his proxies - it makes no real difference. That he must have had a hand in it is beyond doubt. The links are all to his defamatory website at saisathyasai.com Here are screenshots of the pages posted by sheilawaring on Netscape, also subsequently deleted by the netscape administration.”

About the pseudonym “sheila waring”, Robert Priddy said of Moreno:
robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/sathyasaibaba-in-the-shadows/
“He has often avoided using his most known username (joe108) in favour of unidentifiable ones like Equalizer, sheilawaring, or - for most people less identifiable ones like visvarupa 108, SSS108 (on Wikipedia) GM, JM, GJM with or without the 108 suffix and so on All were gradually identified as being his. He has also used diverse IPs in his e-mails and comments, as has been documented on various occasions, though he tries to deny it, the proofs are there for any eventual further use. He denied he was equaliser until exposed definitively as such, and he denies that he posted on Netscape under the username sheilawaring - but he is exposed as having done that just after he had been banned under a previous pseudonym like JM108).”

Let it go on record that Moreno has never (ever), at any time, used the name “sheila waring” on digg.com, netscape.com (now propeller.com) or anywhere else for that matter. Contrary to Robert Priddy’s senile claims (which he has been spewing all over his blog in recent weeks), Moreno never “denied” using the name “Equalizer” on his blogs. Once again, Robert Priddy makes unsupported, unsubstantiated and un-referenced claims against Moreno.

In an attempt to bolster their absurd claims that Moreno used the “sheila waring” pseudonym, several screencaps were published on Conny Larsson’s website. And thank goodness they did! After seeing the screencaps, Moreno nearly fell out of his chair laughing because Ex-Devotee’s apparently confused “sheila waring” as a Pro-Moreno Activist when in fact “sheila waring” was an Anti-Sai Activist hiding under a fake name! “Sheila Waring” went through all of Moreno’s posts on Netscape and “sunk” all of them (meaning that “sheilawaring” casted votes against all of Moreno’s articles). This is why Moreno’s articles showed up under “sheilawaring’s” Netscape history. One can clearly see the text saying “Sunk On July 09, 2007 07:49pm” below Moreno’s posts. One can also see the text that says “This story has mostly negative ratings” on top of Moreno’s posts with the number of “sinks” made against his articles. Critics used numerous fake names on Netscape to “sink” Moreno’s articles and all of their fake names were banned, including Robert Priddy, Barry Pittard and Brian Steel’s accounts.

The screencaps provided on Psychic Medium Conny Larsson’s website (which was referenced by True Believer Robert Priddy and others) are provided below:



That’s right, Kevin Shepherd, Conny Larsson and Robert Priddy (all claiming a “scholar” or “professional” status) are too idiotic to read posts correctly (akin to their idiotic inability to read IP headers correctly, even attributing IPs generated by their own computers to Moreno).

What a bunch of pathetic and laughable stooges and loons!

Although Ex-Devotees whine and snivel about Moreno's alleged “pseudonyms”, one will not find a single complaint from any of them about the numerous incognito web identities used by Robert Priddy, Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, UsedByBaba, Barbara Dent and R.F.J. Sandt. Ex-Devotees even attempted to pass themselves off as various individuals (including Pro-Sai Activists and Moreno himself). This type of very disturbing online behavior has been fully documented by Moreno (Refs: 01 - 02).

Expect more spin, deflection and cover-ups from Ex-Devotees, who can’s even identify their own acts of subterfuge in action. Yes, this is exactly the type of shabby “research” and laughable “exposés” that Ex-Devotees typically peddle as the “irrefutable truth” to unsuspecting readers. They do the exact same thing in relation to Sathya Sai Baba as well.

Labels: , , , , , , ,