Robert Priddy Exposed

Exposing The Anti-Sai Extremist And Ex-Devotee Of Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba.

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Blog Index Of Articles So Far

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Blog Index Of Articles (Updated Monthly):

Miscellaneous
- Priddy's Primary Webpage Indexed On Porn Sites
- Is Robert Priddy Well Funded?
- Robert & Kai Nicolai Priddy
- Robert Priddy - The Pseudo-Moralist
- Robert Priddy's Pro/Anti Sai Baba Books
- Another Example Of Priddy's Poor Research
- Priddy's Shameless Lie About Joy Thomas
- Priddy's Disreputable Air-Signaller Training
- Robert Priddy's Drug Years
- Robert Priddy's Fraudulent Information
- Materialized Green Diamond Rings?
- V.K. Narasimhan And Sathya Sai Baba

Wikipedia Blunders:
- Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again
- Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
- Say What?
- Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
- Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie
- Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt
- A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder

Defamatory Attacks Addressed:
- Defamatory Attack One: Response 1
- Defamatory Attack Two: Response 2
- Defamatory Attack Three: Response 3

Disempowerment Articles & Responses:
- Robert Priddy: Response 1
- Robert Priddy: Response 2
- Robert Priddy: Response 3
- Robert Priddy: Response 4
- Robert Priddy: Response 5
- Robert Priddy: Response 6

Friday, September 15, 2006

Priddy's Primary Webpage Indexed On Porn Sites

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

It is 100% true that Robert Priddy's primary Anti-Sai webpage was indexed on porn sites because Priddy paid to get his Anti-Sai Site listed on SeekInsider.com (which is a no longer existent, pay-per-click Search Engine) under the Category: "World Wide Sex Com - World Wide Sex Directory - World Wide Sex" (View Google Cache)! Guess Mr. Priddles did not have the foresight to see that by listing his website on a World Wide Sex Directory, porn sites would index his site for content!







*tsk* *tsk*

Is Robert Priddy Well Funded?

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Conny Larsson is a self-professed multi-millionaire who has a close and intimate friendship with Robert Priddy.

Not only does Conny Larsson's Anti-Sai website ("saibabaexpose.com") link directly and primarily to Robert Priddy's Anti-Sai site on the main index page, Priddy and Larsson even sat next to each other when Larsson was soliciting his Anti-Sai Book, "Behind The Clowns Mask", at Stockholm Royal in Sweden:

Larsson And Priddy Sitting Beside Each Other



Conny's book promotion was nothing less than a cheap publicity stunt in which it was alleged that approximately 100 people attended and a reading was performed (hired?) by a Swedish actor, Per Ragnar.

Robert Priddy claimed that I am "well funded" although he can supply no proof that I have ever received any funds from anyone, anywhere or at any time. Robert Priddy does not even have circumstantial proof! Nevertheless, the fact remains that Robert Priddy has no less than 6 current Anti-Sai websites, 6 former Anti-Sai websits, 1 extensive Anti-Sai blog and happens to be a close associate of a self-professed multi-millionaire who is also an Anti-Sai Activist!

Priddy claimed that he is not funded, is retired and lives entirely off his university pension and savings (no doubt some of his saving coming from his Pro-Sai Book, "Source Of The Dream").

Isn't it strange that for someone living entirely off his pension and savings, Priddy had enough money to hire an entire filming crew to film a jeweler's comments that the green-stone ring that Sathya Sai Baba materialized for him was not a green diamond?



Priddy also has enough money to travel to Sweden, sit next to Conny Larsson and publicly promote Conny's Anti-Sai book. Since Priddy contends that I am "well funded" because I have 3 websites composed of many webpages, then Priddy is admitting that he is similarly "well funded" considering that he has 6 websites composed of many webpages.

Unlike Priddy, I think I have more of a right to suspect that he is being funded due to his close, intimate and continuing friendship with Conny Larsson, a self-professed multi-millionaire and Anti-Sai Activist.

Labels: , ,

Monday, September 11, 2006

Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Recently, Robert Priddy made the following statements on Wikipedia regarding Kreydick's deposition in Alaya Rahm's Failed Lawsuit Against The Sathya Sai Baba Society (emphasis added by me):
I subscribed to LINK - which website claims to be the No. 1 search facility for all US Court Records and I searched extensively for any depositions made in the Alaya Rahm case. My username there was dc98fd. No record of any deposition by Lewis Kreydick was found, not any reference whatever to the name of Lewis Kreydick. I contacted the support service of Court Records at detective@supporthelp.net for assistance, but they were also unable to find the materials I was seeking. Further, the data is not available on any other website found where US Court Records are available, such as at LINK when the correct case number is entered (i.e. 05CC01931). None of the Keydrick materials are formally available court documents, since - as is clear from the Court Record of self-dismissal by A. Rahm - they were not presented in court and the case was dropped. Therefore they are privy to the plaintiff and defendents and their lawyers, which means they are not official, independent sources. A signed statement from the Clerk of Court that these depositions can be regarded as official and public would otherwise be required.

Several persons have contacted the Clerk of Court directly on our behalf at Orange County Court. A former devotee living in California visited the Orange County Court in August (2006) and obtained all the available public documents relating to the Alaya Rahm self-dismissal case. They are:-

-CASE ID 05CCO1931 REGISTER OF ACTIONS REPORT - PAGES 1 TO 5 [RUN DAT 21-JUN-2006 RUN TIME 11.26 AM

-PROOF OF SERVICE (c.c.p. SECTION 1013 (A),2015.5 (REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL)

-APRIL 20 2006 FILED =- SELF-DISMISSAL - COURT CONSENT

-SERVICE LIST

Not one of these documents includes any depositions by the Sathya Sai Society, OR ANY REFERENCE TO SUCH A DEPOSITION. Lewis Kreydick was not named in any of the documents. I have scans of all the documents, as paid for to the Clerk of Orange County Court.

we assert they have not been released as public information BY THE COURT, hence as independent sources.

Where, therefore, has the Court instructed and given consent on the monitoring of access to the Kreydick deposition record? I am acting within the guidelines of Wikipedia in removing reference to this and will continue to do so until independent and controllable proof is provided that the Clerk of Court can provide such documents, in which unlikely case I shall require that exact information on how such documents were provided, so that I can also obtain them. I am interested in the result of Moreno's contacts with the Clerk of Court and expect him in the interests of truth to provide documentation of the response he gets, whether pro or contra his case. The fact STILL remains, there is no independently sourced information about the Lewis Kreydick deposition.

On the Superior Court Of California Website → Click on Case Info → Click On "Accept Terms" → Click On "Case" → Enter the Case Number "05cc01931" → All of the pertinent information about Alaya Rahm's self-dismissed court case are provided. All items under "Register Of Actions" can be obtained by the general public (for a fee) because they are now public record. This can be confirmed through the records department: (714) 834-2200 → Press 1 for English → Press 6 → Press 0 → Request the records department → Inquire about obtaining records listed on County Court Of Orange website (however, they cannot give specifics over the phone, i.e., names and content).


Superior Court Of California Website:

*** On 3/16/2006, under "Stipulation - Other", Kreydick's deposition was obtained: Reference.

*** On 4/17/2006, a "Proof Of Service" was filed: Reference.

*** On 4/17/2006, 4 motions were filed in limine by the Society (showing under "Motion/Hearing-Other"). Kreydick's deposition is attached as an exhibit to motion in limine number 4 (with court file stamp showing) and is a part of the official court record: Reference.

Therefore, Kreydick's deposition was filed as part of the official court record. One need only request the four motions made on 4/17/2006 to verify this fact. Furthermore, the scans show the stamp on the top of the page that clearly states: "FILED Superior Court Of California County Of Orange Central Justice Center, APR 17 2006".

Also, since Anti-Sai Activists claim they are in contact with Attorney Brelsford, they should have no problem verfiying this information. Since Anti-Sai Activists apparently have not contacted Attorney Brelsford, it appears that Anti-Sai Activists are once again making hollow claims that they cannot back up whatsoever.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
Lies Relating To Wikipedia:
» » Robert Priddy's Phony "Phone" Lies
» » Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
» » Say What?
» » Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
» » Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie
» » Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt
» » A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder
» » Another Example Of Priddy's Poor Research

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, September 08, 2006

Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

After many years of hiding in his hole, Robert Priddy decided to make his grand entrance on Wikipedia and fell flat on his face. Priddy (utterly and completely incapable of a rational discussion) babbled and lied himself into the limelight, only to expose himself as a whiny, garrulous and spiteful person who cannot conduct even the most remedial of reseach before jumping to unsupported conclusions and shamelessly lying about others unapologetically.

Now everyone can see how Priddy truly conducts himself in public and how he operates on the premise of paranoia, suspicion and presumption of guilt with no proof! Apparently, Priddy's paranoia is not limited to Sathya Sai Baba. It seems to be a permanent mind-set.

Unfortunately for Mr. Priddles, his lies are now part of the permanent record on Wikipedia. I have written about these shameless and bold-faced lies on this blog. See "RELATED BLOG LINKS":

I will conclude by saying, "I told you so".

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
Lies Relating To Wikipedia:
» » Robert Priddy And His "Babafan" Lie
» » Robert Priddy's Phony "Phone" Lies
» » Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again
» » Say What?
» » Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
» » Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie
» » Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt
» » A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder
» » Another Example Of Priddy's Poor Research
Other Bold-Faced Lies:
» » Robert Priddy And His "Babafan" Lie
» » Priddy's Shameless Lie About Joy Thomas

Thursday, September 07, 2006

Say What?

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

On the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Talk Page, Robert Priddy said:

SSS108 (Gerald 'Joe' Moreno) is an extremely active pro-Sai activist with four pro-Sai websites containing altogether many hundreds of pages pushing his POV wholly one-sidedly (as witnessed here on Wikipedia) as he also does on several blogs and numerous bulletin boards, most especially and in sexually-explicit language on Yahoo Groups sathyasaibaba2. (Reference).

First of all Priddy needs to tell us the names to my "four pro-Sai websites". I only have three: Vishvarupa.com, Sai-Fi.net and SaiSathyaSai.com. What is the name to my "fourth website"?

Secondly, Robert Priddy accused me of using "sexually-explicit language on Yahoo Groups sathyasaibab2". Why doesn't Priddy cite examples? I am not aware of using any kind of "sexually explicit" language on the SSB2 Yahoo Group. I most certainly have quoted obscene, vulgar and "sexually explicit" language from Sanjay Kishore Dadlani (whose "sexually explicit" language Priddy has never complained about).

Priddy also does not complain about his 3 Anti-Sai Sites, Sanjay's 22 blogs, Reinier's 17 sites and their numerous and wholly one-sided posts on the internet numbering in the thousands! I don't see Priddy complaining about Barry Pittard "numerous posts" on bulletin boards and forums. In Priddy's dictatorial world, only Anti-Sai Activists are entitled to express their views and others are not. Sounds rather cultish, if you ask me.

Come on Mr. Priddles, back up your comments for once!

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
Lies Relating To Wikipedia:
» » Robert Priddy's Phony "Phone" Lies
» » Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again
» » Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
» » Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
» » Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie
» » Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt
» » A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder
» » Another Example Of Priddy's Poor Research

Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Vitriolic Lies About Me Having A Guru

Robert Priddy — aka ProEdits (talkcontribs) aka 84.208.99.96 (contribs) aka 80.111.21.76 (contribs) — said (emphasis added by me):
"I have not stated that SSS108 [Gerald Moreno] is a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, nor that he is Moreno's guru since he surprisingly declared this himself after some time about 2 years ago" (Reference).

Priddy made this comment after I stated that I am not a follower of Sathya Sai Baba (Reference). I never "declared" Sathya Sai Baba as my guru "2 years ago". This is a bold-faced and unsourced untruth. Regarding Priddy's comments that he never stated that Sathya Sai Baba was my guru (on Wikipedia), look at the following quotes where he stated exactly that:
"In my haste I thought the user page was specifically related to the attempt by Gerald Moreno, a person who defames and stalks me throughout the web because I am a critic of his guru, Sathya Sai Baba" (Reference).

"I feel I do at least have a moral right to refute arguments directed against me...and will be further injured by a subjective account by a Sai follower, if it is not truly an independent public document" (Reference).

"He is not only a defamer and critic of me, but of all critics of his highly doubtful guru, Sri Sathya Sai Baba..." (Reference).

Even more proof that Robert Priddy is a pathological liar. I am very happy that Priddy decided to come out of his hole and expose himself for the mean-spirited and paranoid deceiver that he is. Robert Priddy is wholly unbelievable and he can't be trusted. Something I have been saying for a very long time.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
Lies Relating To Wikipedia:
» » Robert Priddy's Phony "Phone" Lies
» » Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again
» » Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
» » Say What?
» » Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie
» » Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt
» » A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder
» » Another Example Of Priddy's Poor Research

Wednesday, September 06, 2006

Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Like a person spiralling completely out of control (or suffering from early stages of senile dementia), Robert Priddy is making more erroneous accusations against me without even performing even the most remedial of research. If Priddy does this to me, one can only imagine to what extent he does this with Sathya Sai Baba.

On June 11th 2006, a person with the IP 210.210.37.103 submitted a comment on the Sathya Sai Baba talk page that stated the following:
Hii Mr Kazlev, This is the anonymous poster. Hope you are doing well. By the way, due to your suggestion, i've selected a pseudonym which will be "Mad". I also agree with your comment on the inefficiency of the whole process of the endless argument and fights to get over a point. Many a times i've thought about the amount of time people spend on this page about editing, reverting and what not...And used to think that if the people over here click on the link www.thehungersite.com during that time or send that link to other people they know, more hungry people will get food. At the same time, till now, i haven't seen anything that would not lead me to a conclusion of not supporting what SSS108 has been doing. If everybody left this page thinking that its difficult to face the bickerings, onslaught of edits (covert and overt), then this page would certainly wouldn't have improved. This is more important when there has been "co-incidence" edits at many a point of time whenever there comes a report which is pro Sathya Sai. So while i would prefer to spend my time clicking on www.thehungersite.com, i would like to extend my support to SSS108 with the work he is doing. Mr Kazlev, so we can join up together to increase the number of clickings on www.thehungersite.com Hope you accept my invitation. "Mad"'' (Reference)

Robert Priddy (using the name "ProEdits) wrote the following about this comment:
Editors, please note how Moreno replies to a question with a derogatory diatribe and an assertion of "madness! Who is most obsessed with propaganda, Andries or Moreno, is as clear as day to those who read even a fraction of the endless Morenos' web pages and postings and the comparatively very few by Andries.--ProEdits 14:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)'' (Reference)

This is yet another blatant lie by ProEdits against me. I did not make that post. Robert Priddy is jumping to conclusions a prirori and defames me with his unsupported, erroneous and spiteful accusations.

This from someone who claims he knows how to research his facts and claims he is honest and truthful. I think the facts show otherwise. Just more proof that Robert Priddy can't get his facts right even though the truth is right there in front of his nose.

Priddy now owes Lisa De Witt one more apology and owes me two.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
Lies Relating To Wikipedia:
» » Robert Priddy's Phony "Phone" Lies
» » Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again
» » Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
» » Say What?
» » Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
» » Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt
» » A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder
» » Another Example Of Priddy's Poor Research

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Robert Priddy made the following comment about Lisa De Witt on the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia article:
We are not the ones who need to be careful as we do not break the laws on slander as Freelanceresearch has done on Yahoo groups sathyasaibaba2 endlessly... the same Lisa de Witt having even been banned from Wikipedia for that previously too! As usual, she makes big claims without anything that can be called supporting evidence - circumstantial or otherwise, as is seen above. I am stating fact, not slander without using derogatory terms like 'sleazy' (Refs: 01 - 02).

According to the Wikipedia Block Log For Freelanceresearch, she has never been "banned from Wikipedia" (although Andries tried and failed).

Another shameless lie and from ever-so-inaccurate Robert Priddy. It is also amusing to point out that Priddy, after having pressure put on him by both Lisa De Witt and myself, admitted that he made a mistake and retracted his comment. He said:
I wish to correct my former statement that Lisa de Witt was banned from Wikipedia. I find I was misinformed by someone who commented thus, but - having checked thoroughly - I find no evidence of it. I am removing my unfortunate mistake. Interesting that Lisa de Witt admits that she and Moreno are co-responsible for the mean-spirited atmosphere here - this was also obvious long, long before I entered this page with some fairly restrained comments about them (Reference).

As if this can't be embarrassing enough, Lisa never "admitted" that we were "co-responsible for the mean-spirited atmosphere". As a matter of fact, Lisa said:
Joe and I are not the ones responsible for the mean-spirited atmosphere here. Wherever the anti-Sais travel their toxic behavior and agenda of hate and lies goes with them (Reference).

Is Robert Priddy reading without his glasses on or is something mentally wrong with him? Priddy owes Lisa another retraction.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
Lies Relating To Wikipedia:
» » Robert Priddy's Phony "Phone" Lies
» » Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again
» » Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
» » Say What?
» » Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
» » Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie
» » A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder
» » Another Example Of Priddy's Poor Research

A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Robert Priddy made a defamatory and whiny complaint against me on Angela's Wikipedia Talk Page: Reference.

Since Priddy made his comment on the top of Angela's talk page (instead of the bottom where it should have been made) Angela moved Priddy's comment to the bottom of the page where it belonged: Reference.

Because Angela moved the comment, Priddy (unable to find his previous comment) reposted it again: Reference.

Without any proof, and foaming at the mouth, Priddy then erroneously claimed that I removed his post. He said:
You will see the determination of Moreno to stop you knowing what I wrote by the fact that he has deleted my request to you in your user paeg (see below on the discussion page). Just goes to emphasizse my point. Moreno is a full-time stalker and defamer. Robert Priddy (Refs: 01 - 02)

(Yes, those typos are Priddy's) That's right! Robert Priddy claimed I removed the text and jumped to the worst case conspiratorial view and insulted me as a "stalker" and "defamer" although Angela moved Priddy's comment herself. I never touched or edited that page!

Talk about pre-senile dementia. Typical Robert Priddy paranoia!

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
Lies Relating To Wikipedia:
» » Robert Priddy's Phony "Phone" Lies
» » Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again
» » Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
» » Say What?
» » Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
» » Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie
» » Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt
» » Another Example Of Priddy's Poor Research

Robert & Kai Nicolai Priddy

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

On Wikipedia, Robert Priddy took his smear campaign against me public and complained to a Wikipedia editor named "Angela" about me using his "copyrighted" picture of him and Kai Nicolai Priddy. Robert Priddy said:
Hi Angela, You may recall that you originally enabled the Robert Priddy page on Wiki. On that page I have come under attack there with the following edit: "Contrary Viewpoints A Closer Look At Robert Priddy And His Claims Against Sathya Sai Baba by Gerald Moreno" He has threatened (on the Robert Priddy discussion page) me with deletion of my page and various links to my websites if I do not allow this 'Contrary Viewpoint' to stand. Well, I would accept reasonable and rational fact-based criticism of my work and my activities. However, as you can see if you open the Moreno website against me he not only unlawfully uses a photograph of myself and my son (which he has refused to remove after polite requests from my son), but he copies materials from my books and websites unlawfully, infringing copyright. I can provide full details of these infringements, if it is not obvious enough just by visiting his pages. Moreno attacks all critics of the self-proclaimed God the Father, Sathya Sai Baba, and goes out of his way to defame them and invade their privacy. He is a persistent stalker of critics of Sai Baba, phoning any person he can to try to dig dirt of them. Please look at one example on the webpage of a prominent critic of Sai Baba, Mr. Conny Larsson, and not least also. Therefore, Thanking you for any assistance you may be able to offer to adjudicate in this matter. I would ask you simply permanantly to remove the entry by Moreno on the Robert Priddy page, without - as he suggests - altering any of the links to my websites in my page or on the Sathya Sai Baba main page. Only if he should remove from his pages all clearly defamatory statements against myself and the copyright photo and non-permitted use of my texts. Thanks, Robert Priddy (Reference)

The following picture is the one Priddy is whining about:

Robert And Kai Nicolai Priddy
First of all, this picture was not copyrighted protected to anyone, including Robert and Kai Priddy. It was a public picture that Priddy submitted himself to a public site for others to see. The picture did not come with a copyright notice and I did not take the actual image. Rather, I took a screen-capture of the publicly accessible site, along with the URL (Ref: Picture Not Showing Because It Was Deleted From The Server).

View My Email Correspondence With Kai Nicolai Priddy

Apparently, Priddy thinks I am infringing on his copyrights but thinks nothing when he and his fellow Anti-Sai thugs publicly duplicate pictures of Goldstein, Tigrett and V.K. Narasimhan on their sites! The same was done with my picture and not once did Priddy ever complain about it. However, once the tables were turned, Priddy became a venomous whiner, spewing his frothing-at-the-mouth rhetoric about "copyright infringement".

One will also notice how Priddy repeated the lie that I am "phoning any person" I can get a hold of. This amounts to nothing less than prevarication and neither Priddy or his Anti-Sai thugs can provide any proof of me phoning anyone, anywhere, at any time in relation to the Sai Controversy. Priddy also formerly accused me of "openly claiming" I contacted "the Sathya SaiOrganisation in the U.K. by telephone (Mr Bhagwani)" who replied to my questions, etc (Ref). Of course, Priddy cannot source this claim because I never made it! Priddy just makes stuff up from the top of his pre-senile mind and expects others to blindly believe it (as he apparently has).

Amusingly enough, Priddy thinks that he is perfectly entitled to promote his Anti-Sai Website on Wikipedia without being challenged in any manner, fashion or form! Priddy thinks his slander and defamation against Sathya Sai Baba are justified and any negative information about him is unjustified.

Tough luck Mr. Priddles.

Monday, September 04, 2006

Defamatory Attack Three: Response 3

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Robert Priddy's Erroneous Accusations Against Me
Moreno's posting on his his website are endorsed by the "heart-toheart Group" of Radio Sai (under the authoritarian leadership of Vice-Chancellor of Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning, G. Venkataraman) in e-mails linking to Moreno's website! Thus the Vice-Chairman of the International Sathya Sai Organisation endorses Gerald Moreon's slanderous and untruthful website!

Leave it to Robert Priddy (the well-known and fully exposed deceiver, plagiarist and embellisher) to distort the facts with misinformation and over-generalized statements. I am not aware of Venkataraman personally emailing anyone with links to my site. There was a circulating e-mail from the "Heart2Heart Team" relating to my article about Alaya Rahm's Failed Lawsuit (no link to my site provided). As a matter of fact, the email inaccurately cited information from my site. The email stated the following:
TRUTH ALWAYS TRIUMPHS
Sai Ram Dear Subscriber!

Here is an important news.

As you are aware, for quite some time now, totally unfounded, despicable, pernicious and absolutely false rumours have been circulating about our Beloved Swami. Not only have these rumours been spread through e-mails and the internet, but some unscrupulous TV channels have enough gone so far as to fabricate so-called documentaries and aired them in many countries.

Over the years, we have received from devotees across the world, many e-mails and letters expressing deep distress and
anguish. In respect of spreading falsehood, the notorious BBC documentary appears to have hurt most.

We now have some very good news for all devotees, especially for those who for years have been suffering the pain of seeing all these rumours and false allegations being eagerly lapped up by the gullible.

The news is this:

The young man who made most of these allegations against Swami and who was the star accuser in the malicious and vicious BBC documentary, filed a case in California in January, 2005.

The case was set for hearing on April 28 th, 2006.

During the handling of the lawsuit, witnesses were identified and interviewed, who were present in Prashanti Nilayam, when the molestations alleged by the plaintiff were supposed to have taken place.

One of the witnesses, Mr. Kreydick was examined by lawyers and the proceedings were recorded on video tape. This happened on March 16 th, 2006 . Subsequently, the video deposition was made into a typed deposition, which Mr. Kreydick signed on April 7 th, 2006. He also issued a personal statement to the effect that although he originally believed in the allegations made against Sai Baba, he later discovered that there were many critical discrepancies and contradictions in the allegations made by the plaintiff and the anti-Sai community in general. His said that all these allegations had a hidden bias. He therefore retracted his earlier position in support of the allegations.

This marked the turning point. The young man who filed the complaint then dismissed his own lawsuit on April 19 th, 2006.

The case was then dismissed with prejudice. It means no damages to the plaintiff, and that the case can never be filed again in any court in America or in India.

Yes, dear Subscriber! Truth always triumphs!!

Please spread the good news to all you know and do everything you can so that Sai devotees everywhere hear this news immediately and rejoice.

The message that has come out, loud and clear is that TRUTH ALWAYS TRIUMPHS, though it takes its own sweet time to do so.

Soon, Radio Sai and H2H will bring to you a special feature giving you all the details of this glorious triumph.

Meanwhile, rejoice.

Once again, we request that you share this good news with as many as you can.

Let it spread like wild fire, burning away all the residual doubts and misgivings.

Thank you and JAI SAI RAM.

With Love and Regards,
"Heart2Heart" Team.

Kreydick did not issue any "personal statement" claiming that he originally believed in the allegations and retracted his former beliefs. I am the person who made those comments and it was inaccurately attributed to Kreydick. If I was really involved with the Heart2Heart Team one can be certain that this misinformation would never had been emailed to anyone. As a matter of fact, I have never been contacted by anyone from RadioSai or the "Heart2Heart" team (except for an apology from them after emailing them about their oversight regarding Kreydick). Since no link to my site has ever been published on the RadioSai website, or in their emails, no one is "endorsing" me as Robert Priddy erroneously contended. Therefore, Priddy lied about the Heart2Heart Team "linking to" and "endorsing" my site. The Heart2Heart Team's reaction to Alaya Rahm's Failed Lawsuit was entirely justified. Alaya's self-dismissed court case has been nothing but a total embarrassment for the Anti-Sai Movement.
Though Moreno alleges otherwise , he is de facto as official an Internet spokesperson for defence of the entire International Sai Organisation as there is, which is abundantly evident from his many web pages and that he has no other work but is well-funded (unlike myself, being retired and living entirely on my university pension and savings).

Where is Priddy's proof that I "have no other work"? Where is Priddy's proof that I am "well-funded"? Since Priddy contends that he is an honest person, certainly he can back up all of these claims with verifiable information. Right? Unfortunately, Priddy does not provide a scintilla of proof or evidence from any reliable sources to back up any of his claims against me (which he does with Sathya Sai Baba as well). Priddy loves to speculate and create frenzied conspiracy theories because he is a paranoid and pathetic liar, deciever and twister of the truth.
For example, he openly claims to have contacted the Sathya SaiOrganisation in U.K. by telephone (Mr Bhagwani) who has replied to his questions etc. This alone shows he is working in the interests of the Sai Organisation also with the full knowledge and endorsement of the UK President of the National Sathya Sai Organisation and Central Coordinator for UK etc. Further, he has claimed on a bulletin board personally to know 'several' of the five persons who were given brand new expensive cars by Sathya Sai this year (paid for by donations of devotees!!), one of which five was none other than Venkataraman!

Robert Priddy is telling his big fat lies again. Where did I say I contacted the Sathya Sai Organization in th U.K. or Mr. Bhagwani by telephone? I never said that, nor has it ever happened! More bold-faced lies from Robert "Robin" Priddy. The only person I contacted by email was the webmaster for the Sathya Sai Website (in the USA) about a misprint they made in reference to a meeting that occurred at Harrow High School, not at Westminster. This oversight was promptly corrected by the webmaster.

Westminster sent a letter to Ashok Bhagani in which they expected him to correct an error on the Sathy Sai Website although they never sent him a link or reference to the page in question and although Bhagani is not the webmaster for the Sathya Sai Website!

Because of this misprint, Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard jumped to the worst case conspiratorial view and accused the entire Sai Org of "Disinformation & Subterfuge". Priddy & Pittard continued to accuse the entire Sai Org of subterfuge even after the correction was made. These are the extremists who are attempting to portray themselves as rational, sober and balanced. They nit-pick and obsess over trivial details and caricature them like people suffering from mental abnormalities.
Correction and additional notes: (July 15th, 2006): Due to information from a colleague who was contacted by Gerald Moreno, the IP 4.240.213.36 has now been located on e-mails he has sent (the IP he himself claimed was there - on a mail to Conny Larsson - click here] , and I have been shown [click here] that this server is currently located at Angel Fire, New Mexico. Due to blocking of Moreno unwanted mails via my server, I have received no e-mails since the first couple years ago - which I soon trashed, so I could not trace him. Further information provided me shows that - since he began his defamation campaign against Sai Exposé writers - he has also variously mailed from the following IPs: IP 4.240.144.145 [Las Cruces, New Mexico click here] and anonymous (Loopback) at 127.0.0.1.

So the truth now comes out that Anti-Sai Activists have my IPs when they formerly claimed they did not. Robert Priddy does not provide any headers to the alleged anonymous IP he accused me of having used. He does not cite which email it was found on. No details. Nothing. Also, Robert Priddy recieved emails from me (and gave responses) even after he said I was blocked from his server (Reference). This is the way Robert Priddy deals with people who ask valid and just questions that challenge his flimsy authority and lamentable arguments against Sathya Sai Baba. Priddy throws a hissy fit and blocks people (yes, there are others) from his server and glibly states: "Your e-mail is now blocked as you are persona non grata with me."
It has also been pointed out to me that Gerald Moreno surfs anonymously (eg. having visited ExBaba.com pages with cloaked IPs for years) ,and now he has begun to visit ExBaba at last using his own IP from Las Cruces [no doubt as damage limitation and further basis for more denials about his long struggle for anonymity].

Where is the proof that I have surfed the ExBaba site under a "cloaked IP for years"? Why hasn't anyone pointed this out before (until now, years later)? What is the cloaked IP that the Exbaba site is claiming I used? How would the ExBaba site know it was me if I was under a cloaked IP? Since I am a webmaster, I know how IP tracking works and IPs are only saved for a month at the most. Also, this issue regarding my IP is a recent one. No one ever complained about my IP or that I was using a "cloaked IP" until just recently. One is left to wonder why the Exbaba site was tracking my IPs all these years and never brought up the issue before?
The new IP is a variant on an old one he used in mails to various people: IP 67.0.212.28 (click here). I am further informed that Moreno has used the IP 67.0.237.191 [located by DOTS GeoPinpoint at Farmington, New Mexico] in a previous mail sent from visvarupa108. He also recently sent a mailform to Exbaba, which was forwarded to me, with theIP 67.0.236.65 [located by Melissa data as being at Farmington, New Mexico] but, strangely, also located by GeoSelect version II at Deming, New Mexico! (click here) All this makes quite clear that Moreno IS using various different IPs from various locations, including cloaked IPs to visit exposé websites (all of which his response time to new postings shows he scours almost daily!).

I have 3 local dial-up access numbers. Each access number resolves to a different location because my ISP is not located in New Mexico (it is a national ISP) and each access number is routed differently. Anyone with multiple access numbers knows this to be an indisputable fact. Many IPs do not resolve to the exact city the user resides in. Usually, but not always, the IP resolves to the State the person is residing in. Since Priddy has all these IPs for me, obviously, I did not try to hide my IP in the past, am not doing so now and never have. Robert Priddy has no proof that I used a cloaked IP. He is speculating, being untruthful and continues to make comments supplying no verfiable data whatsoever.
Gerald Moreno has refused to give and address, phone number or other means of checking his identity both before and since it was allegedly posted by Reinier van der Sandt on some now extinct website. It is certain that he uses other anonymous IP's on the Internet, shown by information from the webmaster of ExBaba.com that none of the above-listed IPs for Moreno have ever appeared on the visitor tracking data of that website. Moreno advised Alan Kazlev to search the Internet for "Gerald Moreno 2540 S. Espina" did not match any documents. So this address - which Moreno seems to suggest was his as of 2005 - still cannot be confirmed independently. It now further appears, since he has moved to another IP area, that he would also have changed address since then. Therefore Gerald Moreno still hides as best he can operates anonymously as he can, hiding behind a name which is still publicly unverifiable by any independent source by which his identity can be established.

Robert Priddy, Reinier Van Der Sandt, Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O'Clery, other prominent Anti-Sai Activists and all alleged victims have refused to give their full address, a working phone number or other means of checking their identities. As a matter of fact, Robert Priddy refused to give out his phone number because he didn't want to have "unwanted disturbances". Although Priddy refused to give out his phone number, he hypocritically stated that I should! And to Anti-Sai Activists of all people! Priddy also defended Pittard's right to keep his address private and said about it, "one which any citizen has a right to keep private if he or she wishes". Apparently, Anti-Sai Activists are entitled to keep their addresses private but I am not!

"Reinier Van Der Sandt" (his "web name", real name unknown) published my full contact information on his website. Even the Anti-Sai Journalist, Ojvind Kyro, contacted me by phone. How could Kyro contact me if I am not who I say I am? Kyro relayed my contact details to Anti-Sai Activists, which they promptly published. Priddy and Anti-Sai Activists are now claiming that I am using a fake identity. They were absolutely convinced of my identity and blasted it on the internet when Reinier had his 77 attack pages (created in 36 days) against me (Ref: Look at the home.hetnet.nl/~r.v.d.sandt/ results).
Having been exposed time and again as a defamer hiding behind the Internet, Gerald Moreno is apparently trying to gain some credibility, a futile task in the eyes of any neutral observer who visits his contrived and slanderous web pages (i.e.if not for some hate-blinded Sai devotees). The reasons for Moreno's having tried to hide away for so long, and continuing to lieas low as he can, may be his fear of legal action, well knowing he has broken US copyright laws and would also be liable to conviction for unsupportable slander and defamation in a court of law. If he wishes to make his true identity available through confirmable sources without it being posted for all to see, he can - for example - send the necessary information - full independently verifiable of his identity - to Alan Kazlev or by Guestbook mailform to van der Sandt.

What a laughable and lamentable paragraph! Martin Alan Kazlev communicates often with Robert Priddy (as told to me by Kazlev himself). Kazlev criticized me even though he openly said (more than once) that he does not have the "time", patience", "interest" or "inclination" to research my claims or my site! Kazlev "skimmed" (his word) through my articles and drew superficial conclusions based primarily on the word of Anti-Sai Activists. Kazlev made many spurious claims about me and my website and I had to correct him numerous times. Click Here to view M. Alan Kazlev's amusing biography in which he rants about his past lives and refers to himself in a weird way (talking about his "non-human" and "human" sides and strange references to himself that change based on whether or not parethesis are used).

Some of the content on my website includes copyrighted material that has been duplicated under the premise of "fair use" in section 107 of the US Copyright Law (just as is done on Anti-Sai Sites). In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any such (and all) material on my websites is distributed without profit and is for research, commentary and reference purposes only. Unlike Anti-Sai Activists, I fully reference information cited on my website, provide full links and provide the full name to the author in question.

One will also notice how Robert Priddy is trying to threaten me with legal action. He can be certain that I am fully prepared to reciprocate and unlike him, I have a vast index of caches to support all of my comments. He can be certain that his unsupported and unverifiable defamations and slander against me will not go unchallenged or unheeded. This is not the first time that Anti-Sai Activists have attemtped to bully others with legal threats. Barry Pittard attempted to bully other with legal threats and even the Exbaba site stated in April 2005: "Their identities and locations are currently under professional investigation and they can then expect to face the consequences having left themselves wide open to hefty damages claim from a number of individuals."

Just more proof that Robert Priddy is a gossip queen who can't substantiate his comments with any sort of verifiable data.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » Defamatory Attack One: Response 1
» » Defamatory Attack Two: Response 2
» » Defamatory Attack Three: Response 3 (you are here)

Robert Priddy - The Pseudo-Moralist

Robert Priddy & Sanjay Dadlani: Two Peas In A Pod

Robert Priddy (erecting his moral and puritanical facade) criticized me for publishing images of a "pornographic kind" on my website. The picture that so deeply offended Priddy's wholesome moral views was the following merged image of Dadlani:

Buddha'lani
First of all, I did not create this picture. It was created by "PremaPerm" (a person who chooses to remain anonymous). Although Priddy was (allegedly) deeply offended by the picture above, he has never been offended by images of a "pornographic kind" posted by Anti-Sai Activists. Apparently, a drawing of Sathya Sai Baba receiving oral sex from a child under his robe and Sathya Sai Baba holding a barbell with his penis meet Robert Priddy's low standard of "morality". The following images were posted by Reinier Van Der Sandt on the SSB2 Yahoo Group (and a colorized version to the drawing was posted on Sanjay's claimed blogs: saibabaexposed & saibabatribune).



As a matter of fact, Sanjay Dadlani (under the name "Azra`iL") posted the following picture (among several other sexually suggestive pictures of women) on the Gaudiya-Repercussions site as recently as August 6th 2006 (black bar added by me: Ref: Post #6):


Apparently all these images of a "pornographic kind" meet Robert Priddy's wholesome and pristine concept of decency, whereas the merged image of Dadlani does not! The image above further serves to highlight (once again) Sanjay's Serious Problems With Alcohol and his Strappy-Shoe Sex Fetish.

One must remember that Priddy fully associates himself with (and openly promotes) Sanjay Dadlani on his Anti-Sai website. Even though Sanjay has been fully exposed for exploiting innocent teenagers by secretly photographing them up their dresses and under tables with his digicam, and then posting over 300 of these deviant images on a secret blog (replete with illegal teen-porn links), Priddy completely disregards this behavior and blithely rants about his sensitivies toward sexual exploitation, images of a "pornographic kind" and other pseudo-moralistic claims.

These are the hypocrites, moral degenerates and so-called "exposers" of Sathya Sai Baba. They wag their tongues about morality and the disgusting nature of sexual exploitation yet ignore it among members of their own group.

Sunday, September 03, 2006

Defamatory Attack Two: Response 2

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Robert Priddy's Erroneous Accusations Against Me

Just recently, Priddy added the following paragraph about me on his new AngelTowns2 Anti-Sai Site. This page was deleted by Angeltowns due to its defamatory content. Therefore, Priddy moved it to his own site at chello.no/~reirob. The Chello.no site also deleted this page due to its defamatory content. Priddy moved it to the hetnet.nl/~exbaba site where it was deleted and moved once again to Priddy's site where it remains unsigned by him.
In many and various of the anonymous joe's web pages, though he claims not to be a member of the Sathya Sai Organisation himself, he attacks against every criticism raised about it on the thinnest of pretexts and without any documentation to back up his vague and offensive claims. He also tries to defend the indefensible actions of the current Sai Organisation world leader, International Chairman Dr. M. Goldstein, and he is clearly in league with Goldstein and other leading US Sai Organisation members and supporters. He is an old friend of Robert M. Baskin, a long-term Sai follower. Pretending to be an 'independent researcher', the Sai Organisation's pet stooge does their street-fighting for them with which they cannot afford to dirty their reputation further (since Sai Baba has ordered them not to answer any allegations whatever). It is done dirtily in that he attacks the many valid criticisms of its proven unaccountability and cult of secrecy and cover-up - mainly with shameless ad hominem arguments and hair-splitting decoy issues of a pitifully low level of knowledge and lacking investigation. He widely propagates lies and slanders and the wildest kinds of misinformation against any critics of Sai Baba so as to try to cloud the issue and cover up the many Sai Baba crimes that are most credibly alleged on a large scale by many. He has descended to the gutter level of other vulgar flamers and defamers - whom he also supports - on bulletin boards, such as sathyasaibaba2. He creates bogus e-mail addresses and names to make false submissions to the Sai Petition, which he also freely admits on his website, and he is guilty of counterfeiting, as has been shown by Basava Premanand. Last but far from least, he posts photos of critics of Sai Baba with distorted faces and added bodies of a pornographic kind! This is the level at which this anonymnous joe operates.

Robert Priddy is relating more scurrilous fabrications and gutter untruths against me under the guise of anonymity (the article is unsigned and does not link to any other page). Why doesn't this surprise me? I am not "an old friend of Robert M. Baskin". I have never met Robert Baskin in my life. I have no idea where Priddy got this total disinformation from.

Of course all of the "dirty" accusations that Priddy made against me are not cited or linked to, so they amount to nothing more than ad hominem attacks. I have directly cited Priddy's dirty and filthy websites (which were even indexed on pornographic sites due their vulgar content: References: 01 - 02). Therefore, I can support all of my opinions with verifiable information. Priddy cannot. Priddy bases his opinions on speculation and mental whimsy.

Anti-Sai's "valid criticisms" are not valid. They are wholly misleading, inaccurate and oftentimes (more often than not) drift into frenzied conspiracy theories.

Priddy also accused me of "lies and slander and the wildest kids of misinformation against any critics of Sai Baba". Why can't Priddy cite examples? Once again, I have backed up all of my opinions about critics with verifiable data (Reference). Priddy cannot back up his spurious claims against me.

Although Priddy accused me of supporting "vulgar flamers and defamers" (no names given), Priddy said absolutely nothing about his support for the "vulgar flamers and defamers" Tony O'Clery and Sanjay Dadlani. Sanjay Dadlani is the person who requested Jesus Pornography (Reference) and made grotesque, deviant, trashy, sleazy, slimy, misogynistic and racist comments on a blog he thought was private (which I discovered: Reference)! Priddy said absolutely nothing about their behavior (probably because they are his friends and fellow Anti-Sai Activists). Since Priddy has not spoken out against O'Clery and Dadlani's behavior, "one must conclude that in passively accepting their untruths, defamations and cover-up on their behalf, Priddy is satisfied with them"! More self-serving hypocrisy from Robert Priddy.

Basava Premanand has not proven me guilty of "counterfeiting" anything. Where is the proof? Premanand is another shameless liar who even accused me of being sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba (no kidding)! Notice how Priddy's friends have a propensity to exaggerate, mislead and lie?

Also, I did not create photos of critics "of a pornographic kind". I was sent images from "PremaPerm" in response to Dadlani's posting of "merged images" of Sathya Sai Baba on his blog. It is also revealing how Priddy starts ranting about images of a "pornographic kind" yet thinks nothing about an image depicting Sathya Sai Baba receiving oral sex, from a child, underneath his robe! Not only did Dadlani post that image, Sandt also posted it on the SathyaSaiBaba2 Yahoo Group (Reference). Priddy also sees nothing wrong with the "pornographic kind" of image that Reinier posted of Sathya Sai Baba holding a barbell with his penis. Apparently, these images meet Priddy's low standard of morality! Priddy thinks that those images are perfectly justified, but when the tables are turned, it is so unfair. Tough luck, Priddles! Robert Priddy has become a babbling, acidic and dark personality who bases his "truth" and "facts" on far-fetched conspiracy theories and a cult-like fascination for the unverfiable and unreal.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » Defamatory Attack One: Response 1
» » Defamatory Attack Two: Response 2 (you are here)
» » Defamatory Attack Three: Response 3

Defamatory Attack One: Response 1

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Robert Priddy's Erroneous Accusations Against Me

One would think that Robert Priddy would tire of misrepresentations, illogical speculations and conspiracy theories. Apparently, that is not the case. Just recently, Robert Priddy added the following paragraph on his site:
Please note: The only spokesman defending the Sathya Sai Organisation in public calls himself Gerald 'Joe' Moreno. He uses a hidden (anonymous) IP and his identity cannot be checked by any means (no CV, no known qualification or abode) He attacks the many valid criticisms of its proven unaccountability and cult of secrecy and cover-up and profusely propagates lies and slanders. He creates bogus e-mail addresses and names to make false submissions to the Sai Petition, which he also freely admits on his website. Neither the International nor any national or local Sathya Sai Organisation has rejected Gerald Moreno as their spokesman in the Internet, and so one must conclude that in passively accepting his untruths, defamations and cover-up on their behalf, they are satisfied with him. Though he alleges he is self-appointed , he is de facto as official an Internet spokesperson for defence of entire International Sai Organisation as there is, which fact is abundantly evident from his many web pages and the fact that he has no other work but is well-funded.

Robert Priddy is well aware that I am not using an anonymous identity. Robert Priddy chooses to lie for reasons he alone knows. As a matter of fact, my full name, full address and full phone number were publicly displayed on Reinier Van Der Sandt's (now deleted) website against me. Reinier is Priddy's friend.

Ojvind Kyro (a biased, Anti-Sai journalist) gave my contact information to Anti-Sai Activists after he tried contacting me by phone. Since Anti-Sai Activists have not been able to dig up dirt on me, they deleted their web pages against me and are now resorting to the fallacious claim that I am using an anonymous identity.

One must remember that these are the people who are "exposing" Sathya Sai Baba. They lack even the most basic integrity and do nothing but spread untruths and misrepresent facts. I fully know the depth of corruption and decay prevalent among Anti-Sai Activists (Robert Priddy included).

My IP's are not "hidden (anonymous)". I made/make no attempt to hide my IP's (my ISP has 3 of them for the area I live in, 1 resolves to Phoenix and 2 resolve to New Mexico) and they are recorded on Wikipedia, Yahoo Groups and even the emails I sent to Robert Priddy. My IP's are not even proxy IPs. They faithfully resolve to my ISP's destination and they have not changed in the past two years. It appears that Conny Larsson is behind the lie that I am hiding my IP address. As it turns out, Conny fed this lie to Priddy, who in turn is repeating it like a trained parrot. Click Here to see how I caught Conny lying about my IP.

My identity has been checked and discovered by Anti-Sai Activists. How would Ojvind Kyro get my phone number and call me if I am not who I say I am?

SaiPetition.net had, for many months, allowed anyone to submit multiple, fake signatures to their online petition against Sathya Sai Baba. After bringing my valid concerns (about the severely flawed submission policy on their site) to the attention of SaiPetition.net (and getting nowhere), I decided that the best way to prove that anyone could make multiple submissions was by doing so myself, and screen-capturing the results. I promptly divulged, on my website (Ref. 1), that I had made 5 fake submission, using the names: "Joe Apodaca", "Joe M", J M", "Kevin Iassa" and "Issac Nivek" ("Nivek" being "kevin" spelled backwards). I also provided a screen capture as proof (Ref. 2). These multiple submissions were made on September 27th & 28th 2004. SaiPetition.net found out about this and they only deleted (for some unknown reason) "Joe M" and "J M", refusing to remove "Joe Apodaca", "Kevin Iassa" and "Issac Nivek". SaiPetition.net formed an anonymous "committee" composed of six people, all who read my site, and critiqued my webpage on November 23rd 2004. Click Here to view their critique and my response. Consequently, the SaiPetition.net Committee read and knew about these multiple submissions.

Even though it was very clearly stated, on my website, that I made a fake submission using the name "Joe Apodaca", Robert Priddy took this fake submission and put it on his "Ex Office Bearers" page, using it as a first-hand account against Sathya Sai Baba! Needless to say, there was no way for Priddy to contact me (as I used a fake email as well), but the signature was regarded as authentic, without any sort of verification, and was cited on his page as a legitimate signature! I think this speaks volumes for the so-called "integrity" of SaiPetition.net's "signatures"! This also creates valid doubts to the authenticity of the names used on Priddy's "Ex Office Bearers" page. This proves that SaiPetition.net and Robert Priddy do not verify signatures in any manner, shape or form. Click Here to view the google cache (along with a google index image) to Robert Priddy's page, where he used this faked submission as a genuine and first-hand account from someone who was a "Prominent Ex Devotee Of Sai Baba"! Priddy has refused to remove the fake name, even though I informed him about it (through 2 different emails) almost 5 months ago!

Robert Priddy said, "Though he alleges he is self-appointed , he is de facto as official an Internet spokesperson for defence of entire International Sai Organisation as there is, which fact is abundantly evident from his many web pages and the fact that he has no other work but is well-funded." This is a perfect example of Priddy's conspiracy mentality. Priddy is making erroneous speculations with no proof (something he loves to do with Sathya Sai Baba). Of course, Priddy fails to tell everyone that he has several websites against Sathya Sai Baba. Using Priddy's logic (illogic) since he has/had 9 Anti-Sai Websites, "he has no other work but is well-funded". Robert Priddy's Sites are/were:
  1. home.no.net/rrpriddy/ (Personal Site) 102 pages

  2. home.no.net/anir/Sai/ (Active Anti-Sai Site) 410 pages

  3. home.no.net/abacusa/ (Active Anti-Sai Site) 13 pages

  4. home.chello.no/~reirob/ (Active Anti-Sai Site) 10 pages

  5. members.tripod.com/saisat0/ (Anti-Sai Site: Deleted for defamatory content) 5 pages

  6. www.angeltowns.com/members/tanik/ (Old Anti-Sai Site: Deleted for defamatory content)

  7. www.angeltowns2.net/tanik/SaiBaba/index.htm (New Anti-Sai Site (12/05): Deleted for defamatory content)

  8. robert-priddy.fulldisclosure.dyndns.org/ (Anti-Sai Site: Deleted for defamatory content)

  9. www.spaceports.com/~saiinfo/ (Anti-Sai Site: Deleted for defamatory content)

  10. metasci.tripod.com/ (Anti-Sai Site: Deleted for defamatory content) 2 pages

Click Here to view screen captures that show how Robert Priddy's site is listed on Porn Sites! It appears that Priddy paid to get his Anti-Sai Site listed on SeekInsider.com (which is a no longer existent, pay-per-click Search Engine) under the Category: "World Wide Sex Com - World Wide Sex Directory - World Wide Sex"! Click Here to see the Google Cache. Guess Priddy did not have the foresight to see that by listing his site on a World Wide Sex Directory, porn sites would reference his site for content! Who "funded" Priddy to put his site on this pay-per-click sex directory?

Priddy stated that, "Neither the International nor any national or local Sathya Sai Organisation has rejected Gerald Moreno as their spokesman in the Internet, and so one must conclude that in passively accepting his untruths, defamations and cover-up on their behalf, they are satisfied with him." The Sai Org. has not said anything about Lisa De Witt either. I guess the Sai Org. is "passively" satisfied with her too? Also, the Sai Org. has never said anything against Robert Priddy himself! Therefore, we must logically conclude (as Priddy illogically does) that the Sai Org. is "passively" satisfied with him as well! More asinine logical fallacies from Robert Priddy. His arguments are wholly absurd!

The fact of the matter is that Robert Priddy and his cohorts have made zero progress against Sathya Sai Baba. Of course, this has been a source of great consternation for Priddy (even more so with my public exposure of his lies, deceit and dishonesty). Priddy has a big problem telling the truth. He better argues his case by inferring the worst case conspiratorial scenario and by misrepresenting the facts. That is all he has, and one can clearly see how bitter he is about it!

Update: December 26th 2005: Just recently, Robert Priddy created a new and anonymous Anti-Sai Site on Angeltowns2 (Reference). Because I am familiar with Priddy's previous site on Angeltowns (which was deleted due to its defamatory content), I was able to identify it was his. Priddy withholds his identity on this site, yet hypocritically castigates me for withholding mine (although I do not withhold my identity)! Another glaring example of Priddy's self-serving hypocrisy in action.

Update: December 27th 2005: After publicly exposing Robert Priddy's new an anonymous Anti-Sai Site, Priddy & Co. rushed to do damage control by creating an index page (which was not originally there) and attributing the articles to Priddy (Reference). Now people can see how these former followers scramble to do damage control when they are exposed for their subterfuge, deceit and dishonesty.

December 27th 2005: AngelTowns2 deleted Priddy's site for defamatory content!

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » Defamatory Attack One: Response 1 (you are here)
» » Defamatory Attack Two: Response 2
» » Defamatory Attack Three: Response 3

Saturday, September 02, 2006

Robert Priddy's Pro/Anti Sai Baba Books

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Robert Priddy's Pro-Sai Book: Source of the Dream - My Way to Sathya Sai Baba, In Which He Praised Sathya Sai Baba As The Avatar Of The Age And God Incarnate.




Robert Priddy's Anti-Sai Book That Has Been Referred To By Two Names: End of the Dream. The Sathya Sai Baba Enigma & End of the Dream - The Fall of Sathya Sai Baba, Which Was Published By The Low-Class Atheist, Rationalist & Skeptic Basava Premanand.


Another Example Of Priddy's Poor Research

Robert Priddy: The Anti-Sai-Baba Extremist

Using the name "ProEdits" on Wikipedia, Robert Priddy claimed:
I subscribed to link - which website claims to be the No. 1 search facility for all US Court Records and I searched extensively for any depositions made in the Alaya Rahm case. My username there was dc98fd. No record of any deposition by Lewis Kreydick was found, not any reference whatever to the name of Lewis Kreydick. I contacted the support service of Court Records at detective@supporthelp.net for assistance, but they were also unable to find the materials I was seeking. Further, the data is not available on any other website found where US Court Records are available, such as at link when the correct case number is entered (i.e. 05CC01931). None of the Keydrick materials are formally available court documents, since - as is clear from the Court Record of self-dismissal by A. Rahm - they were not presented in court and the case was dropped. Therefore they are privy to the plaintiff and defendents and their lawyers, which means they are not official, independent sources. A signed statement from the Clerk of Court that these depositions can be regarded as official and public would otherwise be required. All these references should therefore be removed from the Sathya Sai Baba Wiki page. ProEdits 20:35, 29 August 2006 (Reference)

Robert Priddy makes strenuous and wholly futile attempts to propagate his disinformation campaign. Go to the Superior Court Of California Website → Click on Case Info → Click On "Case" → Enter the Case Number "05cc01931" → All of the pertinent information about Alaya Rahm's Self-Sismissed Court Case are provided. No "subscription" needed.

Another perfect example of Robert Priddy's exceedingly poor research. I was able to substantiate my claims within a couple of minutes of research. Priddy, on the other hand, subscribed (paid a fee) to a court record site, emailed people, searched other court record sites, came up empty handed and whined and babbled about it.

Keep whining and babbling Mr. Priddles. It's what you do best.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
Lies Relating To Wikipedia:
» » Robert Priddy's Phony "Phone" Lies
» » Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again
» » Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
» » Say What?
» » Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
» » Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie
» » Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt
» » A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder