Robert Priddy's Moon Madness

Referenced from robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2007/10/25/deceiving-devotee-makes-bogus-image-of-sai-in-the-moon/

Robert Priddy wrote a blogged article about a Sai Devotee he erroneously accused of making a "bogus image of Sai in the Moon". The image in question is below:


Further sticking his foot in his mouth, Robert Priddy said:

"However, the falsifier who put together the deceptive image presented a completely circular moon. A wholly transparent fraudulence, in fact a wilful, and outright lie! Of course, had this occurred (except perhaps in the over-heated imagination of some devotees), it would have been global news story No. 1!"

Although Robert Priddy's numerous lies have been fully documented and exposed by me, he continues to fraudulently and shamelessly lie about other unapologetically. This type of vicious behavior proves that Robert Priddy is mentally unstable and is in need of orthodox psychological help.

Since Robert Priddy (the alleged and self-professed "scholar") is totally incapable of conducting even the most remedial and elementary or research, let me supply the general public with verifiable facts.

First of all, Darpan (the "Sai Devotee" referred to by Robert Priddy) fully admitted that the image was not real. Darpan said:

Sairam,

Dear all,
this is not a real image, but im sending what i could see and visualise, what we all saw yesterday looking at the moon. there was not need to imagine a shape or make a guess the visual on moon was as clear as the image im sending now. HIS hair, eyes, nose and even HIS smile was very clear.

Sairam,
enjoy! HIS blessings.
yours sincerley,
darpan (Reference)

Secondly, the SaiBabaOfIndia website linked the image directly to the post above. Click on the image for yourself (Reference). Anyone with any semblance of visual and mental acuity can see that the image in question is a composite and is not the Moon. Therefore, Robert Priddy's entire article is based on lies and fraudulent information that he never cared to research or verify for himself (which he can often be seen doing in relation to Sathya Sai Baba).

Robert Priddy loves to jump to the worst case conspiratorial view because he cares more for sensationalism and sleaze and cares less for accuracy and the truth.

Although Robert Priddy published Darpan's email, he apparently never contacted him to get his facts right. Robert Priddy also published Darpan's picture on his blog. What is strange about this is when I published Robert Priddy's public-domain picture on my website (Reference), he whined and hissed that I violated his copyrights. Although Robert Priddy continues to whine and hiss about the publication of his picture on my website (and how it violates his copyrights), he published Darpan's picture (without obtaining his permission) and saw absolutely nothing wrong with copyright issues. More shameless, self-serving hypocrisy from Robert "The Liar" Priddy.

Robert Priddy should immediately delete his defamatory post filled with numerous bold-faced lies and publicly apologize to Darpan. After all, this is exactly the type of behavior that critics demand of me when I make a mistake. They should practice the precept they wish for others to follow.

Reference

Robert Priddy And The saibaba.org.uk Domain

Robert Priddy’s Involvement With A Fraudulent UK Sai Baba Organisation Domain
Recently I was forwarded some links from the saibaba.org.uk website and was shocked to see that the pages contained Anti-Sai material (mostly written by Robert Priddy). The following screencap shows Google’s listings from the saibaba.org.uk domain:


It appears that the webpages were deleted because the domain fraudulently attempted to pass itself off as the official Sathya Sai Seva Organisation in the UK. The official domain for the UK Sathya Sai Service Organisation is srisathyasai.org.uk.

The UK WhoIs domain registry revealed that the person who registered the fraudulent saibaba.org.uk domain did so anonymously on August 16th 2006. The following screencaps show how a couple of the meta-tags on the saibaba.org.uk website list Robert Priddy as being the copyright holder:



Robert Priddy Directly Associated With The Fraudulent saibaba.org.uk Domain:
The following screencaps prove that Robert Priddy is directly and explicitly associated with the fraudulent saibaba.org.uk domain.

Robert Priddy duplicated an article from Barry Pittard on his Anti-Sai website located at: home.no.net/anir/Sai/enigma/barry1.htm?FACTNet.


After 10 seconds, this webpage redirected to saibaba.org.uk/20/barryexcerpt.htm (which has subsequently been deleted).


After viewing Robert Priddy’s HTML source code, there is meta-tag ‘refresh’ script that redirects the page directly to the saibaba.org.uk domain. Needless to say, the only person who can insert the meta-tag ‘refresh’ script into the HTML is the owner and creator of the webpage in question. In this case, that owner and creator is Robert Priddy.


Currently, there is no other known Anti-Sai website or ex-devotee associated with the saibaba.org.uk domain besides Robert Priddy. It is also important to point out that by redirecting links to the saibaba.org.uk domain, web-traffic is lost to the old website when it is re-directed to the new website. Why would Robert Priddy redirect his webpage (and thereby his web-traffic) to another domain if that domain is not his?

Robert Priddy’s Clinical Obsession With Sathya Sai Baba
After years of making absolutely no leeway against Sathya Sai Baba, Robert Priddy has begun to gnash his teeth, foam-at-the-mouth and raise a huge cry by duplicating his repetitive Anti-Sai slop on no less than 5 Anti-Sai domains and 1 (so far known) Anti-Sai blog.

As of September 2007, R.C. Priddy wrote 117 blogged articles against Sathya Sai Baba in 8 months. That is one new article every other day for eight months straight! Apparently, Robert Priddy has no other work, is clinically obsessed with Sai Baba and is trapped in his negative projections about his former Guru.

Now, there is proof that Robert Priddy attempted to publish his Anti-Sai material on a bogus and fraudulent UK Sai Baba Organisation domain. Robert Priddy is an Anti-Sai extremist and fanatic who relies on spam, propaganda and deceit because the truth does not argue in his favor. Robert Priddy’s motto and methodology is “deceive the naive”. This tactic may have worked in the past when he and other critics went unchallenged for years, but it isn’t working now.

Robert Priddy is finally being held accountable for his actions and words.

October 26th 2007 Update: saibaba.org.uk Domain Belongs To Robert Priddy
After I emailed Robert Priddy about his involvement with the fraudulent saibaba.org.uk domain, he published the following statement on the index page:

Robert Priddy created yet another Anti-Sai domain at saibaba-x.org.uk (which mirrors the content on his five other Anti-Sai websites). It is amusing that Robert Priddy attempts to deceive others into thinking that he resides in the UK. He does not. He resides in Oslo Norway. See domain info:

Domain name: saibaba-x.org.uk

Registrant: -

Registrant type: Unknown

Registrant’s address: Agathe Grondahlsgate 2b, Oslo 0478 NO

Relevant dates:
Registered on: 20-Aug-2007
Renewal date: 20-Aug-2009

Reference

Robert Priddy's Man In The Moon

On Wikipedia, the “Man In The Moon” article contains the following information:

“The ‘Man in the Moon’ is a mythical figure resembling a human face, perceived in the full Moon in some cultures. The figure is composed of large dark areas (the lunar maria, or seas) on the Moon’s surface. The figure’s eyes are the Mare Imbrium and Mare Serenitatis, its nose is the Sinus Aestuum, and its open mouth is the Mare Nubium and Mare Cognitum.

The conventionalized image of the Man in the Moon, unlike the vague natural appearance, bears just a very simple, wide-grinning face.

The Man in the Moon is an example of pareidolia. Other cultures perceive the silhouette of a woman, a hare, a frog, moose, or a buffalo in the full moon.

The Nepalese have a tradition that the dead go to the Moon.

In Japan and Korea, popular culture sees a rabbit making mochi and Tteok, respectively, in the moon.

Shia Muslims believe that name of Maulana Ali Ibne-Abi Talib (Muhammad’s son in law) is written on the moon. This interpretation has roots in several sayings (hadith) by Muhammad where he compares Ali with the Moon and himself to Sun. The notion is that Ali’s teaching is the light that shall guide the muslims after Muhammad has departed. There are also other esoteric interpretation of this analogy in islamic philosophy.” (Ref)

The following pictures contain outlines to supposed figures on the Moon along with the infamous Man On The Moon figure:



As one can see, these moon figures are rather vague and are very difficult to perceive without the outlines. However, as Robert Priddy (an ex-devotee) pointed out, there is a very strange and distinct outline on the Moon that is easily perceivable in relation to Sathya Sai Baba. Robert Priddy made several comments about Sathya Sai Baba and the “Man In The Moon” on his Anti-Sai blog and even published the following image:


When looking at the full Moon, one can clearly see an outline of a face within another outline of afro-like hair. When Sathya Sai Baba’s face (minus his hair) is put into the Moon’s empty face-outline, one can easily perceive how the Moon’s afro-like hair outline completes his look. See the following images for examples:





Although I am unsure how many people will support Robert Priddy’s comparison between Sathya Sai Baba and the “Man In The Moon”, I find it strange that he sees his former guru in the Moon, obsesses about his former guru on almost a daily basis and can’t seem to move beyond his anger and bitterness in relation to his former guru. It most certainly appears that Robert Priddy (while constantly howling at the Moon about Sathya Sai Baba) has gone mad. Needless to say, when Robert Priddy was a Sai Devotee, he saw Sathya Sai Baba In The Clouds and In His Green Stone Ring. Who knows where Robert Priddy will next see Sathya Sai Baba and what laughs he will bring us when he does?

Reference