Genital Oilings Expert - Robert Priddy

Dear Friends And Fellow Readers,

This article is part of a series written by Gerald Joe Moreno defending himself from absurd and libelous claims made by Ex-Devotees that he was “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba. Since Ex-Devotees (particularly Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy) unremittingly and ceaselessly disperse this blatant disinformation on their Wordpress blogs, a response is therefore necessary.

Robert C. Priddy’s Homoerotic Genital Oilings Fascination

Gerald Joe Moreno has already written a rather lengthy article exposing the Homoerotic Fantasizer Robert C. Priddy. Further strengthening the argument that Robert C. Priddy appears to be projecting his latent homosexuality onto others is the irrefutable fact that Robert C. Priddy ceaselessly drools and monomaniacally blathers about “genital oilings” and describes them with great relish and in great detail although he never received or witnessed a single “genital oiling” himself! Why does Robert C. Priddy express so much fascination and intrigue with alleged “genital oilings” when he knows absolutely nothing about them except from what he’s heard through others?

Since Robert C. Priddy never received a so-called “genital oiling” from Sathya Sai Baba, why does he present himself as a proxy authority on “genital oilings”? The few alleged victims who claimed they received “oilings” are nowhere to be found, are completely silent on the issue and have since long disappeared from the internet scene. Why is Robert C. Priddy foaming at the mouth, raising a huge wail, gnashing his teeth and acting as a proxy spokesperson for alleged victims when he has no direct experience of what he alleges to be “irrefutably true”? Robert C. Priddy’s homoerotic assumptions, homoerotic speculations and homoerotic conspiracies about “genital oilings” arise solely from his groin and not from any first-hand experience. Robert C. Priddy is not credible and cannot be trusted to accurately or honestly relay details about alleged “genital oilings” because he openly fabricated a “genital oiling” account against Gerald Joe Moreno (and adamantly refuses to print a retraction).

1. Robert C. Priddy is a laughable pervert who had the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Gerald Joe Moreno.


2. Robert C. Priddy is a laughable con-artist who published fraudulent screencaps against Gerald Joe Moreno and adamantly refuses to vindicate his claims by publishing full screencaps to Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain.


3. Robert C. Priddy is a laughable stooge who attributed his own computer’s IP to Gerald Joe Moreno.


4. Robert C. Priddy is in perpetual denial and publicly defends his laughable SheilaWaring Lie even though other critics have distanced themselves from that controversy.


5. Robert Priddy is a laughable LSD Advocate who even cited a Pro-Drug Forum intended for Drug Users to defend his LSD-induced hallucinations.


6. The list goes on and on.

The more Robert C. Priddy drools, squirms and obsesses over alleged “genital oilings”, the more one wonders why Robert C. Priddy is so thoroughly fascinated by that topic. More importantly, one is left to wonder why the parents to all of these alleged “victims” have never (ever) filed a single public grievance, basic police complaint or court case in India against the Guru.

Robert C. Priddy not only acts as a proxy spokesperson for alleged victims, he also acts as a “proxy guardian” because alleged victim’s mothers and fathers have all (without exception) failed in their moral, ethical and legal duties by ignoring the alleged molestations of their children. The reason why Robert C. Priddy does not shut up is because if he did, the silence would be deafening because no one else besides critics are making all the fuss.

Ex-Devotees (including Robert C. Priddy) ceaselessly reference the alleged credibility of Ullrich Zimmermann (a German ex-devotee of Sathya Sai Baba and current devotee of the alleged 35,000 year-old Lemurian Warrior and Ascended Master “Ramtha”). Although Ullrich Zimmermann made several unbelievable and graphic claims about Sathya Sai Baba (which he originally recalled while drunk at a Ramtha “wine ceremony”), Ullrich Zimmermann related an alleged oiling experience that was completely and wholly non-sexual.

According to Ullrich Zimmermann, Sathya Sai Baba rubbed materialized oil down the “kundalini line” on his chest and was instantaneously and miraculously cured of a chronic breathing ailment due to too much smoking. Although Ullrich Zimmermann apparently had nothing to hide and divulged alleged “tantric” experiences with the Guru, his only alleged “oiling” experience never involved his pubic region or genitals and he never had his pants pulled down.

Since Robert C. Priddy believes Ullrich Zimmermann (despite bashing and trashing channelers, mediums and New Age believers as belonging to the “lunatic fringe” seen in cults, ashrams and New Religious Movements), one is left to wonder why Robert Priddy ceaselessly fantasizes about “genital oilings” when Ullrich Zimmermann (who apparently had nothing to hide) described his “oiling” to be wholly and completely non-sexual. As a matter of fact, Ullrich Zimmermann’s mother is still a Sai Devotee and apparently felt that her son’s alleged encounters with Sathya Sai Baba were just as miraculous and wonderful as he described them to be. Ullrich Zimmermann even claimed that his alleged “white tantric” experiences with Sathya Sai Baba were “honors” conferred upon him (which made the person filming Zimmermann’s account gasp out loud)!

In conclusion, Robert C. Priddy needs to shut up and let the alleged victims and their mothers and fathers talk for themselves. The fact that alleged victims and their mothers and fathers are not talking strongly suggests that Sathya Sai Baba did nothing wrong. Robert C. Priddy should take his gripes to the parents of alleged victims and should be castigating them for ignoring their children’s alleged molestations.

Sathya Sai Baba has never (ever) been charged with any crime, sexual or otherwise and critics cannot provide a scintilla of credible or verifiable information to the contrary.

See:
- SaiSathyaSai: Exposing Critic’s Smear Campaigns Against Sathya Sai Baba

Is Robert Priddy A Latent Homosexual?

Is Robert Priddy A Latent Homosexual?

Dear Friends And Fellow Readers,

This article is very important for several reasons. First, it documents the vicious behaviors of Ex-Devotees of Sathya Sai Baba (who often claim they are “credible”, “honest,” and “sincere” individuals). Secondly, this article is important because it documents the unbelievable extents that Ex-Devotees of Sathya Sai Baba will go in order to malign, defame and libel others. Lastly, this article is important because it reveals the dubious standards that Ex-Devotees use to determine what they consider “sexual abuse” and/or “sexual molestation”.

Since former followers of Sathya Sai Baba unremittingly and falsely accuse Gerald ‘Joe’ Moreno of being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, Moreno’s story is unique and provides a revealing and telltale glimpse into the mindset, fanaticism and extremism that altogether exemplifies the Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba Movement.

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and who once fervently Worshipped And Kissed The Guru’s Feet) wrote more blatant disinformation on his Anti-Baba blog about Gerald Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist).

The case is easily made that Robert Priddy is a bitter, vindictive and sexually-debauched defamer and propagator of disinformation against Gerald Joe Moreno (henceforth referred to as “Moreno”). Ex-Devotee’s willful, malicious and obsessive claims about Moreno being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba has undeniably cast a dark shadow of suspicion and doubt on their self-professed and alleged “credibility”, “honesty” and “sincerity”.

Moreno has refuted the “sexual molestation” libels against him going back to July 2006. See:

1. Moreno Refutes Allegations Of Sexual Abuse


2. Robert Priddy Falsifies Sexual Molestation Claim (View Blog Version)


3. Sai Petition And More Sexual Abuse Libels (View Blog Version)


4. Dirty Old Man Robert Priddy (View Blog Version)


5. Moreno’s Response To Sanjay Dadlani

Let us take a look at what Robert Priddy wrote on September 26th 2009 (underlined and bold emphasis added by Moreno):

robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2009/09/26/gerald-morenos-wildest-attack-so-far
Robert Priddy: “His biggest point in his overwrought blog is that I wrote that Sai Baba pulled down his pants - which statement I did not attribute to him as he also claims.”

Let us take a look at what Robert Priddy wrote on April 1st 2009, which is still located on his blog as of September 30th 2009 (underlined emphasis added by Moreno):

robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/sathyasaibaba-specious-claims-and-self-defeating-arguments/
Robert Priddy: “Moreno has himself described how his pants were lowered by Sathya Sai Baba lowered and he was ‘oiled’ on his ‘lower stomach’.”

Therefore, Robert Priddy did in fact claim that Moreno “himself described how his pants were lowered by Sathya Sai Baba” (a bold-faced and gutter untruth and libel). Now, however, Robert Priddy would have everyone believe that he never attributed the “Sai Baba pulled down his pants” comment to Moreno when in fact he did attribute that comment to Moreno. This is the type of typical sleaze and typical disinformation that Robert Priddy peddles to unsuspecting readers on his Anti-Baba blogs and Anti-Baba websites on almost a daily (sometimes twice-daily) basis.

Robert Priddy is so forgetful, he cannot even recall what he wrote and what he said about Moreno. It would appear that Robert Priddy is exhibiting signs and symptoms that strongly suggest his mental faculties are failing him. Robert Priddy’s numerous “Not So Priddy Blunders” are fully documented on Moreno’s webpage entitled: Robert Priddy - Oslo, Norway.

Robert Priddy’s Homoerotic Imaginations
Now, let us take a look at Robert Priddy’s sexually-twisted and sexually-focused homoerotic imaginations relating to Moreno’s interview with Sathya Sai Baba:

Robert Priddy: “Nonetheless, I hold that Sai Baba MUST, in one way or another got to lower Moreno’s pants. He is reported as pulling down pants by many of those who describe molestations. To those who have not been to a Sai Baba interview, know that no young man [since at least the 1970s] could ever get into an interview with Sathya Sai Baba unless dressed in the traditional Indian white so-called ‘pyjama suit’ (usually of cotton, as seen in countless videos) The trousers are kepy up by a string tied at the front, or a belt in some less usual cases. Therefore, for Sai Baba to be able to massage ‘the lower stomach‘ it was customary (according to numerous testimonies) for him to require that the knot be undone and the cotton ‘pyjama’ lowered. To put his hand down the trouser without loosening the string would be extremely unusual (and would itself constitute as bad a violation as pulling down the young man’s pants). Now, whether Sai Baba asked or motioned to Joe Moreno to drop his pants, or whether he pulled the bow fastener himself is a matter of no consequence. He got where he wanted to go. His authority with those who believe him to be a great soul – and usually God Incarnate – means he can and does in effect ‘pull down pants’, however it is done. Moreno claims Sai Baba did not pull them down. This is only an attempt at an adroit avoidance of the issue – he was oiled on the lower stomach (by his own admission).”

Robert Priddy argued that Sathya Sai Baba “MUST” have lowered Moreno’s pants because others alleged it happened to them. This “MUST” mean that anyone who has ever had a private interview with Sathya Sai Baba “MUST” have had their pants lowered as well, which brings us to Robert Priddy’s private interviews. Did Sathya Sai Baba similarly lower Robert Priddy’s pants and is he “too embarrassed” to talk about it? It does not matter what excuses, defenses, denials or refutations Robert Priddy gave or will give, his private interviews “MUST” be viewed in the exact manner as he views Moreno’s private interview.

1. Just as Robert Priddy denies Moreno’s first-hand account, one must similarly deny Robert Priddy’s first-hand account.


2. Just as Robert Priddy ignores Moreno’s claims of not being sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba, one must similarly ignore Robert Priddy’s claims of not being sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba.


3. Just as Robert Priddy concludes that Moreno is “too embarrassed” to talk about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, one must similarly conclude that Robert Priddy is “too embarrassed” to talk about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba.

Needless to say, Moreno does not believe that Robert Priddy was molested by Sathya Sai Baba. Rather, Moreno is attempting to show how Robert Priddy’s self-serving and irrational arguments could be mirrored back at him and would implicate him in the very same situation he tries to place Moreno.

Robert Priddy has never been able to refute or shake off similar accusations made against him by Leo Rebello. See: Leo Rebello’s $1,000,000 Legal Threat For Defamation Against Robert Priddy.

Let it go on record that Moreno did not wear white pajama clothing on his first visit to see Sathya Sai Baba and most certainly did not wear white pajama clothing in his interview with the Guru. As a matter of fact, Moreno was wearing grey jeans with a belt and a grey button-down shirt! Since Moreno was new to Sathya Sai Baba’s ashram, he did not dress in white pajama clothing like other devotees because he did not originally plan to visit the Guru (Moreno visited Sathya Sai Baba only after a miraculous experience he had while in Calcutta). Although Moreno was advised (several times) to wear white pajama clothing at the Guru’s ashram, he could not find any clothing that fit him properly and decided to wear his own Western clothes instead.

Since Robert Priddy is a sexually imbalanced person who relies on homosexual fantasies and homosexual imaginations to make his arguments against Moreno, it is not really surprising that Robert Priddy considers the belly button to be part of one’s genitals!

Robert Priddy is absolutely clueless about the details of Moreno’s interview. Robert Priddy actually had the audacity to fabricate stories against Moreno by resorting to assumption, speculation and conspiracy. If Ex-Devotee’s have the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims are they fabricating as well?

Moreno has consistently and repeatedly denied Ex-Devotee’s absurd claims that Sathya Sai Baba pulled down his pants. Even though Moreno’s statements are well documented, Robert Priddy continues to argue (like a drooling and insatiable pervert in utter denial) that Moreno’s first-hand account is to be rejected while Priddy’s libidinous speculations are to be accepted! This is the Golden Standard that Ex-Devotees use to determine who has been “sexually abused” or “sexually molested” by Sathya Sai Baba.

Robert Priddy’s Disturbing Homosexual Fantasies
Robert Priddy is a big advocate of psychological projection and often uses “psychological projection” as an argument to defend himself and belittle his detractors. Using the argument of “psychological projection”, Robert Priddy appears to be 100% “projecting” latent homosexual desires onto Moreno that are manifesting as obscene, erotic and explicit homosexual fantasies that involve his former Guru.

All of Robert Priddy’s graphic and sexual descriptions about what he speculated and imagined happened to Moreno in his interview with Sathya Sai Baba arise solely from Priddy’s groin and not from any factual, verifiable or known writings from Moreno.

Robert Priddy is continually and obsessively immersing himself in graphic, homosexual fantasies that involve specific homosexual acts that he imagines and visualizes to be true although they are not based in reality or on any known writings by Moreno. It would appear that Robert Priddy is obtaining some sort of deviant sexual arousal by intensely imagining and visualizing homosexual acts involving Moreno and his former Guru.

Robert Priddy’s Miscellaneous Homoerotica
Strange enough, Robert Priddy’s own son (Kai Nicolai Priddy) belonged to an industrial band from Norway that used dildos and transvestites as theatrics in their music performances (Ref). Apparently, the apple didn’t fall far from the tree.

Although Robert Priddy originally interpreted his Sai-related dreams to be blessings from the Guru, he currently argues that Sai-related dreams are the result of one’s subconcious desires and projections. Robert Priddy dreamed that Sathya Sai Baba kissed him on the mouth and drew up impurities associated with his “muladhara chakra” (Source Of The Dream by Robert Priddy; “Enigmas of Suffering and Healing”, pp. 174-175). The muladhara chakrum is the subtle “sex center” often associated with sexual energy, sexual desire and the genitals.

Therefore, using Robert Priddy’s current interpretations of Sai-related dreams, it would appear that he entertained sexual desires for his former Guru, which were projected into the dream state where his subconscious desires manifested as his former Guru kissing him on the mouth and sucking up and swallowing a substance drawn from his astral sex-center! Since Robert Priddy formerly attributed significance to this dream, his current views about Sai-related dreams has solidly situated himself between a rock and a hard place!

Robert Priddy’s Homoeroticism - In Conclusion
It is a fact that heterosexual men are not known to enjoy projecting, imagining and visualizing homosexual acts between other men (as Robert Priddy has done and continues to do). It is also a fact that heterosexual men are not known to enjoy re-writing non-sexual stories and making them into homo-erotic stories full of graphic and homosexual descriptions based on flights of imagination (as Robert Priddy has done and continues to do). Therefore, a strong argument could be made that Robert Priddy appears to be a sexually frustrated, sexually obsessed and ambiguously sexually oriented individual in need of orthodox psychosexual help.

Robert Priddy (one of the main spokespersons for the Anti-Sai Movement) embodies the perversion, deviancy and pruriency that are widely prevalent among critics of Sathya Sai Baba. Blinded by his own hate, Robert Priddy presents himself as the single most persuasive argument why one should not believe the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba. For that, Robert Priddy is to be thanked.

Fundamentalist Christian Label

Fundamentalist Christian Label

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) made the following comments on his Anti-Sai conspiracy blog about Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist):

Robert Priddy: “Invidiously, Joe Moreno calls me ‘a blatant liar’ many times obviously without any tangible proof because I can assure that I never lie. He is fond of childish name-calling and smearing through labeling: egs. he accused me of being a “fundamentalist Christian” (I am 100% agnostic!)”

Robert Priddy’s penultimate lie is that he “never lies”! Moreno already refuted Robert Priddy’s claim that he “never lies” here. Moreno has written several “Fighting The Smears” articles (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06 - 07) refuting Robert Priddy’s bold-faced lies, including multiple sexual abuse libels against Moreno.

Robert Priddy formerly attempted to argue that a “lie” is a false statement deliberately presented as the truth. Robert Priddy contended that since he is not relating his untruths deliberately, he is not “lying”. However, when Robert Priddy’s “untruths” are brought to his attention, he deliberately refuses to correct or retract them; meaning he is not only deliberately perpetuating lies, he is a bold-faced and shameless liar.

Right after Robert Priddy boasted that he “never lies”, what did he do? He lied! Robert Priddy falsely claimed that Moreno accused him of being a “fundamentalist Christian”. Moreno never (ever) accused Robert Priddy (even indirectly) of being a “fundamentalist Christian”.

The only thing that Moreno ever wrote about “fundamentalist Christians” in relation to Robert Priddy was a radical Christian website that duplicated Priddy’s webpages in full (the webpages have since been removed from the internet, but archive.org still has the archived link with no text) to push their Anti-Baba and Anti-Hindu agendas. Moreno did not (at any time) accuse or imply that Robert Priddy was a “fundamentalist Christian”. The argument Moreno made was that there are Christian groups pushing Anti-Baba and Anti-Hindu agendas (which Priddy denied several times): See For Yourself.

Therefore, WHERE exactly is Robert Priddy getting his disinformation from? He most certainly did not get it from Moreno’s websites. Why is it that Robert Priddy tries so hard to present himself as an honest and moral individual, yet repeatedly makes unsubstantiated and unsupported comments that are never referenced to verifiable sources?

It is exactly erroneous “untruths” (i.e., “lies”) like these that give impetus to the perception that Robert Priddy may be suffering from senile dementia (which he may have inherited from his mother, who suffered from severe memory loss for many years).

Robert Priddy Is Not A Fundamentalist Christian But A True Believer In Psychics, Spiritual Healers And A Self-Proclaimed Prophet:
Let it go on record that Moreno has never (ever) claimed (nor does he believe) that Robert Priddy is a “fundamentalist Christian”.

Robert Priddy is, however, a pseudo-moralist who continually attempts to con the general public into thinking he is entirely given to scientific reasoning, when in actuality he is a true believer and a fierce defender, promoter, endorser, solicitor and friend of various self-professed psychics, trance mediums, reiki healers, guru wannabees, superstitionists, eccentric spiritualists, astrologers (including his own son, Kai Nicolai Priddy, who is heavily into astrology and is the webmaster for AbacusAstrology.co.uk) and other "lunatic fringe" Baba bashers.

Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard (the main spokespersons for the Anti-Sai Movement) promote, endorse and/or profess friendship with:

1. Trance Channeler & Self-Proclaimed Prophet Conny Larsson


2. Guru Promoter, UFO Conspiracist & True Believer PhD Timothy Conway


3. New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev


4. Self-Proclaimed Spiritual Master ‘Ramana Baba’


5. Ramtha Devotee Ullrich Zimmermann


6. Fetishist & Hare Krsna Congregational Member Sanjay Dadlani


7. Reiki Master And Spiritual Healer Yaman Konuralp

As a matter of fact, both Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard attempt to defend themselves against Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist) by directing their readers to either:

1. Self-Proclaimed Prophet Conny Larsson's website (located at saibabaexpose.com)


2. Reincarnator, New Age Advocate and Grungy Integral Philosopher Alan Kazlev's website (located at kheper.net)

How's that for "scientific" or "rational"? Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard are obviously very gullible and naive "true believers" who are willing to give credence to non-scientific beliefs by claiming that trance mediums, self-proclaimed prophets, aura readers, seance conductors, New Age advocates, guru adherents, self-proclaimed reincarnators and the like are intelligent, honest, credible and reliable individuals worthy of being referenced by them (so-called “scholars” and “academics” not given to lunatic fringe or superstitious beliefs)! To Date: Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard adamantly refuse to say one word about their promotion and endorsement of these "lunatic fringe" (Priddy's favorite slur) individuals.

Robert Priddy Is Not A Fundamentalist Christian But A Promoter Of LSD And A Pro-Drug Forum Intended For Drug Users:
Robert Priddy was also an LSD advocate and eulogized his own LSD-induced hallucinations for well over 46+ years! See:

1. Robert Priddy - An Advocate For Drug Users And LSD


2. Robert Priddy’s Removal Of Biographical Data From Personal Website


3. Robert Priddy’s Biographical Suppression


4. Robert Priddy’s “The Psychedelic Experience” (or Archive 01)


5. Robert Priddy’s “Truth, Being And Bliss” (or Archive 01)


6. Robert Priddy’s “A Vision Of Cosmic Energy” (or Archive 01)


7. Robert Priddy’s 30+ Year Glorification Of LSD

Robert Priddy Is Not A Fundamentalist Christian But Believes That Sathya Sai Baba Possesses Genuine Paranormal Powers:
And to top it all off, Robert Priddy believes (even to this day, after his defection) that Sathya Sai Baba possesses genuine paranormal powers:

Robert Priddy: “Nonetheless, it will surely surprise some that I am still almost certain - on the basis of extended personal observation - that Sathya Sai Baba can and does carry out apports, which therefore can appear as materialisations from nothing.”

Apports are said to be physical objects in existence that are dematerialized from one location and rematerialized to another.

Robert Priddy: “Some of what I experienced of SSB’s extraordinary and positive powers through many years is undeniable, even after the most rigorous skeptical investigations, and I do not regard him as any ordinary human being. I have simply had to realize that his actions in the worldly and human sphere are not infallible and are not always setting a perfect example for others.”

Robert Priddy believes that Sathya Sai Baba possesses genuine paranormal powers because the Guru cured him of a debilitating and chronic neck and spinal problem that no one else could cure and whose symptoms no doctor could alleviate. Robert Priddy claimed that Sathya Sai Baba cured him through a series of “dream-operations” that resulted in a literal and physical transformation of his spine, which was supported by x-rays and the testimony of Mr. Kylie (“an osteopath and master of various other disciplines”).

Robert Priddy also claimed that Sathya Sai Baba freed his mother from chronic pain and that a small speck of Sathya Sai Baba’s vibuthi instantaneously cured his paralyzed cat when it suffered from what appeared to be a stroke.

Robert Priddy tries to make the case that Sathya Sai Baba:

1. Is both a fraud and genuine.


2. Both can materialize objects and fakes materializations.


3. Both can cure diseases but really can’t cure diseases.

Needless to say, Barry Pittard also believes that Sathya Sai Baba has genuine paranormal powers. These are the equivocators and deeply conflicted individuals who are attempting to portray themselves as sober, rational and scientific!

Robert Priddy is not a fundamentalist Christian, but he is a liar and a fanatic equivocator with proof!

Robert Priddy's Lies Spiral Out Of Control

Robert Priddy's Lies Spiral Out Of Control

Joe Moreno has had to write several “fighting the smears” articles (Refs: 01 - 02 - 03 - 04 - 05 - 06) to refute Robert Priddy’s internet propaganda, libels and complete disinformation.

In yet another illustrative example of Robert Priddy’s fairy-tale mentality (which appears to be the onslaught of senile dementia) is a complete and utter fabrication of facts against Moreno on his Anti-Baba conspiracy blog. Robert Priddy said:

Robert Priddy: “His case rested mainly on his having been able to make some false submissions to the petition before it was protected properly from such spamming (in its new location) - including a bogus entry he boasts about having made under the bogus name Joe Apodaco or the like. [Note that Joe Moreno gave no documentary proof he made that entry. However, it was removed just in case.]

At the same time Moreno states that he wrote (under the pseudonym) he had been “sexually abused” in the comment accompanying the sabotage signature! Interestingly - and perhaps unconsciously revealing a Freudian slip - for Joe Moreno was actually abused by Sathya Sai Baba, though he denies that the lowering of his pants and massaging with oil on his “lower stomach” was what the law (even in India) defines it as - sexual molestation when not performed with consent by a doctor of medicine. (See Basava Premanand’s discussion with Moreno on this)”

Sai Petition And The ‘Joe Apodaca’ Submission:
Click Here To Read More About The Bogus ‘Sai Petition’ that Robert Priddy made reference to. Of course, Robert Priddy miserably failed to inform his readers (as he typically does) that Moreno was able to submit multiple submissions to the Newer Sai Petition and those submissions were approved by the Sai Petition administrators!

The Older Sai Petition allowed for anyone to submit as many comments he/she so desired without any sort of verification process in place (with an admission from Robert Priddy himself). Therefore, the first 824 “signatures” on the Older Sai Petition have rightly been called into question by Robert Priddy himself. Thank you Mr. Priddles!

Why should Moreno provide “documentary proof” that he submitted the name of “Joe Apodaca” to the Sai Petition? If the Sai Petition is truly a legitimate and legal petition (as critic’s allege) they should be able to contact “Joe Apodaca” and verify the submission for themselves. The fact that critic’s were/are unable to verify Joe Apodaca’s submission is “documentary proof” enough that Moreno made it!

Robert Priddy Falsifies Yet Another Sexual Abuse Claim:

Robert Priddy: “At the same time Moreno states that he wrote (under the pseudonym) he had been “sexually abused” in the comment accompanying the sabotage signature!”

Robert Priddy falsely claimed that Moreno stated he had been “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba under the pseudonym of “Joe Apodaca”! Robert Priddy completely fabricated this claim and (once again) cannot source it to any verifiable references whatsoever.

However, Moreno can reference his rebuttal that he never (ever) submitted a signature to the bogus Sai Petition with any comment claiming (even indirectly) that he was “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba. See for yourself (names submitted were “Joe Apodaca”, “Joe M”, “J M”, “Isaac Nivek” and “Kevin Iassa”):



Under the name “Joe Apodaca”, Moreno said: “I had a friend who died at Sathya Sai Baba’s ashram”. Nowhere did Moreno claim (even indirectly) that he was “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba as falsely and maliciously stated by senile Robert Priddy. See a screencap of the Google search results for yourself:


Moreno also sent Robert Priddy an email about the name “Joe Apodaca” on July 24th 2005:

From: Joe (July 24th 2005)
Subject: Remove Fake Name:
To: Robert Priddy

Dear Mr. Priddles,

I wanted to bring to your attention that you have published a fake name on your “Ex-Office Bearers” site, located at:

http://home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/EX-OFFICE%20BEARERS.htm

If you had only cared to read my site a little more thoroughly, you would have noticed that I clearly stated that “Joe Apodaca” was one of several fake names I used to expose the inherent dishonesty in the submission policy at SaiPetition.net. I even provided a screen capture to these fake names (which has been on my site since November 2004)!

Check for yourself:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/sathya-sai-baba-and-petition-saipetitionnet.html

Although I used various derivatives of my name ‘Joe’ (2 of which were deleted from SaiPetition.net), I did not lie about knowing someone who died at Sathya Sai Baba’s Ashram. Michael Oliver was a very good friend of mine (his parents live 50 miles away from me). I was amazed that you met him (I read about it in your book). He never mentioned your name to me. Not even once.

At any rate, it makes one wonder why you would publish someone’s name, and a comment they made, without caring to verify their identity or their claim. This nicely makes my case that the signatures on SaiPetition.net are not verified (I happened to use a fake email as well). It also makes my case that Anti-Sai Activists (like yourself) disperse information ‘willy-nilly’, caring less for factual integrity and caring more for negative content.

Consequently, to save yourself further embarrassment, I suggest you make the necessary correction immediately. Although I must tell you that I have already screen captured the page and saved the cache. Maybe I can write an article, like the one you did with the Sai Organisation and the Westminster Cathedral? After all, you have such a fervent dedication to the truth, I am sure you wouldn’t mind if I applied the same standard to you that you apply to others.

Have a nice day.

Sincerely,

Joe Moreno

Further solidifying Moreno’s rebuttal are archived links going back to 2005 that prove Moreno never (ever) claimed he was sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba under his “Joe Apodaca” pseudonym:

1. View Original Article About The Apodaca Signature
   
   
   
   • Or View The November 19th 2005 Archive
   
   
   
   


2. View The Fake Name Google Cache
   
   
   
   • Or View The July 7th 2006 Archive
   
   
   
   


3. View Email Correspondence With Robert Priddy
   
   
   
   • Or View The July 19th 2006 Archive
   
   
   
   

Robert Priddy is a dirty old man who loves to tell dirty stories about others. Barry Pittard (a pseudo-moralist and heart-string-plucker extraordinaire) loves to revel in Robert Priddy’s dirty stories and actually endorses them! Of course, Barry Pittard has his own fair share of criticism regarding his highly questionable past. How can anyone believe anything Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard have to say about Sathya Sai Baba when they shamelessly libel others?

Pervert Priddy Continues Sexual Abuse Libels:
Robert Priddy formerly libeled Moreno as being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba and claimed that Moreno said his pants were lowered by the Guru! Of course, Moreno never (ever) made the fabricated claims that Robert Priddy attributed to him. Now, however, Robert Priddy is claiming that Moreno said his “lower stomach” was “massaged” with oil by Sathya Sai Baba. Moreno never (ever) claimed he was “massaged” with oil. Alan Kazlev (Robert Priddy’s psychic & reincarnating friend) is to be attributed with that disinformation.

The big question is:

WHY is Robert Priddy so sexually focused on Moreno’s non-sexual interview?

Robert Priddy is like a sexual deviant who can’t stop fantasizing about the possibility that Moreno was sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba and keeps on twisting Moreno’s words with sexual innuendo and sexual inferences not rooted in fact.

1. If Robert Priddy openly falsifies sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims is he fabricating as well?


2. If Barry Pittard openly endorses falsified sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other falsified sexual molestation claims is he endorsing as well?

One must remember that Robert Priddy is actually trying to make the argument that even though Moreno explicitly stated he was not sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba, one must ignore Moreno’s first-hand words and clarifications and instead rely on Robert Priddy’s sexual inferences based on descriptions he fabricated against Moreno! This from a man who claims he has not told a single lie!

Robert Priddy should stop embarrassing himself and the Anti-Sai Movement he defends. As one can see, Robert Priddy’s failing memory (strongly indicative of senile dementia) is getting him into a lot of trouble. Robert Priddy’s proven pathological lies have thoroughly compromised his so-called credibility and integrity. Those who support Robert Priddy’s gutter untruths (such as Barry Pittard, Timothy Conway, Kevin Shepherd, Alan Kazlev, Brian Steel, Serguei Badaev, Reinier Van Der Sandt, Andries Krugers Dagneaux, Basava Premanand, et al) are similarly compromised.

What next will come out of Robert Priddy’s mouth (besides spit, invective, libel and disinformation)? One can be certain that many things will come out of Robert Priddy’s mouth, but the truth won’t be one of them.

Pervert Priddy Fantasizes Molestation

Pervert Priddy Fantasizes Molestation


Well, it has finally happened (just as I knew it always would)!

After many years of silently endorsing vicious defamers and libelers like Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O'Clery, Basava Premanand, UsedByBaba, Barbara Dent, Alan Kazlev, Conny Larsson, etc., Robert Priddy finally mustered enough courage to slither his way out of his gutter only to openly libel Joe Moreno as being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba! Let us take a look at Robert Priddy’s actual words (which I have saved, screencapped and sent to relevant individuals for legal purposes):

Robert Priddy: Why this perpetual backward pseudo reasoning from Moreno? It is a case of total denial of a compulsive kind. Moreno has himself described how his pants were lowered by Sathya Sai Baba lowered and he was ‘oiled’ on his “lower stomach”. Since this was not done by a doctor under consent, it was sexual interference without explanation (’grooming’ or testing for an erection) which objectively amounts to himself having been molested sexually (according to Indian law). Moreno did not perceive it as such, but few who go into the private room behind closed doors believing Sathya Sai Baba to be a divinity seldom do. The attention he felt this amounted to gave him a great lift, and he has stated that no one before Sai Baba had taken any notice of him! Few tell openly what happened, and Sai Baba warns most not to tell. This prominent fact in Moreno’s story is one which we may be allowed to question further. One obviously asks “how low”? Embarrassment in telling the facts accurately can fairly be assumed.

It goes without mention that Joe Moreno refuted and denied being sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba going back to July 2006 when he was first made aware of those attacks (Ref). Apparently Robert Priddy is following in the footsteps of his sexually-focused friend Sanjay Dadlani (who made similar accusations against Moreno). At no time did Moreno ever state that he had “his pants lowered by Sathya Sai Baba” (a bold-faced and gutter untruth). To the contrary, Moreno specifically stated, at no time were his pants ever pulled down. Robert Priddy is wholly unable to reference his bitter and venomous attacks against Moreno with any credible, verifiable or factual references because Moreno never (ever) made any of the claims falsely attributed to him by Robert Priddy.

Isn’t it strange that for someone who is alleged to have been “embarrassed” about being “molested sexually”, Moreno revealed the full details of his interview experience with Sathya Sai Baba on a public website (Ref)? Surely, if Moreno was so “embarrassed” about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, he would not have publicly mentioned it in the first place!

Robert Priddy also wrote the following about Moreno’s interview with Sathya Sai Baba:

Robert Priddy: He had posted it along with an account about himself and his visit to the ashram - and the private interview room - of Sathya Sai Baba (and his ‘oiling’ by him). Later he removed this as too compromising - but it was too late as it is downloaded and in good keeping.

Robert Priddy is a bold-faced liar. Moreno’s interview experience with Sathya Sai Baba was never removed from his geocities website. It is still available on the internet and Moreno has no intention of removing it: See For Yourself. Robert Priddy’s absurd claims about Moreno prove he is a pathological liar in need of orthodox psychological help.

Robert Priddy claimed he had private interviews with Sathya Sai Baba. Was Robert Priddy “molested sexually” and is he too “embarrassed” to talk about it as well? Priddy’s private interviews must be viewed in the exact manner as he views Moreno’s private interview. It does not matter what clarifications, denials or explanations Robert Priddy may give. He will not be free of the perception that he was “molested sexually” and is too “embarrassed” to talk about it.

Robert Priddy’s true colors have finally come to light. And thank goodness for that! Robert Priddy is (as people have been saying all along) a bitter, vindictive and sexually twisted liar who purposely distorts information against others to revenge his big & bruised ego and impotent arguments against Sai Baba. If Robert Priddy openly falsifies sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims is he fabricating as well?

Amusingly, Robert Priddy had the audacity to make several legal threats against Moreno for “defamation” (if the information is negative, but true, that is not “defamation”). Let Robert Priddy proceed with a legal case. He will be greeted with a swift countersuit of such proportions, sphincters will contract in his gaunt body that he never knew he had!