Genital Oilings Expert - Robert Priddy

Dear Friends And Fellow Readers,

This article is part of a series written by Gerald Joe Moreno defending himself from absurd and libelous claims made by Ex-Devotees that he was “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba. Since Ex-Devotees (particularly Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy) unremittingly and ceaselessly disperse this blatant disinformation on their Wordpress blogs, a response is therefore necessary.

Robert C. Priddy’s Homoerotic Genital Oilings Fascination

Gerald Joe Moreno has already written a rather lengthy article exposing the Homoerotic Fantasizer Robert C. Priddy. Further strengthening the argument that Robert C. Priddy appears to be projecting his latent homosexuality onto others is the irrefutable fact that Robert C. Priddy ceaselessly drools and monomaniacally blathers about “genital oilings” and describes them with great relish and in great detail although he never received or witnessed a single “genital oiling” himself! Why does Robert C. Priddy express so much fascination and intrigue with alleged “genital oilings” when he knows absolutely nothing about them except from what he’s heard through others?

Since Robert C. Priddy never received a so-called “genital oiling” from Sathya Sai Baba, why does he present himself as a proxy authority on “genital oilings”? The few alleged victims who claimed they received “oilings” are nowhere to be found, are completely silent on the issue and have since long disappeared from the internet scene. Why is Robert C. Priddy foaming at the mouth, raising a huge wail, gnashing his teeth and acting as a proxy spokesperson for alleged victims when he has no direct experience of what he alleges to be “irrefutably true”? Robert C. Priddy’s homoerotic assumptions, homoerotic speculations and homoerotic conspiracies about “genital oilings” arise solely from his groin and not from any first-hand experience. Robert C. Priddy is not credible and cannot be trusted to accurately or honestly relay details about alleged “genital oilings” because he openly fabricated a “genital oiling” account against Gerald Joe Moreno (and adamantly refuses to print a retraction).

1. Robert C. Priddy is a laughable pervert who had the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Gerald Joe Moreno.


2. Robert C. Priddy is a laughable con-artist who published fraudulent screencaps against Gerald Joe Moreno and adamantly refuses to vindicate his claims by publishing full screencaps to Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain.


3. Robert C. Priddy is a laughable stooge who attributed his own computer’s IP to Gerald Joe Moreno.


4. Robert C. Priddy is in perpetual denial and publicly defends his laughable SheilaWaring Lie even though other critics have distanced themselves from that controversy.


5. Robert Priddy is a laughable LSD Advocate who even cited a Pro-Drug Forum intended for Drug Users to defend his LSD-induced hallucinations.


6. The list goes on and on.

The more Robert C. Priddy drools, squirms and obsesses over alleged “genital oilings”, the more one wonders why Robert C. Priddy is so thoroughly fascinated by that topic. More importantly, one is left to wonder why the parents to all of these alleged “victims” have never (ever) filed a single public grievance, basic police complaint or court case in India against the Guru.

Robert C. Priddy not only acts as a proxy spokesperson for alleged victims, he also acts as a “proxy guardian” because alleged victim’s mothers and fathers have all (without exception) failed in their moral, ethical and legal duties by ignoring the alleged molestations of their children. The reason why Robert C. Priddy does not shut up is because if he did, the silence would be deafening because no one else besides critics are making all the fuss.

Ex-Devotees (including Robert C. Priddy) ceaselessly reference the alleged credibility of Ullrich Zimmermann (a German ex-devotee of Sathya Sai Baba and current devotee of the alleged 35,000 year-old Lemurian Warrior and Ascended Master “Ramtha”). Although Ullrich Zimmermann made several unbelievable and graphic claims about Sathya Sai Baba (which he originally recalled while drunk at a Ramtha “wine ceremony”), Ullrich Zimmermann related an alleged oiling experience that was completely and wholly non-sexual.

According to Ullrich Zimmermann, Sathya Sai Baba rubbed materialized oil down the “kundalini line” on his chest and was instantaneously and miraculously cured of a chronic breathing ailment due to too much smoking. Although Ullrich Zimmermann apparently had nothing to hide and divulged alleged “tantric” experiences with the Guru, his only alleged “oiling” experience never involved his pubic region or genitals and he never had his pants pulled down.

Since Robert C. Priddy believes Ullrich Zimmermann (despite bashing and trashing channelers, mediums and New Age believers as belonging to the “lunatic fringe” seen in cults, ashrams and New Religious Movements), one is left to wonder why Robert Priddy ceaselessly fantasizes about “genital oilings” when Ullrich Zimmermann (who apparently had nothing to hide) described his “oiling” to be wholly and completely non-sexual. As a matter of fact, Ullrich Zimmermann’s mother is still a Sai Devotee and apparently felt that her son’s alleged encounters with Sathya Sai Baba were just as miraculous and wonderful as he described them to be. Ullrich Zimmermann even claimed that his alleged “white tantric” experiences with Sathya Sai Baba were “honors” conferred upon him (which made the person filming Zimmermann’s account gasp out loud)!

In conclusion, Robert C. Priddy needs to shut up and let the alleged victims and their mothers and fathers talk for themselves. The fact that alleged victims and their mothers and fathers are not talking strongly suggests that Sathya Sai Baba did nothing wrong. Robert C. Priddy should take his gripes to the parents of alleged victims and should be castigating them for ignoring their children’s alleged molestations.

Sathya Sai Baba has never (ever) been charged with any crime, sexual or otherwise and critics cannot provide a scintilla of credible or verifiable information to the contrary.

See:
- SaiSathyaSai: Exposing Critic’s Smear Campaigns Against Sathya Sai Baba

Is Robert Priddy A Latent Homosexual?

Is Robert Priddy A Latent Homosexual?

Dear Friends And Fellow Readers,

This article is very important for several reasons. First, it documents the vicious behaviors of Ex-Devotees of Sathya Sai Baba (who often claim they are “credible”, “honest,” and “sincere” individuals). Secondly, this article is important because it documents the unbelievable extents that Ex-Devotees of Sathya Sai Baba will go in order to malign, defame and libel others. Lastly, this article is important because it reveals the dubious standards that Ex-Devotees use to determine what they consider “sexual abuse” and/or “sexual molestation”.

Since former followers of Sathya Sai Baba unremittingly and falsely accuse Gerald ‘Joe’ Moreno of being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, Moreno’s story is unique and provides a revealing and telltale glimpse into the mindset, fanaticism and extremism that altogether exemplifies the Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba Movement.

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and who once fervently Worshipped And Kissed The Guru’s Feet) wrote more blatant disinformation on his Anti-Baba blog about Gerald Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist).

The case is easily made that Robert Priddy is a bitter, vindictive and sexually-debauched defamer and propagator of disinformation against Gerald Joe Moreno (henceforth referred to as “Moreno”). Ex-Devotee’s willful, malicious and obsessive claims about Moreno being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba has undeniably cast a dark shadow of suspicion and doubt on their self-professed and alleged “credibility”, “honesty” and “sincerity”.

Moreno has refuted the “sexual molestation” libels against him going back to July 2006. See:

1. Moreno Refutes Allegations Of Sexual Abuse


2. Robert Priddy Falsifies Sexual Molestation Claim (View Blog Version)


3. Sai Petition And More Sexual Abuse Libels (View Blog Version)


4. Dirty Old Man Robert Priddy (View Blog Version)


5. Moreno’s Response To Sanjay Dadlani

Let us take a look at what Robert Priddy wrote on September 26th 2009 (underlined and bold emphasis added by Moreno):

robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2009/09/26/gerald-morenos-wildest-attack-so-far
Robert Priddy: “His biggest point in his overwrought blog is that I wrote that Sai Baba pulled down his pants - which statement I did not attribute to him as he also claims.”

Let us take a look at what Robert Priddy wrote on April 1st 2009, which is still located on his blog as of September 30th 2009 (underlined emphasis added by Moreno):

robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/sathyasaibaba-specious-claims-and-self-defeating-arguments/
Robert Priddy: “Moreno has himself described how his pants were lowered by Sathya Sai Baba lowered and he was ‘oiled’ on his ‘lower stomach’.”

Therefore, Robert Priddy did in fact claim that Moreno “himself described how his pants were lowered by Sathya Sai Baba” (a bold-faced and gutter untruth and libel). Now, however, Robert Priddy would have everyone believe that he never attributed the “Sai Baba pulled down his pants” comment to Moreno when in fact he did attribute that comment to Moreno. This is the type of typical sleaze and typical disinformation that Robert Priddy peddles to unsuspecting readers on his Anti-Baba blogs and Anti-Baba websites on almost a daily (sometimes twice-daily) basis.

Robert Priddy is so forgetful, he cannot even recall what he wrote and what he said about Moreno. It would appear that Robert Priddy is exhibiting signs and symptoms that strongly suggest his mental faculties are failing him. Robert Priddy’s numerous “Not So Priddy Blunders” are fully documented on Moreno’s webpage entitled: Robert Priddy - Oslo, Norway.

Robert Priddy’s Homoerotic Imaginations
Now, let us take a look at Robert Priddy’s sexually-twisted and sexually-focused homoerotic imaginations relating to Moreno’s interview with Sathya Sai Baba:

Robert Priddy: “Nonetheless, I hold that Sai Baba MUST, in one way or another got to lower Moreno’s pants. He is reported as pulling down pants by many of those who describe molestations. To those who have not been to a Sai Baba interview, know that no young man [since at least the 1970s] could ever get into an interview with Sathya Sai Baba unless dressed in the traditional Indian white so-called ‘pyjama suit’ (usually of cotton, as seen in countless videos) The trousers are kepy up by a string tied at the front, or a belt in some less usual cases. Therefore, for Sai Baba to be able to massage ‘the lower stomach‘ it was customary (according to numerous testimonies) for him to require that the knot be undone and the cotton ‘pyjama’ lowered. To put his hand down the trouser without loosening the string would be extremely unusual (and would itself constitute as bad a violation as pulling down the young man’s pants). Now, whether Sai Baba asked or motioned to Joe Moreno to drop his pants, or whether he pulled the bow fastener himself is a matter of no consequence. He got where he wanted to go. His authority with those who believe him to be a great soul – and usually God Incarnate – means he can and does in effect ‘pull down pants’, however it is done. Moreno claims Sai Baba did not pull them down. This is only an attempt at an adroit avoidance of the issue – he was oiled on the lower stomach (by his own admission).”

Robert Priddy argued that Sathya Sai Baba “MUST” have lowered Moreno’s pants because others alleged it happened to them. This “MUST” mean that anyone who has ever had a private interview with Sathya Sai Baba “MUST” have had their pants lowered as well, which brings us to Robert Priddy’s private interviews. Did Sathya Sai Baba similarly lower Robert Priddy’s pants and is he “too embarrassed” to talk about it? It does not matter what excuses, defenses, denials or refutations Robert Priddy gave or will give, his private interviews “MUST” be viewed in the exact manner as he views Moreno’s private interview.

1. Just as Robert Priddy denies Moreno’s first-hand account, one must similarly deny Robert Priddy’s first-hand account.


2. Just as Robert Priddy ignores Moreno’s claims of not being sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba, one must similarly ignore Robert Priddy’s claims of not being sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba.


3. Just as Robert Priddy concludes that Moreno is “too embarrassed” to talk about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, one must similarly conclude that Robert Priddy is “too embarrassed” to talk about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba.

Needless to say, Moreno does not believe that Robert Priddy was molested by Sathya Sai Baba. Rather, Moreno is attempting to show how Robert Priddy’s self-serving and irrational arguments could be mirrored back at him and would implicate him in the very same situation he tries to place Moreno.

Robert Priddy has never been able to refute or shake off similar accusations made against him by Leo Rebello. See: Leo Rebello’s $1,000,000 Legal Threat For Defamation Against Robert Priddy.

Let it go on record that Moreno did not wear white pajama clothing on his first visit to see Sathya Sai Baba and most certainly did not wear white pajama clothing in his interview with the Guru. As a matter of fact, Moreno was wearing grey jeans with a belt and a grey button-down shirt! Since Moreno was new to Sathya Sai Baba’s ashram, he did not dress in white pajama clothing like other devotees because he did not originally plan to visit the Guru (Moreno visited Sathya Sai Baba only after a miraculous experience he had while in Calcutta). Although Moreno was advised (several times) to wear white pajama clothing at the Guru’s ashram, he could not find any clothing that fit him properly and decided to wear his own Western clothes instead.

Since Robert Priddy is a sexually imbalanced person who relies on homosexual fantasies and homosexual imaginations to make his arguments against Moreno, it is not really surprising that Robert Priddy considers the belly button to be part of one’s genitals!

Robert Priddy is absolutely clueless about the details of Moreno’s interview. Robert Priddy actually had the audacity to fabricate stories against Moreno by resorting to assumption, speculation and conspiracy. If Ex-Devotee’s have the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims are they fabricating as well?

Moreno has consistently and repeatedly denied Ex-Devotee’s absurd claims that Sathya Sai Baba pulled down his pants. Even though Moreno’s statements are well documented, Robert Priddy continues to argue (like a drooling and insatiable pervert in utter denial) that Moreno’s first-hand account is to be rejected while Priddy’s libidinous speculations are to be accepted! This is the Golden Standard that Ex-Devotees use to determine who has been “sexually abused” or “sexually molested” by Sathya Sai Baba.

Robert Priddy’s Disturbing Homosexual Fantasies
Robert Priddy is a big advocate of psychological projection and often uses “psychological projection” as an argument to defend himself and belittle his detractors. Using the argument of “psychological projection”, Robert Priddy appears to be 100% “projecting” latent homosexual desires onto Moreno that are manifesting as obscene, erotic and explicit homosexual fantasies that involve his former Guru.

All of Robert Priddy’s graphic and sexual descriptions about what he speculated and imagined happened to Moreno in his interview with Sathya Sai Baba arise solely from Priddy’s groin and not from any factual, verifiable or known writings from Moreno.

Robert Priddy is continually and obsessively immersing himself in graphic, homosexual fantasies that involve specific homosexual acts that he imagines and visualizes to be true although they are not based in reality or on any known writings by Moreno. It would appear that Robert Priddy is obtaining some sort of deviant sexual arousal by intensely imagining and visualizing homosexual acts involving Moreno and his former Guru.

Robert Priddy’s Miscellaneous Homoerotica
Strange enough, Robert Priddy’s own son (Kai Nicolai Priddy) belonged to an industrial band from Norway that used dildos and transvestites as theatrics in their music performances (Ref). Apparently, the apple didn’t fall far from the tree.

Although Robert Priddy originally interpreted his Sai-related dreams to be blessings from the Guru, he currently argues that Sai-related dreams are the result of one’s subconcious desires and projections. Robert Priddy dreamed that Sathya Sai Baba kissed him on the mouth and drew up impurities associated with his “muladhara chakra” (Source Of The Dream by Robert Priddy; “Enigmas of Suffering and Healing”, pp. 174-175). The muladhara chakrum is the subtle “sex center” often associated with sexual energy, sexual desire and the genitals.

Therefore, using Robert Priddy’s current interpretations of Sai-related dreams, it would appear that he entertained sexual desires for his former Guru, which were projected into the dream state where his subconscious desires manifested as his former Guru kissing him on the mouth and sucking up and swallowing a substance drawn from his astral sex-center! Since Robert Priddy formerly attributed significance to this dream, his current views about Sai-related dreams has solidly situated himself between a rock and a hard place!

Robert Priddy’s Homoeroticism - In Conclusion
It is a fact that heterosexual men are not known to enjoy projecting, imagining and visualizing homosexual acts between other men (as Robert Priddy has done and continues to do). It is also a fact that heterosexual men are not known to enjoy re-writing non-sexual stories and making them into homo-erotic stories full of graphic and homosexual descriptions based on flights of imagination (as Robert Priddy has done and continues to do). Therefore, a strong argument could be made that Robert Priddy appears to be a sexually frustrated, sexually obsessed and ambiguously sexually oriented individual in need of orthodox psychosexual help.

Robert Priddy (one of the main spokespersons for the Anti-Sai Movement) embodies the perversion, deviancy and pruriency that are widely prevalent among critics of Sathya Sai Baba. Blinded by his own hate, Robert Priddy presents himself as the single most persuasive argument why one should not believe the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba. For that, Robert Priddy is to be thanked.

Source Of The Homoerotic Dreams?

When Robert Priddy was a Sai Devotee for 17 - 26 years, he gave tremendous importance to his dreams (especially those relating to the Indian Guru Sathya Sai Baba). Firmly believing that his Sai-related dreams were direct psychic contacts with the Guru, Robert Priddy wrote a Pro-Sai book entitled “Source Of The Dream - My Way To Sathya Sai Baba” in which he related numerous dreams, scouring every aspect of his life and memory to attribute meaning and significance to them.

Robert Priddy claimed that Sai Baba cured him of a chronic spinal problem through a series of “dream-operations” that resulted in a literal and physical transformation of his spine. Robert Priddy said of Mr. Kylie (“an osteopath and master of various other disciplines”):

“Almost at once he claimed that neither of the two sets of my X rays from different years were mine, because in them the lower spine was in a much more serious condition than I proved to have when he examined it physically. It showed an excessive curvature and a lower vertebra that was badly and permanently displaced. He was even surprised that I was able to walk about with it! Without any comment whatsoever from me he remarked, ‘I would have staked my professional reputation that these X rays are not yours!’ However, my name was photographed into each one. He asked me what on earth I had been doing - how the great improvement in my spine was achieved. I told him I had hardly been able to walk much of the time, let alone exercise. He shook his head and said, most perplexed, that anyway there was simply no method or exercises he knew whereby I could have made the condition so much better...It was not until afterward that I remembered the dream of the operation ‘under anesthesia’ and the bandages on my thighs and mid-riff on either side of the crisis point in my lower spine! Before the ‘rat in the drum’ episode I had even been unable to walk about the house for long without having to lie down. Yet within a month I had gone to India, sitting on airplanes and walking for hours in a day without more than a few tensions! Though I had felt sure that Baba was helping me, I had not realized how radical a change this had required to my anatomy!...I am of the opinion that through my illness I am working off karma from a previous lifetime. I am concerned that it should not be healed only temporarily (i.e., postponed) by whatever means, but that I should be able to suffer it through now, while I have the spiritual support of the living avatar himself.” (Source Of The Dream; “Enigmas of Suffering and Healing”; pp: 179, 181)

Among Sai literature, one can find a variety of stories relating to alleged cures and healings effected through “dream operations” from Sai Baba. Therefore, this type of paranormal phenomena was not unique to Robert Priddy.

After Robert Priddy defected from the Sai Movement, he wrote an Anti-Sai book entitled “End Of The Dream - The Sathya Sai Baba Enigma”. Robert Priddy now believes that all Sai-related dreams are the direct result of one’s subconscious focus, desires and projections.

Therefore, what do the following two dreams reveal about Robert Priddy and his subconscious focus, desires and projections?

“In another (dream) he took my head and neck on his lap, where I rested it fully as he stroked away the pressures.” (Source Of The Dream; “Enigmas of Suffering and Healing”, pp. 174-175)

“Dream of August 18, 1985: I was in our living room with Reidun and my son Kai. Baba came in and spoke to them, whereupon they withdrew to another room. He came over to, bent forward to where I sat, and put his mouth on mine. He breathed into my lungs long, slowly and very deeply, then drew the breath out of me again. I was able to perceive a sort of brownish, gaseous fluid being drawn up from the very root of the spine (the muladhara chakra). This poisonous substance was fully drained off, and Sai Baba looked at me as he swallowed it, appearing momentarily just like the imposing Shiva with a blue throat and the characteristic pile of hair.

Comment: I awoke, immediately, very early in the morning. The experience in the dream left a very strong impression on me. The meaning of the ‘kiss of life’ in life-saving is symbolic, so the dream suggests that my life was saved...What ailment it was that this ‘dream operation’ can have cured me of is uncertain, but I had been awakening at night in a feverish sweat and a truly awful sensation that some sort of poison was gradually rising up my spine. It was so real to me, even though the sensation went away when I awoke, that I felt that it could even mean death if it rose much futher up the spinal column. The last time it occurred, just days before the dream, I had called out for help from Sai Baba and had also taken several spoons of amrit (which we saved from my visit to the temple where it issued from a locket)...Yet I have not experienced the feverish and painful awakening from ‘rising poison’ again.” (Source Of The Dream; “Enigmas of Suffering and Healing”, pp. 174-175)

Since Robert Priddy now contends that Sai Baba is a fraud, then it would appear that his dreams were the result of his desires and projections. Such being the case, one is left to wonder why Robert Priddy would desire to lay his head on Sai Baba’s lap, imagining Sai Baba to “stroke away the pressures”. One is also left to wonder why Robert Priddy would desire Sai Baba to kiss him on the mouth and draw up impurities associated with his “muladhara chakra” (the subtle “sex center” often associated with sexual energy, sexual desire and the genitals).

Using Alan Kazlev’s pseudo-psychologist reasoning (that he used against me), perhaps Robert Priddy saw Sai Baba as a “pretend homosexual lover” and “much loved surrogate father figure”. This is not far fetched because Robert Priddy admitted he did not have a stable father figure in his life (which he divulged in his writings). Since Robert Priddy has never dissented with Alan Kazlev’s bogus psychological-profiling against me, then I see no reason why I cannot cite Alan Kazlev and apply Kazlev’s reasoning to him and his apparent homoerotic dreams.

Anti-Sai Activists can often be seen insinuating sexual impropriety against Sai Baba over mundane and very public events. For example, see rfjvds.dds.nl/movies/saibabamovies.html. On that page, Reinier Van Der Sandt (and whoever helped him create the page) suggested that Sai Baba was being attended by “boys boys boys” and insinuated that a male devotee purposely put his head near Sai Baba’s groin and that Sai Baba smiled because of it. Therefore, I see no reason why I cannot similarly interpret critic’s behavior using the same standards they apply to Sai Baba.

Robert Priddy’s apparent homoerotic dreams would perhaps explain why he is so strongly infatuated obsessed with Sai Baba. Perhaps Robert Priddy is projecting his self-hate, fear, irrationality and negativity about his subconscious and latent homosexual desires onto Sai Baba? Why else would Robert Priddy subconsciously dream of Sai Baba kissing him on the mouth and drawing up impurities from his sex-chakra and swallowing them? Robert Priddy is a big advocate of “projection” and believes that Sai Devotees essentially “project” divinity, holiness and purity onto Sai Baba. So why is it that Sai Devotees are trapped in their “positive projections”, yet Robert Priddy denies (and refuses to address) his “negative projections”, which seem to revolve mostly around sex?

Amusingly, Robert Priddy had a former Indian Guru (a Swami of the Ramakrishna Mission to whom Priddy attributed numerous psychic phenomena) prior to coming to Sai Baba and entertained thoughts that the Swami was a womanizer. Apparently, this Swami foresaw the truth about Robert Priddy with amazing accuracy:

saiguru.net/english/articles/49-3writings.htm
“Only recently was I told that this Swami (since deceased), said to devotees of me that I was “very strong and also later, that I was a sceptic. A ‘septic tank’.” A typical nasty pun, doubtless used on all who rejected him as ‘the master’. This came from one of whom I always spoke about to others and wrote about very respectfully (as in my published book ‘Source of the Dream’ - praising SB, where I describe my relationship to him and to SB at the time).”

Although Robert Priddy can often be seen presenting himself as a self-righteous voice in the Anti-Sai Movement, he is a fierce defender and promoter of Sanjay Dadlani, who has been thoroughly exposed (with proof) as being a sexual deviant of the worst order. Robert Priddy casually dismisses all of Sanjay’s vulgarities and obscenities, yet whines and snivels about morality and ethics! Robert Priddy attacks Sathya Sai Baba with his typical gutter and venomous accusations emanating directly from his skeptic “septic tank”.

Robert Priddy also had the following to say about Sai-related dreams:

home.hetnet.nl/~ex_baba/engels/articles/dreams.html
“The phenomenon of ‘psychic invasion’ is widely reported in many connections, often with so-called ‘spiritual masters’ or gurus. Apparent invasive experience in dreams or waking ‘visions’ – both positive and negative - are usually considered to be symptoms of some form of mental ‘illness’ in many countries, and quite extreme malignant sorts of dream and vision are experienced as completely real by such persons as once regarded as having become ‘possessed’ by incarnate entities. One can however, be certain that phenomena exist and are widespread, but how the originate and how far they are the result of external forces or persons who are using ‘powers’ remains very controversial and largely not researchable by scientific methods thus far.”

Amusingly, since Robert Priddy had over 300 dreams of Sai Baba, he conceded that he displayed “symptoms of mental illness” when he was a Sai Devotee. As a matter of fact, Robert Priddy even related other Sai-related dreams after he defected from Sai Baba, furthering the case that he still suffers from “symptoms of mental illness”. It appears the only time Robert Priddy opens his mouth is to stick his other foot in it or to kiss Sai Baba in his dreams.

Reference